>Let n be a real number
Let n be a real number
What's the problem?
>Let x be a vector space
>Let q be a Hausdorff topological space
>succ(n)
>let [math]i[/math] be op's gf
...
>let i be [math]\sqrt{-1}[/math]
>Let memes be dreams
I somewhat often write proofs that include a pair of sets, and always wonder what should I name them.
Last time I used [math]\nabla[/math] and [math]\Delta[/math], but then I had trouble choosing what to call an element of [math]\nabla[/math].
Obviously [math]\delta\in\Delta[/math].
Do people do this?
>succ(d)
Sheer poetry.
narrow-minded
>∀1
never
>[math]\forall \epsilon < 0[/math]
i like it
really fuck with them. use:
[math] \partial \in \nabla [/math]
Wow, this is great.
Not only does it fit in with [math]\nabla[/math], it even looks like [math]\delta[/math].
Let OP be a faggot.
> ∴ and therefore
Kek. Nice one.
Holy shit that made me laugh so hard thanks user
>let n be a nigger
>viz.
>Remark: [some obvious shit that no one cares about but the author added clearly because they wanted to pad their paper]
yeah. as a bonus it'll make your proofs unreadable to all freshmen and plenty of other undergrads as well
Maybe I could use it as a practical joke.
Make sure to use My and Ny simultaneously in all your handwritten 4 page long chalkboard drawings.
How will op ever recover
Let m be a meme
>implying OP isn't a faggot by implication
Let the set S be the set of OP's previous girlfriends. Assume the following:
>all faggots never had at least one girlfriend
Prove by contradiction that S is empty
>suppose S is not empty
>then S has at least one element
>but OP is a faggot
>therefore OP could not have had a gf
>therefore the supposition that the set S has at least one element must be false
>therefore S is empty
Q.E.D.
I really really like this picture?
>Let G be a subgroup of H
Assume OP is not a faggot. Contradiction.
I laugh internally every time I see Peano numbers
What is fucking wrong with that?