Let n be a real number

>Let n be a real number

What's the problem?

>Let x be a vector space

>Let q be a Hausdorff topological space

>succ(n)

>let [math]i[/math] be op's gf

...

>let i be [math]\sqrt{-1}[/math]

>Let memes be dreams

I somewhat often write proofs that include a pair of sets, and always wonder what should I name them.
Last time I used [math]\nabla[/math] and [math]\Delta[/math], but then I had trouble choosing what to call an element of [math]\nabla[/math].
Obviously [math]\delta\in\Delta[/math].

Do people do this?

>succ(d)

Sheer poetry.

narrow-minded

>∀1

never

>[math]\forall \epsilon < 0[/math]

i like it

really fuck with them. use:
[math] \partial \in \nabla [/math]

Wow, this is great.
Not only does it fit in with [math]\nabla[/math], it even looks like [math]\delta[/math].

Let OP be a faggot.

> ∴ and therefore

Kek. Nice one.

Holy shit that made me laugh so hard thanks user

>let n be a nigger

>viz.

>Remark: [some obvious shit that no one cares about but the author added clearly because they wanted to pad their paper]

yeah. as a bonus it'll make your proofs unreadable to all freshmen and plenty of other undergrads as well

Maybe I could use it as a practical joke.

Make sure to use My and Ny simultaneously in all your handwritten 4 page long chalkboard drawings.

How will op ever recover

Let m be a meme

>implying OP isn't a faggot by implication

Let the set S be the set of OP's previous girlfriends. Assume the following:
>all faggots never had at least one girlfriend
Prove by contradiction that S is empty
>suppose S is not empty
>then S has at least one element
>but OP is a faggot
>therefore OP could not have had a gf
>therefore the supposition that the set S has at least one element must be false
>therefore S is empty
Q.E.D.

I really really like this picture?

>Let G be a subgroup of H

Assume OP is not a faggot. Contradiction.

I laugh internally every time I see Peano numbers

What is fucking wrong with that?