Book on puberty of boys catches flack for stating that girls grow breasts to feed babies and to look grownup and attractive to boys.
I am pretty sure that all female mammals above monotremes do, in fact, grow breasts to feed babies, and I didn't think it was at all controversial that secondary sexual characteristics (including female breasts in humans) help attract on sex to the other.
So what the fuck is everybody losing their shit over?
nytimes.com
Why are you surprised that a gaggle of science denying progs lose their shit over any little thing? Don't you know how hysterical the times we're living in are? Hardly anyone cares about facts. Nobody cares about arguments. "I don't like this book so you have to burn it!" passes for criticism nowadays.
>So what the fuck is everybody losing their shit over?
Have you been under a rock for the past 3 years? Postmodern Anarco-Communists have taken over liberal arts academia, politics, and the media.
It's transphobic and sexist. It's 2017 you immature piss babies! Grow UP.
...
Forgot pic
Obvious bait is obvious.
I read the passage, don't have it to hand, and it could have been phrased better, But yes, it was only stating the truth.
who cares
>Anarcho-communists have taken over politics and the media
Tell me this was meant to be ironic.
funfact: female breasts are attractive to females, too. at least this is stated in developmental psychology, a well known soft science.
>adjetive noun is adjetive
Such a fucking cringe format
It's an old tradition here. Lurk moar, newfag.
Triggered
Say that to my face IRL and not online and see what happens
Just like men are attracted to dicks
No that only happens to homosexuals or when you fap to internet porn
>and to look grownup and attractive to boys.
That's backwards though. Women need breasts regardless. Men find them attractive because they feed offspring.
Turn on the news and watch them praise antifa.
Except we are the only apes that have tits year round. The hypothesis is that this is specifically to attract mates. We also have the biggest dicks.
I know the answer is just that feminism has gone too far but what exactly is the problem here? That article was going on about it being tongue in cheek as if it were a joke. Tits are indeed a sign of sexual maturity as well as a means of attracting mates directly.
>Have you been under a rock for the past 3 years? Postmodern Anarco-Communists have taken over liberal arts academia, politics, and the media.
They have been in control since the end of WWII.
Most men fap to internet porn
I don't know how serious this is, but if I really *had* to tell you what's problematic about that... I guess it's because it says girls do things specifically to attract boys? Like, because part of their self-worth is defined by what men think of them, and that's a bad thing? Because they are strong women who don't need no man?
How close am I?
Liberals =/= Anarco-Communists
lol
>the news media which exist as a corporate controlled business to sell viewers to advertisers and the public relations industry is secretly anarcho-communist.
fucking delusional m8
they "praise" antifa while pushing the rhetoric that views them as "extremists", pay no attention to the ideological motives behind antifascist action, anarchism or communism. basically they set antifa up as an anti trump strawman. This is how the so called liberal media sets the limits of acceptable discourse.
let me know when itsgoingdown or crimthinc have a cable news network.
commies are literally the worst and i hate that the more libertarian communist put an "anarcho" in front of their name. anarchism isnt about doctrinal bullshit and popular revolutions, its about shining the light upon and riding ourselves of coercive social institutions.
Trotskists are red bureaucrats and Marxists are dogmatic and devoid of ethics, just like liberals.
Go back to your containment board, inbred white trash stormtards.
>>>/pol
hey, retard! why did you just call my post here >inbred white trash stormtards.
are you illiterate?
>Complains about Trotskyist Marxist boogeyman.
>Not poltard.
i espoused anarchism in the same post you mong. The fact that Marxism is all science and socialism and no ethics and socialism is not a boogeyman. The fact trotskism advocates vanguardism and a state dictatorship of the proletariat by the ruling party is not a boogeyman. idiot
>anarkid
you're just as retarded as him
Great argument you have there bud
Letting women, an inferior group of people cognitively, have a voice is what happened. Some small penis """men""" orbiters join in a pathetic attempt to have sex with them.
>WHITE TRASH WHITE TRASH INBRED!! TARDS!!!
not an argument. go away.
My Jordan Peterson post is not white trash, sort yourself out, bucko.
>fucking delusional m8
Globalists want no boarders.
Antifa wants no boarders.
∴ Globalists support Antifa whenever they riot over illegals being treated as illegals.
...
>lurk moar, newfag.
is this 2007
Antifa wants facists to be treated like they deserve. The serious anarchists that are oldfag antifa want no borders because they want no state. That is very different from the neoliberal dream that relies heavily on both protectionism for so called "first world" markets and liberalization for so called "third world" markets. Neoliberalism AKA(to idiots) "globalism" relies on corporate-state hegemony to be instilled and upheld. See NA"FT"A for a prime example, made by state powers with no accountability to or input from the public ,ignored by the media when it was snuck in to existence, and is ultra-protectionist for transnational corporations and the federal banks that protect them. This is very different from anarchists who want to seek and destroy all coercive social institutions.
Literally all the media talks about antifa is the fact that they are opposed to thinly vieled ethnic nationalism that is being protected by state powers. The corporate state always sides with facists over liberty, its good for business.
You're the only person who doesn't belong on Veeky Forums, idiot.
Back to your safe space.
