RIGHT-WING LITERATURE

I can't find many title apologizing:
>Eugenics
>Ethno-state
>Fascism
>Anti-Semitism

Anyone has authors other than Plato and Hitler?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Revolutionary_movement
docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/pub
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Anthony Ludovici is great

Fascism and Anti-Semitism are both pretty stupid though, still much better than the democratic anti-racism of today

my diary desu

Kill yourself.

Canterbury Tales

Anything about ancient greeks

Daily reminder: always start with the greeks

Even Dumas was anti-Semitic, political correctness is a modern social rule not a de facto one.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conservative_Revolutionary_movement
You can find many right-wing authors from the German Conservative revolution of the 1920s.

Ernst Junger, Ernst von Salomon, Oswald Spengler, and Carl Schmitt are a good place to start.

rousseau, evola, guenon, ortega, nemirovsky, kevin macdonald... there's lots of them

Some ideas may be right, but the whole package can only lead to violence, death and wars. Do you enjoy such things?

Richard Lynn wrote a good book advocating for modern day eugenics.
Most of Mosley's books deal with defending and advocating for at least his style of fascism.
Martin Luther had a good book on the jews, PotLEZ is an interesting book that you can take in jest because it has been debunked as fake but its still relevant imo
and I haven't gotten to read it but check out "Ethnonationalism" by Walker Connor, looks interesting

Your description of right-wing is way too memeish as if you're trying to paint all right-wingers as crazy Nazis. Meanwhile this book truly depicts a lot of right wing values. He is an anarcho-capitalist who believes in complete private property, and thus will allow privately owned cities and towns to control their own immigration and culture.

linkola

If you complain about consequences then Socialism and Communism are the big death tally winners. I do not like violence, which is happening to Whites globally. Getting raped in Europa, South Africa and the USA, we need to protect our own.

Massive culling of earth's population when?

Isn't justifying an ethno-state one of the most common threads of right wing thought? I would have figured the vast majority of right wing authors would support that. They think that white people are responsible for creating western civilization and thus they want white people to be the dominant ethnic group in their societies.

>They think that white people are responsible for creating western civilization and thus they want white people to be the dominant ethnic group in their societies.
That is a fact not a desire or delusion.Modern world was built by the white race.

>Eugenics
>Ethno-state
>Fascism
>Anti-Semitism

>Junger

This triggers me.

>>Eugenics
not going to get many of these. Social Darwinism, California, and the Third Reich are your only hopes.
>>Ethno-state
Rousseau talks about this explicitly, but for most of history this was taken more or less as a first principle, so its not mentioned often. Look up Jus Sanguinis. You should easily be able to find examples of a polity conferring benefits only to its citizens, and citizenship being relatively exclusionary.
>>Fascism
again, only exists in the 20th century. Plenty of right wing apologists for socialism throughout history though, Augustine and Hobbes among them.
>>Anti-Semitism
literally every Gentile writer pre-Holocaust.

Right-wing is objectively wrong

and you are objectively autistic

...

>Communism
I'm not going to defend Communism because I don't really like it and Communism =/= equality, but:
1) Communism has never promoted racism and discrimination towards individuals or minorities
2) The Soviet Union was forced by circumstances to take part to the conflict
3) Stalin was a madman with a very low intelligence, his actions are irrelevant for this discussion

>I do not like violence, which is happening to Whites globally
Did you ever think that white people perpetrated crimes and violence against the rest of the world for centuries, thank to the Spanish and English Imperialism (without which the UK nowadays would be nothing, an absolute nothing, not to say an irrelevant little excrement on the surface of Earth)?

Practically everyone believed in the concept of an ethno-state until like 1960.

Found the cuck

A political movement is not attributable of good or evilness, just as you can't compare dogmas. They exist and you have to respect them or argue against it at some level, but you will never eradicate ideas just because you don't like them.


Hitler did nothing wrong, a picture says it all. Paris is now a rotten third world hell hole, people are raped, stabbed. Infrastructure is no longer take care, Somali immigrants sleep in the floor, police can't go to ghettos without getting murdered.

The Nazis were ahead of their time, they foresaw our reality. The white extinction, and its western culture of civilization.

t. butthurt Anglo

Define right-wing.

Define my ass

Death to all Jews.

