How do we eradicate the bottom half of the population with sub 100 IQs without causing a social uprising against the...

How do we eradicate the bottom half of the population with sub 100 IQs without causing a social uprising against the elites, scientifically speaking?

with good education
/thread

>eliminate everyone with sub-100 IQs
>now half of the remaining population has a sub-100 IQ
>eliminate everyone recursively
>now only 1 super genius left who will starve and die

Release infertility-inducing/increasing stuff in food officially (for taste or so). Hire a marketing genius to make it appealing to the masses. Smart ppl will google that thing and see its danger and warn people. Dumb people don't listen because "evil science" and "but its cooool". Less dumb people.

Or we smart people should make more babies.

Nice strawman, except those super geniuses will figure out AI and have robots do all the work for them by then. No more need for sub 100 IQ meatbags who'll whine about pay and sick leave

Killing a bunch of people won't fix the problem. An uprising against the elites is inevitable. It's happened hundreds of times in the past and will happen again, society is cyclical. Once an empire reaches a certain level of stagnation something tips it over. Purging sub 100s is impossible, there's billions of them and it's a waste of resources. We need welders, janitors, etc. Who do you propose do these jobs after killing billions? Are you going to do it?

>Who do you propose do these jobs after killing billions?

Robots and a greatly limited AI so that it doesn't become self aware.

all these bell curve studies
comparing everyone to everyone else
but what about comparing themselves to themselves.
I wonder; while the race/phrenology touters will say there difference in intelligence between races and whatever.
I wonder if the race themselves are smarted than they were 20 years ago.
Like I know abbos, and africian tribals are dumber than white people
but are those abbos and african tribals smarter now than they were 20 years ago?
I think that is something those "race realists" don't really talk about

but anyways is right
the best way to resolve this peacefully , is generational.
focus on developing teaching and learning tools to better assist the sub 100 IQs.
Should be noted that some of those sub 100 IQ's are due to much more than just "lack of intelligence", like through downs, autism, traumatic brain injury.
So solving the sub 100 iq problem will involve better treatment and identification/prevention of developmental disabililty, as well aquired brain injury.
Also working to improve everyones diet as well, put everyone on multi vitamins and fish oil. etc...

If you value human life so little that you're willing to kill billions of people then you may as well crank the AI up to maximum and commit suicide. If your only measure for societal success is intelligence then all of us are inadequate.

We don't. They will keep serving the intellectual elite, occasionally producing average or above average individuals.

It's literally impossible for everyone to have an IQ > 100.

> If your only measure for societal success is intelligence then all of us are inadequate.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with that

"Impossible" is just an excuse by lazy people.

individual growthcurves are less available because it is a lot more work to collect statistics on them.
So obviously, they are discussed less. even by race realists

you're retarded lmao, do you know how iq scores work

Kill all niggers, this will not only increase the IQ a large amount but also resolve a large amount of other social problems.
>Source:study of what would happen if all African Americans disappeared.

but still you'd imagine that they would be interested in said findings since that would probably be the best determinant of IQ potential

>except those super geniuses will figure out AI and have robots do all the work for them by then.
Source?

Stop breeding, the randomness of genetic imperialiam is what causes stupid people to always exist.

What about regression to the mean?

>OP hasn't read yet brave new world
>call others brainlets
kek

>he thinks high IQ people will do manual dumb labour

Start with yourself, brainlet

You don't.
>eliminate with IQ below 100
>new IQ is now 100
>Keep doing this like a retard
>Eventually everyone is still IQ 100, but relative to now they are geniuses
>Everyone is a genius
>But who is going to do all the dumb and boring manual labor jobs?

>Fuck basically half of all people are idiots just as before
Hmm dunno, how about we just kill everyone? Seems the only reasonable way to deal with the dilema of intelligence being unevenly dsitributed.

How about instead we actually teach those of average intelligence (the majority of the population) how to focus, manage time,study effectively and appreciate the importance of learning STEM in the coming age of automation so that everyone could contribute to the advancement of the human race instead of a few ego-filled morons too obsessed with their own greatness to work on anything they don't consider glamorous (most of scientific research)?

That would be an absolutely horrible idea. Lower IQ people help keep the balance of society in check. They run low skill jobs and build many of societies foundational networks by befriending each other. I have to question your own IQ and sense for suggesting such a solution