Are the Pevear and Volokhonsky translations just a meme due to marketing...

He’s not wrong

>why care about the opinion of a great writer with native grasp of russian when you can listen to autistic monolingual anglo college students
W E W
E
W

>I love Constance Garnett, and wish I had a framed picture of her on my wall, since I have often thought that what I do for a living is teach the Collected Works of Constance Garnett. She has a fine sense of English, and, especially, the sort of English that appears in British fiction of the realist period, which makes her ideal for translating the Russian masterpieces. Tolstoy and Dostoevsky were constantly reading and learning from Dickens, Trollope, George Eliot and others. Every time someone else redoes one of these works, reviewers say that the new version replaces Garnett; and then another version comes out, which, apparently, replaces Garnett again, and so on. She must have done something right.

-- Gary Saul Morson, scholar of Russian literature

>what I do for a living is teach the Collected Works of Constance Garnett
That about sums it up. Garnett may have a fine sense of English, but she's a shit translator. Anyone who disagrees мoжeт пpocлeдoвaть нaхyй.

>When Ralph Matlaw [another notable Russian lit scholar] set out to translate The Brothers Karamazov for Norton in the 1970s, he quickly gave up the idea because of the excellence of Garnett's work.
(from the book Dostoevsky in Context)

Matlaw wound up revising Garnett's translation for Norton instead.

The Oxford Guide to Literature in English translation calls Nabokov's literalist approach to translations as "unusual and extreme."

>PV
>Alexei Fyodorovich Karamazon was the third son of a landowner from our district, Fyodor Pavlovich Karamazov, well known in his own day (and still remembered among us) because of his dark and tragic death, which happened exactly thirteen years ago and which I shall speak of in its proper place. For the moment I will only say of this "landowner" (as we used to call him, thought for all his life he hardly ever lived on his estate) that he was a strange type, yet one rather frequently met with, precisely the type of man who is not only worthless and depraved but muddleheaded as well - one of those muddleheaded people who still handle their own little business deals quite skillfully, if nothing else. Fyodor Pavlovich, for instance started with next to nothing, he was a very small landownder, he ran around having dinner at other men's tables, he tried to foist himself off as a sponger, and yet at his death he was discovered to have as much as a hundred thousand roubles in hard cash. At the same time he remained all his life one of the most muddleheaded madcaps in our district. Again I say it was not stupidity - most of these madcaps are rather clever and shrewd - but precisely muddleheadedness, even a special, nation form of it.
>CG
>Alexey Fyodorovitch Karamazov was the third son of Fyodor Pavlovitch Karamazov, a land owner well known in our district in his own day, and still remembered among us owing to his gloomy and tragic death, which happened thirteen years ago, and which I shall describe in its proper place. For the present I will only say that this “landowner”—for so we used to call him, although he hardly spent a day of his life on his own estate—was a strange type, yet one pretty frequently to be met with, a type abject and vicious and at the same time senseless. But he was one of those senseless persons who are very well capable of looking after their worldly affairs, and, apparently, after nothing else. Fyodor Pavlovitch, for instance, began with next to nothing; his estate was of the smallest; he ran to dine at other men's tables, and fastened on them as a toady, yet at his death it appeared that he had a hundred thousand roubles in hard cash. At the same time, he was all his life one of the most senseless, fantastical fellows in the whole district. I repeat, it was not stupidity—the majority of these fantastical fellows are shrewd and intelligent enough—but just senselessness, and a peculiar national form of it.

Judge the subtleties of style for yourself, to my non-anglo eye it all looks roughly the same. I gotta say I like 'muddleheaded' way more than 'senseless', sounds properly anachronistic

That is a shill article. Apparently, they were biased due to connections.

PDF with PV fucked up some letters, so nevermind that

They're good.

This site is contrarian by nature so alot of people shit on them.

I prefer the CG translation tbqh

TFW just bought a copy of Anna Karenina but it's the Constance Garnett translation.

Did I fuck up?

It's fine. None of the are perfect, фaмaлaм.

I read a number of Garnett translations before I knew anything about the virtues or vices of her work. Lots of people who know no better like to shit on them because some publisher pushing some other translation shits on it, but they're just fine. I've also read McDuff translations of Dusty and liked them well enough.

There are two reasons I usually avoid P&V translations... the first is that the idiom feels too contemporary to me. I think a 19th century novel should not read like something contemporary. The second is that I'm a cheap bastard and the garnett translations can be found in cheapo editions (like Wordsworth Classics, which also have the best cover art).

I read a translation of Demons/Devils/Possessed, though I forget which (Magarshack, maybe). I recall one of the characters speaking like a cockney fellow, which was pretty fucked up.

Garnett for Tolstoy is superior. For Dostoevsky you don't have many options for modern translations other than P&V. The Oliver Ready Crime and Punishment is the best. For other Russians, like Bulgakov, P&V are unreadable. Yes, they're a meme.

Not native english speaker here, but I'll drop my 2 centavos.

First time I read "The Idiot" was on a pretty lamey translation. I couldn't afford a better one back then and was travelling so I had to settle with that.
Couple of years later I got my hands on a translation straight from russian. Much better! But it didn't change the experience as much as I thought it would. So, I don't know. it was better, but not THAT better.

TL;DR: reading it on any edition is better than not reading it.

I like the more formalized 19th century styling of the CG better. Def not the same

The top is so much better.

>not knowing a Slavic language
Don't worry, you'll never get close to Russian, doesn't matter which translation.

Garnett may not be the most accurate translation but I enjoy her style. It's comfy.

Just looked at my copy
>Rosemary Edmonds
Opinions?

PV is better.

I'm one of the autists who recommend Lattimore. Is PV for me? Is there any other literal translator who handles it better? I can't get over PV's use of Wicked instead of Spiteful in Notes from Underground.
You're stuck reading all the shitty ~contemporary translations of Don Quixote, then.

regardless of translation, if you can't tell the difference between Tolstoy and Dostoyevsky ur no good to anybody

Who makes these rare Pepes? they're exquisite.

>Rosemary Edmonds
>Constance Garnett
What the fuck bongistanians, keep your womyns in check away from the classics

...

I do.

...

...

...

...

...

...

...

>Nabokov says sensationalist bullshit for attention and to distance literary merit from established figures
more at 11

this so hard

revised Garnett is best

care to back that up with a source my friend?

P&V are marketing memes, get that shit the fuck out of here

For BK, get the Ignat Avsey translation, it's god-tier.

>person without working knowledge of original language thinks his opinion on translations has any value whatsoever

oтвpaтитeльнoe нeгp шлюхa

пoкинyть этo мecтo нeмeдлeннo

>implying I'm not a ruskie
try again friendo

>implying I'm not a ruskie
>he said in English

You are not Russian. You are Ukrainian and you just want to give Russia a bad name, so you recommend the Garrett translation in hopes of making Westerners hate Russian lit so that they will take back Crimea for you. You cannot fool me Khokhol.

>tfw Ashkenazi Jew from Russia
>tfw tell people I'm Russian
>tfw this lulls them into a false sense of security and then I
do nothing

>mfw most "Russians" in the USA are (((Russians))) because of preferential immigration legislation for Jews

Sorry goys