>being so retarded that you can't solve this
Who else ans = 29?
Being so retarded that you can't solve this
thought process behind your answer?
I got 22
honestly if you have to ask, you wouldn't understand
22 I guess
It's 22.
22 duh
22 if you add the numbers from the bottom 2 crosses
>Who else ans = 29?
>being so retarded that you can't solve this
wrong answer. 22 ignores top right and top left crosses thus is not a pattern
SPOILER: Take the three smallest numbers in the corresponding locations of each outer cross and add them up. This gives you the value in the corresponding location in the inner cross.
if you apply my algorithm you get 22
dumbest post on Veeky Forums currently
is correct
ans = 29
so you can't
great thread
im confused it works, doesn't it?
myAlg(1,6,7,8) = 14
myAlg(1,3,4,7) = 8
myAlg(1,5,6,11) = 12
myAlg(3,9,12,21) = 24
myAlg(2,9,11,13) = ...22
dumbest reply on Veeky Forums currently
pure coincidence, like how the middle number is three times the top number
22, 29, 13, whatever the fuck you want because there isn't a "correct pattern".
easy route?
how is it pure coincidence when this is a pattern searching question... if the pattern works then it works
Wrong, add top crosses to get bottom left. Subtract top crosses to get bottom right.
and then you just neglect the middle cross.
Even if it isn't the intended answer, it is an answer that logically works in all of the cases so it must be an answer.
The best solution to a problem is usually the easiest one.
pattern or algorithm? I'll let yall choose.
I got 22
I got 22 because the second highest number on a specific tile of the 4 outer crosses times 2 equals the specific tile of the cross in the center
More alpha approach.