>peer-review does not work >funding is not fully disclosed >so-called researchers deny ties to related industries, even when they got funded >99% of studies are bullshit, scientists are forced to publish results, even if there aren't any, in the most outstanding journals, just to make a living >it's fucking easy to manipulate studies, MSM won't even care about details
This gave me sickness and suicidal thoughts. Everything is fake and even the slightest profit is clearly prioritized, but people are still rambling as if they know shit.
Isaiah Carter
Stupid brainlet understands nothing about the beauty of the Scientific Method(TM) so he goes full damage control.
All the shit you talk about is negligible minority in the vast ocean of honesty and interest for progresw that is the scientific community. Come back when you watched NDT's show about why science is cool. heh
Ian Jenkins
Maybo you shouldn't compare social studies to STEM fields.
Lincoln Jenkins
/thread
Charles Hall
Lets check this statement.
>peer-review does not work
Just look at historical revisionist, also psychologist that constantly demenean their field for this reason.
>funding is not fully disclosed
Just see journalism studies
>so-called researchers deny ties to related industries, even when they got funded
Check economists, they are along the lines of intelectual whoring with the economists and lawyers
% of studies are bullshit, scientists are forced to publish results, even if there aren't any, in the most outstanding journals, just to make a living
Have to justify my existence in the philosophy department
>it's fucking easy to manipulate studies, MSM won't even care about details
Which works for sociologists and people on political science just wanting to make a buck.
I would say that the statement is quite true, well donde OPBTFO!
Christian Sullivan
science should be left to aristocracy.
Elijah Perry
Lets check this statement.
>peer-review does not work Only 10% of research results in physics, chemistry and biology is actually replicable.
>funding is not fully disclosed Just see environmental sciences
>so-called researchers deny ties to related industries, even when they got funded Check climate science and all the shady business with their data tampering to fit the agenda
>99% of studies are bullshit, scientists are forced to publish results, even if there aren't any, in the most outstanding journals, just to make a living Journals are reluctant to publish studies with null results as they are not exciting, hence why researchers have to find correlations and causations where there aren't any with practices such as data snooping, to be able to keep their funding and an employment, which ties it directly to point one.
>it's fucking easy to manipulate studies, MSM won't even care about details Indeed lack of skepticism and scientific illiteracy are well documented in pop-sci circles
Well done you BTFO yourself
Wyatt Lewis
...
Dominic Miller
>Only 10% of research results in physics, chemistry and biology is actually replicable. Only 1% of the claims of whatever popsci garbage site you got this falsehood from are accurate.
Zachary Davis
>assumes there's legit science
Brayden Cook
It's actually based on real science.
Adrian Hill
Are you telling me that you are trusting science to say that science can't be trusted?
Xavier Diaz
Mmmm no it's not. Bet you $100 this claim is taken from one anecdote that doesn't even have to do with physics or chemistry, if it's based on anything at all.
Christopher Thomas
>Only 10% of research results in physics, chemistry and biology is actually replicable and how the fuck do you know that?
Hunter Anderson
EASY
Logan Myers
It's a nobrainer to conclude that most studies are plain wrong. It's fucking easy to know like how many studies got replicated and how many not. fucking wow
Jaxon Ramirez
but the ncbi thing is just one paper and it looks like it only mentions medicine/biology studies
Ayden Peterson
Are you really that dim? I meant that the evidence is fucking out there, and I wouldn't need to look further into stuff just to understand that "science" is just another corrupt and tyrannical instance of authority with no regard to common sense. There are free research papers at a TOR website, it's legitimate and safe to use, it is supported by honorable members of the scientific community. I would even go further and rather download some spyware-ridden research data than rely on information that is accessible to the public, reviewed by greedy fucks who won't give a shit.
Isaac Hughes
>I meant that the evidence is fucking out there so you meant you actually have none? that's what i thought
Camden Jackson
>I would even go further and rather download some spyware-ridden research data than rely on information that is accessible to the public What did he mean by this?
Mason Peterson
OK so show me the data, since its so easy.
Brandon Turner
>peer-review does not work Peer review only works if your peers are actual peers, ie., if they are actually competent. Nobody gets to be the authority that stands up and says, "You're all incompetent poopheads," until they've designed an experiment that demonstrates that fact. (And often times it is a fact.) >funding is not fully disclosed It doesn't need to be. Bias in research can be easily detected by (competent/real) peer review. If a corporation wants to waste money funding bunk science, that's their loss. >so-called researchers deny ties to related industries, even when they got funded Because they aren't conscious of their biases. Get into psychology if you want to solve that problem. Systemic problems have no easy answers and you won't get one by complaining. >99% of studies are bullshit Preliminary work doesn't have the highest epistemic qualities, no. >scientists are forced to publish results Forced publication need not be peer reviewed, since it's nonsense and wastes time until someone forms a valid (testable) hypothesis. >just to make a living It's not a bad thing if we've reached the echelons of publicly funded market-force science. >it's fucking easy to manipulate studies, MSM won't even care about details Nobody cares about mainstream media. Not in academia, not in popular culture, and not among the general public.
>people are still rambling as if they know shit They will, always, do that, no matter what you do or do not do.
