Why are so many pornstars interested in philosophy?

Why are so many pornstars interested in philosophy?

Who is your favorite pornstar philosopher?

Mine is Valentina Nappi:

>"Often referred to as an "intellectual pornstar", Nappi wrote several essays on the condition of men and women in contemporary society and attended a philosophy festival."

I can't take coalburners seriously.

Leah Gotti

It's the clearest example of women doing things just for validation. Schopenhauer was right.

interracial sex is the thinking mans fetish. I see why you can't take them seriously you cuck.

Not even Charlotte Sartre?

She even has N A U S E A tattooed on her belly and includes Ligotti on her amazon wishlist :3

Demonizing female sexuality is a spook. Woman who realize they can capitalize on their sexuality and make mad bank off it are patrician and are naturally attracted to patrician fields

Obviously it's all the free time they have between shoots or after an early retirement.
Usually to do with relationships, isn't it?

The taboo makes it kinky and therefore in demand.

People do things. They attempt to communicate with one another.

Nope. But I don't patronize the exploitative businessmen behind neither.

>mad bank

Lol do you realize how little pornstars earn? There was a thread on /gif/ just recently where a pornstar did an impromptu AMA after an old highschool classmate was shitposting on there about her and she was lurking and answered a bunch of questions and confirmed she had pretty much no money. And she is relatively mainstream. Can't think of her name but she's been on BLACKED and usually does sister-incest stuff.

Coalburner AND attention-whore? Even worse.

Quite the intellectual.

Capitalization is a spook
mad bank is a spook
patrician is a spook

No honestly, I'm not a redpilled fedoralord, but I unironically think that there is a case to be made that highly promiscuous people have poor character traits, women even more so than men.

I don't buy from them either, but something tells me you're not anarchist

This was mostly shitposting. I agree the most of porn probably runs off of abusive business practices and capitalizing on vulnerable/stupid/naive girls, but I think they're have been a handful of porn stars who have done things similar to what I said. Sasha Grey comes to mind as a person who made a decent amount off of porn and seems to be doing fine, Remy LaCroix is another example who pretty much fucked her way through nursing school and then quit. Emily Grey only fucked her boyfriend then retired to be a camgirl.

pic related

Actually I am, but I am against condescending corruption, not in favor of banning consensual decisions thou.

Maybe is not the entire industry, but among the worst things I've heard the producers do is the deceit to entrap innocent girls into the business.

This woman deserves a chance for success. She tries so hard to leave behind her past as pornstar and make herself a career as actress.

OH! Nice.

I've come in contact with a few anarchists who accused me of "slut-shaming". In the end I called them crypto-liberals.

Pretty obvious why.

It's compensation. Everyone thinks porn stars are retarded, so if you're a porn star, and you're vain, and it's not enough for you that you have a hot body, and you brood about how people are going to think you're dumb because you're a porn star, then what you do is you start to flaunt how, actually, in your free time, you read esoteric smart-people books, actually. And you feel powerful, defying people's expectations, not allowing them to put you in a box. It's a preemptive strike against the charge of stupidity. It's a response to the whole male "You have sexual power over me, but I don't take you seriously as a person." Their response is, "I have sexual power over you, and I read philosophy, so you have to take me seriously as a person too."

Furthermore, we usually think of beauty and intelligence as separate, and think of people who combine them as extraordinary, like Gods. These porn stars know they have the beauty down, and they're Goddesses for that alone, and most are satisfied with that, but some aren't, they want even more; they want to make a go at ascending into an even rarer and exclusive category: body and brains. And what you see here in these cases are a bunch of attempts to do just that, to convince people that they occupy that rare category, even if they actually don't.

They are fucking posers defending big corporations who exploit people. Nothing but garbage.

This is point by point, about who is making a legitimate business and who is using people as a mere object. Condescending exploitation is not being an anarchist, and I am sure is not even being an anacap, but a scum.

What do those people will say about sweatshops? Will they think is ok to leave those business be because "is consensual"?

They need to validate their existence as glorified prostitutes by engaging in what normie society considers to be a smart people's thing - philosophy, psychology, history, sociology etc

That said, the things I'd do to lick Valentina Nappi's pusy..

>blacksonblondes watermark
>girl has dark hair
what did they mean by this?

This.

Sasha Grey has an IQ way above the level of genius.

For entertainment, she watches the films of Fassbinder, Herzog, Truffaut, Godard, Bertolucci, Mallick amongst other even more obscure artists.

