Apparently he spoke at my university yesterday...

The gist is that he was the first thinker to explain how society operates at its foundations in terms of class divisions in how they relate to each other and what we use to create products.
He used this science to predict the superiority of Communism and people have been butthurt at him ever since

isn't 'class division' an ideology tho?

Are you retarded?

question everything

You're exactly right.

He doesn't have any way of finding out when he is speaking.

It means 'never take anything on faith', not 'simulate insanity through nonsense questions'.

You mean non-ironically? Unironically isn't a word.

The basic fact that people have different relationships to the property used for production is rather self evident

communism/marxism is probably definitely going to come back if you look at the core concerns of all the "TRUMP IS FOR THE WORKING CLASS" moronic edgy kids it's pretty much in tune with what they're saying.
they're just too stupid to see why trump isn't the answer.

>american neets wake up
>average board iq drops by 50 points
en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/unironic

i don't feel like i;m part of any class tho

>it's an actual retard posting

At least they're smart enough to see that it isn't Clinton.

>pretending you're not one of those moronic edgy kids
nice try

Leave it to this American NEET to enlighten you:

dictionary.com/misspelling?term=unironic

>he was the first thinker to explain how society operates at its foundations in terms of class divisions

Patently false

>response took a minute and 34 seconds
>moronic
>edgy
What's got your brisket so buttered?

>this one website doesn't have therefore it's not a word
It's in OED and M-W, retard. Stop being the embodiment of dumb american stereotype.

i'm good buddy, can you even argue without claiming the other person is as angry as you clearly are?

Well, you called me buddy so you're clearly the level-headed one here. I'll go punch some holes in walls and then come back a few hours later when my impotent rage simmers down.

for real though, how the hell does people not wanting Mexicans or blatantly corrupt career politicians running the country = latent desire for communism to you?

They both friendly chatted about other things and didn't managed to outline where they disagree, and chatted until the time was up, boo.

t. brainlet
haha you're shit at pretending thanks for outing yourself it's cute.
my advice to you is try reading outside of your "real news" sources :^).

I see now. Thank you fampire.

>Its not blatently straight forward so can it be! :O

Not even that guy but you're a retard

>He used this science to predict the superiority of Communism and people have been butthurt at him ever since
>This science
>Philosophy is science when Marx does it
>Mfw people actually believe this

Science is philosophy.

Somebody doesn't understand how subsets work.

This happens all the time at my school for interesting speakers that I'd want to see but are never advertised anywhere except by word of mouth. The only one I've managed to catch was Ursula Le Guin, who I only knew was speaking because I happened to be taking a scifi lit class at the time and the prof mentioned it

I do, you don't.
Back to r/eddit.

hurka durka will to troof if better than urs so urs is part of mine haha

Science is a subset of philosophy. All science is philosophy, but not all philosophy is science. I'm amazed I have to point this out.

>illiteracy

You really have to be special kind of retarded to deny this.

t. r/eddit

There was a huge thread on him here yesterday dawg and there were sundry references of his visiting UCLA the following day (today). If you don't browse this board frequently, you probably missed it.

>everything I don't like is reddit

>arguments are good
t. reddit

>I have no actual argument so get back to plebbit illiterate lamo ecks dee :3
You sound very convincing. How are you bullied in your high school?

see:

>Wants to call philosophy a science
>Arguments are the groundwork of all science
>Tries to philosophize without an argument

I didn't say that, mongboi
>arguments are good because le greek boifucker said so

>>Arguments are the groundwork of all science

Not even close to true

>Arguments aren't good because I say so
I'll take le greek boifucker over you any day.

>Science is applied maths
>Maths is applied logic
>Logic is formal argument

tfw rejected from UCLA

>>Science is applied maths
Nope
>>Maths is applied logic
Nope
>>Logic is formal argument
Nope

I recommend you actually read some philosophy of science instead of just relying on platitudes you heard on reddit

>Many respected scientists say this
>Many respected mathematicians say this
>Many respected logicians say this
I'll grant that these things are controversial, but they're not objectively false.

>it's the same autist being contrarian with zero arguments every time
I've seen you a lot. How do you reach these levels of autism? Do you actually enjoy it or are there too many suicidal thoughts? Would you recommend?

Easy on the projection lad

except Communism is a repeatedly demonstrated failure