Is there any way that we can stop or control the overpopulation? It's for a school research

They won't sub saharan birth rates are already lower than they were in the last decade, it will keep dropping like any other country that previously had high birth rates and low life expectancy.

>it will keep dropping like any other country that previously had high birth rates and low life expectancy.
Even in they do, the population will quadruple by 2100. And how can you be so sure? Africans are very different from Eurasians, they are not a family-centric monogamous people.

we can just nuke china

China is actually decreasing in population.
We need to nuke south asia and africa

nuke muslims then, they breed like rats and nuke china anyway

South Asia is also almost down to two kids per woman.

Just Africa, really.

No such thing. You've been lied to all your life.

developed nations are shrinking anyway

and nature seems to be taking care of it

The two things that did it in the West:
1) a functioning pension system
2) full educational, economic and political rights for women

All the other necessary changes will flow out from those. Without them, no permanent solution exists.

> 2) full educational, economic and political rights for women
user, this is Islam. Islam, please meet our ignorant friend user.

Yes, the 1st world's population is naturally flat lining - which is exactly what needs to happen. However, the far left retards want to bring in the entire 3rd world - who seem to do nothing else but fuck and have kids - and the 1% want to bring in more and more 3rd world parasites for cheap labor and driving down labor costs.

>religion+state
no surprise here

There is no overpopulation kid. See pic related.

Education, work, hygiene, cleaning, art, culture, spirituality, love, philosophy, and business

>population density is all that matters lmao you can squeeze us all into a megacity the size of Albania with the population density of nyc and everything would be just fine lmao
where do you mongoloids come from?

One of the darkest spots in central europe.
Life's a breeze, multiple grocery stores nearby, can walk everywhere I want to, superb transportation and highest medical quality.

But I've also been on the other side, with a house and my car and nobody else in 20+ km proximity. Needless to say, it sucked.

sure geezer, now go take the red pill

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Overshoot_Day

Population density has nothing to do with the carrying capacity of this earth you Mongoloid.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Overshoot_Day

I am also able to make up calculations that are not relevant to reality.

But you have to realise with modern agricultural technology, waste management and nuclear power plants, coupled with the fact that a normal human can survive with one bowl of rice per day, we are able to sustain ALOT more people than today.

Historically, overpopulation stems from the western european mindset, but once you really travel the world for a bit your realise just HOW MUCH SPACE everywhere is. Pic related is only russia, Africa is much much bigger than that.

Another fictitios metric.

>survive with a bowl of rice a day
THAT IS WHY OVERPOPULATION IS A PROBLEM YOU DENSE FUCK

IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SPACE AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH MINIMAL STANDARDS OF LIVING

>standard of living highest its ever been
>population highest its ever been
Hmmmmm... doesn't seem to be a problem

>I am also able to make up calculations that are not relevant to reality.
[citation needed]

I hope you're trolling breh. The world doesn't begin and end at whatever central European major metro area you happened to find yourself in. 35,000 people starve every day.

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Overshoot_Day

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth_Overshoot_Day#Criticism
> forests and fisheries are, as a whole, regenerating faster than they are depleted, while cropland and pasture use is equal to what is available
> Earth Overshoot Day does a poor job at measuring water and land mismanagement (e.g., soil erosion)
>and only highlights the excess of carbon dioxide that humanity releases
>Mathis Wackernagel, founder and president of the Global Footprint Network, points out that a reliable adjustment to the current analysis
>behind Earth Overshoot Day would "require data sets that do not exist",

tl;dr: Anthropomorphic climate change: yes, bio-resource depletion: probably not

>overpopulation

"Mun white genocide". Back to /Jew/ with your fake news shit, Goldberg.

>fisheries are, as a whole, regenerating faster than they are depleted,
telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1533125/All-seafood-will-run-out-in-2050-say-scientists.html

I'd bet way more people starved in the past, even though there were fewer total people. You didn't respond to the point. The average or even minimal standard of living is higher than its ever been.