She understands the hypocrisy of contemporary morality and has exploited it to become a millionaire.

Veeky Forums has every superhero movie on Bluray.

I'm a long-time (5 year) subscriber to Dogfart (TM) and its affiliated sites and I've yet to hear a reasonable answer to this question. It never fails to amuse me when I receive an email informing me of new content for the Blacks On Blondes series, only to discover the star of the latest scene is a brunette or even redheaded (!). It's like when I watch a scene from Watching My Mom Go Black yet the dialogue, probably for legal reasons though it may just be bad acting, doesn't even make reference to the fact that the white male actor is supposed to be the son of the female lead. It's pretty poor. There's even an episode of Watching My Daughter Go Black, which is part one of Dogfart's (TM) series, where the supposed daughter isn't even the same race as her supposed father. How the hell are viewers supposed to invest in these performances psychologically if the context is just so appallingly mismanaged?

lmfao

I'm sure they're all about the free agent hooker/dancer/pornstar, but that doesn't matter to me. The capitalist angle is what makes it shameful. Sex is a pleasure not a business.

I think they just banged all the blonds in the business. No reason to change the name of your site

She already has success. She's the best writer this century has produced

>Craig posting
My man

>generalizing sex workers as self-interested whores because they worked in the sex industry
>de-humanizing women for their lives without knowing why and what for of their choices

>and trying to be funny after that by being sexist

Are intellectual women ever sexually reserved? It seems rare.

>Intellectual
>Women

Pornstars may be beautiful in physical aspects, but beauty as in an ethereal sense is often attributed with purity and physical immunity and that's what actually attracts humans. That's why most of the mhytical beauties are considered as maidens in lore. On the other hand, corporeal beauty is used as a mere tool for it's owner. You can easily sell or trade it for your own desires. Furthermore, this notion and the earthly decadence of this attribute often causes a scorn and the sense of unworth against it's owner. That's why we always dream to lay with a Victoria's Secret model and not an Amsterdam hooker despite of their physical attributes are often the same.

>Intellectual
>frogposter

Calling women who fuck niggers on camera whores isn't sexism, it's a dictionary definition

It seems rare because they have liberate themselves or come from a liberated upbringing in order to get any "intellectual" respect.

And do you consider Curie, Woolf or Arendt not suitably intelligent or chaste enough? Maybe your metric is the problem.

Calling idiot to people who generalize is not wrong, it's a dictionary definition.

>>>Reddit.com

>>>Reddit.com

>Hey user again thanks for those books oh! can you take me to the film set? i have to doit with a black dude today i forget about it :))

lmao get on my level faggot
i can't take women seriously

you're such a pretty desolate little mock rock grayling, fake butterfly with a trip; show us your feet and we'll make you our favourite philosopher pornstar, just like you always wanted, i promise.
does hipparchia count?

>he calls whores to all women
>he probably only dates prostitutes

No wonder you are a misogynist motherfucker.

>Being so female that you can't even into grammar when you're mad
Lmaoing @ ur life

>"Lmaoing @ ur life"

No doubt foreign.
This place harbors so many slackers in English though. No sense of spelling (capitalization) even.
Petty frogger.

I was pleasantly surprised desu, that professional fuckers line is clever.

Maybe.

>so many

I don't know that is the case. I'd expect in any profession you'll find people interested in philosophy. Pornstars just happen to be public figures, so they get interviewed and what not. You'll never hear about plumbers who like to read philosophy or farmers who like to paint etc.

There is also a cliche "role reversal" happening. People expect porn stars to be dumb, so it's notable when they do something intellectual.

And fuck everyone who is shaming sex workers in this thread, especially because you probably consume their work.

>he literally gets money for pleasure herself
Thats pretty smart if you ass me.

/thread

you're such a pseud, a real fine white knight specimen with your shitty meme picture. I bet you have an average looking boring gf somewhere, who fucked more people than you and you talk to her about reading Harry Potter. Or you're just a woman

what are you, every asshole's white knight?

The really smart women I know are mostly very reserved. the pseuds are not.

...

Look kid, you can stop pretending you are an alpha male. Your samefagging is noticing.

>shaming
i think you've mistaken a Maltesan iceskating forum for a public trial or some shit.
Their work is public, so there's no reason why they shouldn't be shamed or praised or whatever. That's how it is and they know it. Stop defending them and just think everyone here still watches porn. I bet you would like your daughter to look up to them. Or are you one of those who don't want children because they're a burden.

or is it you?
>noticing.
Stopped reading there. I'm not pretending and that was my first post. Nice try tho, but I guessed better about you, didn't I?

