Psst....kid...wanna read some Jung?

Psst....kid...wanna read some Jung?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8ABa4RdNPxU
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

And Jung, you know, he talks about the subconscious. Well, guess, what, bucko! That's God!

And what do you find in the subconscious? Well, I'll give you a little example. We all know the story of Adam and Eve in the garden, that's a walled garden, you know, the ideal human environment, nature and civilization. But in that garden there lurks a snake! Now what is the snake? You might think it's just a predator, the unknown. But the subconscious is going to tell you, it's a penis! A huge reptilian penis! And you think, wow, by God, that's quite a feat of the imagination! That took the West two thousand years to figure out! It wasn't until Freud!

Psst...kid...wanna sort yourself out?

>Now what is the snake? You might think it's just a predator, the unknown. But the subconscious is going to tell you, it's a penis!

I would have guessed an umbillical cord.

Australians...

Or

Basque... people...

...

Me mum says I can't talk to no strangers

strangers said i can't talk to my mum

Your mom is an oedipal over arching bitch

it's, NOT good

it can really mess you up

and getting messed up is NO JOKE

...

...

Where is the video when he says this

SOLZHENITSYN

He says sort yourself out in like every video he's in

Read this entire thread in a sad Kermit the Frog voice.

Fuck off out of my head Peterson.

and that's that

I've recently realized that JBP is just the traditionalist Zizek, which made me love him even more

kek

i'm fucking done

why?

This reminds me of Pinocchio.

Now, it took me a long time to figure this out, but I think I got it

>I've recently realized that JBP is just the traditionalist Zizek

Exactly.

To me, that's a positive

But that's exactly the type of interpretation Jung would discourage, that often times it might be sexual but there's always more there to figure out.

That's because it's a poor attempt at a parody of Peterson's thought

It is to me too, I like them both.

...

...

Thinking about the fact that Zizek is 67 y.o. and both him and Peterson will die in my lifetime fills me with dread. If only they were to meet and somehow synthesize their thought, it would be the greatest spectactle of sophistry and inspiration ever witnessed

>If only they were to meet and somehow synthesize their thought, it would be the greatest spectactle of sophistry and inspiration ever witnessed

JP really is quite similar to Zizek in a way.

Peterson is the first public intellectual I find genuinely interesting and even influential in my own life. Anybody else having had this experience?

wow this impression is so good i know it was an impression four words in

HAHAHAHAH WHAT THE FUCK, ARE U TRYNNA 'AVE A LAUGH

no

It's basically Hegel and Lacan vs Nietzsche and Jung

Peterson hates Lacan and Zizek hates Jung, they would never agree on anything

Also Zizek is obviously smarter and has a broader education as well, but he's also obviously more wrong

yes. He's great, and he talks like my relatives who are also rural Canadians so i find him comfy. He's a good manifestation of DFW "new sincerity"

same t b h

>Zizek is smarter
Definitely more consciously intellectual. Or intellectual-presenting. I don't know about smart, I think JP is smarter than most people give him credit for. He's just not as good at expressing his ideas, which are admittedly kind of big and hard to express.

JP has a tendency to meander manically. Which I personally like, but I can see why people find it off-putting.

That said, his interview with Transliminal from 2014 is absolutely amazing.

H*ck off, shill.

What I would not give to see a conversation between Zizek and Peterson

Which one do you think has a sillier accent?

I wish he was my dad

Same. I absolutely love him

>JP really is quite similar to Zizek in a way.

This is your brain on Jung

>starts crying
THEY ARE MAKING THE FROGS GAY!!

leave alex jones alone, he's just a humble water filter merchant

I wish I were dead

Well they are both quite psychoanalytical. The big difference though is that Zizek is a materialist and Peterson is more of a phenomenologist.

So what do you get? Well you end up with millions dead and even more starving! But ohh no, 'that wasn't real communism!' 'That wasn't real socialism!' They always say that, 'that wasn't real socialism!' Of course what that really means is 'if I were the dictator...'

