>John Nash
>One of the best mathematicians of the 20th century
>Has brainlet tier handwriting
Why?
John Nash
Because handwriting is not a predictor of intelligence?
Fuck you op
t. brainlet with same handwriting
I think you're wrong you fucking brainlet
He's obviously a brain let moron, just because he's autistic about mat doesn't make him smart, and judging by that handwriting
He was a low low retarded freak who could barely construct a letter, and that shitty hand writing should discredit his shitty work in mathematics
mfw my handwriting looks very similar to that. I must be fucking smart as heck bois
Brainlet* math*
Fuck you
Quality thread. Good discussion.
Post handwriting.
I bet you think art professors are smart too because they can make pretty pictures.
>Dijkstra
>Pioneer in computer science
>Aesthetic handwriting
How can math even recover?
>Aesthetic handwriting
>looks like comic sans
Hmmm....... appears the brainlet is truly you, OP.
umad???
cause brain damage fucks with your hand writing
>that is the complete letter
also, lmao at the fact that the entire first sentence is basically
>p-pls respond
The guy was an ass
t. Nash
Bad handwriting is actually very slightly correlated with IQ (r = 0.08, if I recall)
Overall, it's not a good predictor of IQ. Care to show why you think otherwise?
...
>you write your r's in the same way
>you have trouble formatting your words in a straight and uniformly sized sentence
>you also randomly connect some letters while not connecting others
>yet still felt the need to come up with a cursive signature which looks like it's straight out of the 17th century
Thank you for reminding me that my handwriting is trash, OP.
What do you consider good handwriting, OP?