Go home johnny boy.

This is my home

>. I bet you would like your daughter to look up to them.

I wouldn't encourage anyone to work in the pornography industry, mostly because it can be very abusive, exploitative and sometimes unhealthy. But I wouldn't shame any person (my daughter or whoever) for doing this work.

Ideally, it'd become a well regulated and well paid industry. It obviously isn't going away.

I do have friends who do sex work, moslty came modeling or stripping. This kind of labor is generally safer.

what is maltesan iceskating?

>Stopped reading there
Well, that's where his post ended.

>sex work
Tippity toppity meme

>Swallows semen on camera for money
>intellectual

>swallows his own semen for free
genius

they give up on society and have existential unease much sooner in life than most academics.

>Nappi wrote several essays on the condition of men and women in contemporary society and attended a philosophy festival
wew, she's a brainiac

Porneaux allows for a lot of downtime once you're finished with your shoots. If you're even slightly intellectually inclined, this ain't a bad gig; f you're really invested you can even still tangentially be a part of academia.

A lot of people still aren't going to take you seriously because they've seen your asshole though.

>Sasha Grey has an IQ way above the level of genius.
>For entertainment, she watches the films of Fassbinder, Herzog, Truffaut, Godard, Bertolucci, Mallick amongst other even more obscure artists.
It's hard me to discern any irony here. Even more obscure than GODARD? Impossible, he's a well-guarded secret

I wanna read these essays.

This is on point. Gangster/thug types that want to be taken seriously do the same thing.

>Sasha a nice girl she didn't do nuffin

What is your opinion of Jayden Jaymes' body of work?

Pretty hot

If Veeky Forums gets infected with cuckposters im fucking leaving Veeky Forums

Ruined /pol/ for me already

>mince words
>beat around the bush.


*sigh*

It's just a way of trying to compensate for being a degenerate whore.

that text says blacksonblondes.com but however she's not a blonde. what is this

You act as though this is some kind of non-sequitur. Why do countless women read and engage in 'feminist' ideas? It's posturing. I'd feel bad for them if them if it wasn't so pathetic.

Go back to tumblr or reddit you bleeding heart faggot.

Because it's easy, can pin someone under an ocean of pressure, and the word "platonic" is practically sexual

...

having a taboo fetish has less to me doing some shameful things in my life

licentiousness is hip

most meme female authors are whores writing about their cock carousel adventures too

>"Often referred to as an "intellectual pornstar"

l-fucking-mao dude

yeah once the gates of a job is open to the plebs, then the salaries decrease

Autistic guys go to Veeky Forums
Autistic women become pornstars

>Nappi wrote several essays on the condition of men and women in contemporary society and attended a philosophy festival

You say this like it should make her worth listening to. I've wrote essays and attended literary/philosophical festivals but at the end of the day I'm still the guy that insists on having his Big Mac without pickles.

Is that what she fantasized about while licking toilets? Man, she must be quite traumatized.

They actually don't make a lot of money. That's why most pornstars also whore themselves on the side.

>But I wouldn't shame any person (my daughter or whoever) for doing this work.
Fuck you. I hope you never have children.

Would you link to that thread, please?

This was surprising empathic for this site.

It isn't posturing because the majority aren't vocal or obvious about it, or don't even talk about it.

They engage with feminist ideas because it concerns them.

I'm not the same user. But it's just a body. It's made for fucking. Get over your weird (quasi-christian) insecurities.

You know using a few cliches doesn't auto disqualify something as being good, right?

>But I wouldn't shame any person (my daughter or whoever) for doing this work.

You are so absolutely full of shit. Deep down you'd be mad as shit about your own daughter doing it and you know it too. Enough of your bullshit virtue signalling you fake fuck.

lmao

that doesn't somehow make you complicit lol lil bitch boy

>it's just a body!
>99% of people who haven't been seriously dosed in modernist propaganda lose their shit and beat/disown their kid and the entire family structure collapses
>AND this occurs throughout nearly all human cultures


at some point you need to think it's

1. Natural for sexual deviants and pariahs to be disowned or even killed by their family/parent culture

2. They are set aside as pleasure stock and die really young/or die completely alone as cast off prostitutes


If you were a real naturalist you'd go full Hitler. It's pseudo-christianity that keeps all this garbage about sexual freedom going