Childhood fantasies don't deserve arguments.
>childhood fantasy
A blatant tell that you don't even know what anarchism is about
Its not some doctrinal system for creating a utopian society, it's a process and methodology for exsposing and destroying coercive, hierarchal institutions. Anarchy is not a fantasy, it is innately dynamic, and brought about by the ongoing action of anarchism.
Anarchy and anarchism is everywhere.
Well that is true from an evolutionary standpoint though. 'Worth' (if you define it as a positive trait for reproduction) is determined by how you attract a mate.
>Side with fascists over liberty
Literally when. Cite cases. Do you even know what a fascist is?
Besides do you not understand the use of manipulating stupids like anarchists to do what you want (ie spreading the idea that borders are bad). Are you people retarded or something and can't understand why shit like Antifa, BLM, etc gets basically zero flak for what they do?
cite cases
primolevicenter.org
crimethinc.com
police states always protect facism. you have police protection and government representation going to neo nazi groups like golden dawn in Greece, white supremacists in america and Britain, virtual everywhere. Especially when you look at the roots of antifa under the third reich. Police protection is given to facists and dissenters are violently persecuted. The law is on the side of fascism, the right of people to organize with the explicit purpose of instilling state violence on oppression of other people is firmly protected, the right of people to organize against the former is not. The later organization is violently repressed under the guise of "free speech"(a legal construct that is worthless when you do not recognize the authority of the state to take away or grant speech) the argument is basically legality=morality and in this way state protection is the only ethical ground fascism has to stand on.
>Do you even know what a fascist is?
yes i do. There is the literal sense which is basically trash, and there is the pragmatic sense which is used sensu lato to denote any popular movement that seeks to establish coercive hierarchies in social institutions that force ethinic-economic hegemony through state power. This is the sense you ought to assume fascism is used in unless the conversation is about Mussolini.
>Besides do you not understand the use of manipulating stupids like anarchists to do what you want
>thinking people engaged in anarchy consume the business media for any reason other than scoffs and giggles
cont/
even if i accept this as shitty bait you should still consider suicide
(ie spreading the idea that borders are bad)
this is a blatantly wrong statement and a ridiculous interpretation of the intentionality and the effect of the 'liberal' media advocating for the STATE allowing immigration. It all has to do with the ideological protection of neoliberal trade policies like NA"FT"A. lets take NA**A as an example, the mass immigration of Mexican peasantry following market liberalization in mexico and the resulting disintegration of its established socio-ecological systems is a consequence. The media has a vested interest in allowing the business class to have access to cheap immigrant labor. The state neoliberal policy and therefor borders and is implicit in cheap immigrant labor and the corporate hegemony to exist. If there are no borders to cross there is no way to establish economic domination of the population immigrating. The media NEVER pushes ideology advocating for the absence of borders. It pushes an ideaology that protects the unrestrained flow of capital across borders into the hands of economic power(transnational corporations) enough of me talking about. Have a video of an expert and anarchist(who is basically blacklisted from appearing on the mainstream media) discussing this, that i highly recommend you watch youtu.be
>Antifa, BLM, etc gets basically zero flak for what they do?
>organizing and subsequently getting beaten, arrested and pushed into violent situations by police repression
>zero flak
wew lad
...
>police states always protect facism. you have police protection and government representation going to neo nazi groups like golden dawn in Greece, white supremacists in america and Britain, virtual everywhere. Especially when you look at the roots of antifa under the third reich. Police protection is given to facists and dissenters are violently persecuted.
These people are complaining that they can't assault who ever they want and that they get arrested for it. Acoording to them they have not attacked anyone at the Trump rallies or any of the protests. It has all been self-defence against "hate speech". This includes when they assault blacks who disagree with them
Yes, you can't assault people because you think they are quilty of wrongthink and the police will arrest you for it. This isn't the police siding with the fascists, you are just being delusional
youtube.com
>Acoording to them
Please point me to the PR release where antifa said this, lol.
>Yes, you can't assault people because you think they are quilty of wrongthink and the police will arrest you for it.
The police arrest them just for organizing you mong. You can't deport people away from their homes just because you don't like them being their, I mean you can, but that is immoral and people organizing for such vile things should be met with resistance. You people like to joke about "hur build wall deport the mexiniggers" but people's entire lives are being destroyed IRL, it's not okay. And the only thing you can say to rationalize such a vile agenda is the law, the law that protects you from the social repercussions of being an asshole.
>YouTube
This is just about the level of discourse I would exspect from someone who informs themselves in the BTFO YouTube echo chamber.
Have you ever considered that everything you just said is a buzzword that has an ill-defined meaning?
Reddit opinion. Go back.
wtf i love reddit now
Progressives have gone insane. If this continues we are going to end up with another Lysenkoism.
Antisocial fat pig virgin feminist have a hard time processing the fact that in human lives reproduction and breeding is a significant factor. Because you know.,they can't n get to achieve a desirable outcome in that part of life. So they get mad at this precisely.
I think the phrasing is too clumsy and ambiguous. Its a childrens book not a biology text. People are stupid if they think science denial is an issue here.
I don't found big breast attractive, but busty girls want to date with me.