Jokes aside though his critique of Marxism is very concise and useful to reference in debate

I imagine *sniff* dat Zizek, dat ish to shay *rubs nose* the emulator of the homelesh man, lover of Hegel an so on *sniffle* would mosht certainly not, as plashtic penish you could assume, you know, *sniff* his voice and manner might be considered the shilliest an so on

debates are just for entertainment though

>Zizek hates Jung

Literally why?

Freud was the dogmatic cultist hack. Is it because he loves Lacan, who insisted on a "return to Freud"?

Well duh

>Is it because he loves Lacan, who insisted on a "return to Freud"?

That's basically it, and it's absolutely disgusting

Supposedly because he and Hegel have contradictory conceptions of the Weltgeist/anima mundi, but in reality it's probably just because Jung associated with some fascists

>Jung associated with some fascists

Not a Jung cultist, but this is blatantly false.

>Jungianism
>Disgusting

I don't know why anyone would prefer to Freud to Lacan, and I say that as someone who likes both.

...

Because Freud was right about everything.
Jung was too retarded to even call wrong

>I've recently realized that JBP is just the traditionalist Zizek

You're a pseud idiot if you believe this and are probably just hearing similar psychoanalytic terminology without being able to actually comprehend and compare the substance of what they say

youtube.com/watch?v=8ABa4RdNPxU

new video. new sorting.

I think you've got it backwards. Zizek is very characteristic of a typical professor, however that means that he also has this typical professorial stupidity. Idk how to call it, maybe people who have been exposed to academia will now what I mean.
Peterson comes off as more intellectual than a professor, if that's even possible. The vibe he gives off is of a person that he sits in his field so well, that he is a like a virtuoso in his lectures. Sometimes speaking metaphorically, sometimes not as strictly as needed and that is why perhaps people have trouble understanding. He just knows too much, and skips over parts that he finds obvious.

Jung is way more interesting/honest/sincere than Freud.

Freud was a way better writer, though.

I wish he was my dad

I suspect this is part of why Harold Bloom is so fond of Freud but dislikes Jung

GOOLARG ARKIPELICAN

I read it in Zizek's voice. It's real!

He hathlthl a Donald Duck thing too which hathlthl no representation in written English.

...

Jung was a literal spy against the nazis during ww2. If he was a fascist, he sure was a bad one.

*uses The Gulag Archipelago as facts*

ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY MILLION PEOPLE DIED!!

commie

Jordan peterson is a fear monger though.

I love this man.

In what way exactly? If you ask me, the people who disagree with him are danger-minimizers.

He puts across the idea that every single human's choice puts humanity closer to destruction or ascension. How could that be anything but fear mongering when you're portraying the world as being that fragile?

I just think he's being honest. I've only heard that in response to people being nihilistic and it was more of a response aimed at making people feel like they matter in the world. If someone is instilled with fear after listening to JP I think it has more to do with the listener because that's not really the normal reaction.

>He puts across the idea that every single human's choice puts humanity closer to destruction or ascension.

Well even if that is tongue-in-cheek, how is that not true?

I mean, the fact that the electricity is even on permanently in my house is because the people responsible for the electricity are actually honest and hard-working.

Nothin personnel... kid

he looks cool as fuck in this

>facts

ummmmmmmmmmmmmm

american

The other Peterson thread got taken down, the fuck

>Jung is way more interesting/honest/sincere than Freud.

Which means fuck all if he's wrong

>lmao my actions have 0 far reaching consequences
the only thing fragile here is your perception of reality
I told you, wait until the evening when the yuropoors are in bed. They're unable to separate a discussion about Jung/Freud from a discussion about muh genders. They also get extremely asspained by this man's politics because most of them don't have protections for freedom of speech in their legal codes.

Its more like Europeans don't live in such an embarrassingly sentimental society that we would listen to someone still calling himself a "Jungian"

We must have just been conversing on that thread. This is some groupthink nonsense

>>lmao my actions have 0 far reaching consequences

This is an objective fact, yes

anyone else want to 'fuck' jp's daughter?

pics?

Suddenly we're discussing galaxies, are we? What does that have to do with the actions of individuals having far-reaching consequences that impact humanity as a whole? Which seems to me like common sense..

What is the butterfly effect