Being so retarded that you can't solve this

>being so retarded that you can't solve this
Who else ans = 29?

thought process behind your answer?

I got 22

honestly if you have to ask, you wouldn't understand

22 I guess

It's 22.

22 duh

22 if you add the numbers from the bottom 2 crosses

>Who else ans = 29?
>being so retarded that you can't solve this

wrong answer. 22 ignores top right and top left crosses thus is not a pattern

SPOILER: Take the three smallest numbers in the corresponding locations of each outer cross and add them up. This gives you the value in the corresponding location in the inner cross.

if you apply my algorithm you get 22

dumbest post on Veeky Forums currently
is correct
ans = 29

so you can't

great thread

im confused it works, doesn't it?

myAlg(1,6,7,8) = 14
myAlg(1,3,4,7) = 8
myAlg(1,5,6,11) = 12
myAlg(3,9,12,21) = 24
myAlg(2,9,11,13) = ...22

dumbest reply on Veeky Forums currently

pure coincidence, like how the middle number is three times the top number

22, 29, 13, whatever the fuck you want because there isn't a "correct pattern".

easy route?

how is it pure coincidence when this is a pattern searching question... if the pattern works then it works

Wrong, add top crosses to get bottom left. Subtract top crosses to get bottom right.

and then you just neglect the middle cross.

Even if it isn't the intended answer, it is an answer that logically works in all of the cases so it must be an answer.

The best solution to a problem is usually the easiest one.

pattern or algorithm? I'll let yall choose.

I got 22

I got 22 because the second highest number on a specific tile of the 4 outer crosses times 2 equals the specific tile of the cross in the center

More alpha approach.