Overpopulation is a very real issue but in Africa only. Maybe in middle east and India. The rest of the world will soon have issues with underpopulation.

This. Population density has literally nothing to do with overpopulation. A wealthy densely populated city is not overpopulated at all. An African desert where people do not even have basic needs yet shit out one child after another, is.

>scientists say

>The average or even minimal standard of living is higher than its ever been.

It would be even higher without overpopulation. Heck, in certain very overpopulated regions in subsaharan Africa it is not higher at all and lots of people still starve.

The minimal/average standards of living in the West have been declining for a very long time, most of the rest of the world is basically a giant shanty town desperately trying to immigrate to the west. Do you know anything?

Imagine a world where no one said that and instead started it with, "Correlations say,...".

Overpopulation isn't the cause of starvation in those places. Ignorance and retardation is.

>A wealthy densely populated city is not overpopulated at all.

cities may even be underpopulated, hence why urbanization is booming

overpopulation is all about carrying capacity, not population density

there would be a lot less starving people if they had 1.5 children per woman instead of 5+

so yes, overpopulation is the cause, along with retardation, both of those feed off each other

No, your logic is completely flawed. It doesn't matter what they do or where they go, those people will always be starving because of who they are, not where they are. They are poverty-minded. There's no cure for that.

Extrapolation is just prophecy using bone throwing. IRL, it doesn't work.

This statement is everything wrong with modern academics. Go to youtube -> Sibiria or youtube -> Africa.

Minimal standards of living is enough. We'll all die one day, no matter if we live to be 80 or 40, the result is the same. But the more people you have around you, the higher your chance of survival, in general.

Nuke the pajeets.

China's people aren't all starving and have a billion people.

Depends on the system. If the dynamics behind it are understood, extrapolation can be reasonable, ie. I/V curves of diodes. But other systems like population development are much much more difficult.

Yeahhhhh you're a moron. Go to Somalia to visciously compete over your daily bowl of rice if it's all the same to you.

It is an obvious logical fallacy being pointed out, with those 2 charts, nothing more. Hence, the two dice can only have the highest number of 12 yet the extrapolation goes way over that. People who make these charts do so very limitedly. They never take into account anything in the real world.

ignorance - the post

>says a shitposter

>overpopulation causes starvation

Sure thing, kid.

According to /pol/ we just need to stop sending medicines to Africa. Realistically speaking it's inhuman but some birth control wouldn't hurt

There will always be people like you who do not understand what overpopulation means.

worldpopulationbalance.org/3_times_sustainable

"overpopulation" is a sheep control term, kid.

Have none of you morons taken a biology class?

I really think Jewish-run news media is more than enough education for anyone, user.

>there isnt over population
Must not get angery

>The minimal/average standards of living in the West have been declining for a very long time
No.

Back in the day

>AFRICA IS UNDERPOPALTED WE NEEED MORE WORKERS!!.

Now
>AFRICA IS OVERPOPULATED.

See the autism now?

>What is the difference between reality and a mathematical model of reality?

Climate change will do it just fine and it'll naturally kill off the least desirable people. It's beautiful.

>world parasites for cheap labor an

Look at Iran's fertility rate.

What you've done is stated that there is no overpopulation, and then made an argument that concludes that there is no overpopulation in the first world, with no mention of China, India and Sub-Saharan Africa

It's simple. Just take millions of fast breeding third world immigrants and flood them into the first world with full welfare benefits.
Also, keep sending food and doctors to Africa, they are so much better off now that they aren't living in small tribal communities.
Just say you're doing it to 'save Europe' because white people are breeding below replacement.
Oh you want to stop over population to reduce the impact on the Earths climate, my bad, just the opposite of what I said.

Cut all foreign aid

Keep niggers out of the first world

Encourage genetically beneficial behavior (i.e. encouraging smart and rich people to reproduce more, heavier law enforcement for subhuman populations)

War