Social and economic conservatism

This is a dumb question but why are Hitler and Ayn Rand both considered right wing? They seem completely different and yet most people would, without a second thought, put them both on the right side of the spectrum

Economically

dumb post

Hitler's right-wing by virtue of fascism being considered right-wing mostly because commies were butthurt over Mussolini's defection

...

...

Why would you have that picture saved? Fuck off back to r.eddit

So you think that preferring to maintain the policies, traditions, and institutions that made the country successful is objectively wrong 100% of the time? Because that is what you are implying when you say "social and economic conservatism is objectively wrong"

...

Racism is wrong.

All communist states went down the same road, not just the soviet union. And I would call putting wrong-thinkers in gulags and Castro putting gay people in working camps indeed discrimination against individuals and collective groups.

Right wing does not demand racism

...

Whites need to pay reparations for slavery.

OP demands racism

And that's why people are replying with flowers.

...

...

That's not the entire right wing though, that's just the predominant right wing ideology in the US. A small part of the giant spectrum of right wing ideologies around the globe (and even in the US).

factually accurate, but i still think nazis deserve criticism for making problems in areas where there weren't, yet. Obviously, you have to take history as it's given to you, but /ourboys/ weren't flawless either

...

...

...

...

kys nazi

...

Curtis Yarvin

This.

Schmitt is okay though.

Can mods please delete this thread? Go back to /pol/ this is a safe-space free of hate speech.

...

Fuck off this is about literature

Because they were both in favor of capitalism. Though Hitler less than Rand, he was actually quite socialist for his time. He was more of a centrist than a right winger, but fascism and natsoc gets conflated with right wingers for name-calling purposes, just like the entire left gets conflated with communism.

The leftist is antagonistic to the concept of competition because, deep inside, he feels like a loser.

>Plato

Don't drag the ancients into your Hegelian political philosophy bullshit.

thanks Ted

>Hitler in favour of Capitalism

Because most people don't know what the true right is. Hitler would be a prime example of The True Right. It's about honor, natural order, unity, Tradition. Not necessarily about race or going genocidal but those are always the most fun.
Then there's modern mainstream conservatives who are either just
>Muh taxes
>Muh abortions
And don't really care about much else. They are the remnants of classical liberals. Libertarians are basically turbo-charged classical liberals.

the camp of the saints

Another imbecile that takes his facts from Jewish cinema propaganda.

Listen clueless sodomite, Plato was the first mixing eugenics with public policies. Greeks despise their European peers for their lack of cities and arts and the Eastern races for their sexual depravation, lack of logos and religious extremism.

Do you feel the competition?

I'm from /pol/ myself. Surprising you can't find anything so I'll spoon-feed you like a little baby.
The Protocols of the Elders of Zion
The Turner Diaries – Andrew MacDonald
Hunter – Andrew MacDonald
The Doctrine of Fascism – Benito Mussolini
The International Jew – Henry Ford
The Jews – Hilaire Belloc
The Camp of the Saints – Jean Raspail
The Culture of Critique – Kevin B. MacDonald
Racial Realities in Europe – Lothrop Stoddard
The Rising Tide of Color Against White World-Supremacy – Lothrop Stoddard
The Jews and Their Lies – Martin Luther
The Greater Britain – Oswald Mosley
The Alternative – Oswald Mosley
Europe: Faith and Plan – Oswald Mosley
The Decline of the West – Oswald Spengler
Hitler’s Revolution – Richard Tedor
Also regardless of your interests start with the Greeks if you haven't done so properly already. And check out the Philosophy guide.
docs.google.com/document/d/1y8_RRaZW5X3xwztjZ4p0XeRplqebYwpmuNNpaN_TkgM/pub
>The Nazis were ahead of their time, they foresaw our reality. The white extinction, and its western culture of civilization.
There have been many people that predicted it all before the National Socialist, they weren't really ahead of their time desu.

Ya, gonna have to stop you there bud.

...

...

>Greeks despise their European peers for their religious extremism
>Kill Socrates for blasphemy

Right-wingers everyone

Do you have an actual argument?

Not that guy but Hitler was objectivly not a socialist. Socialism was the cool thing back then so everyone claimed they were socialist but the vast majority of people had no idea what it actually was. Just a vague idea of gimme dats.

no right wing ideals are allowed on my safe space board

You don't get the difference between books and reality, kiddo. Communism never incite racism and discrimination, while the books you're looking for (or OP, it doesn't matter) actually do.

...

>Eastern races

Learn2Read

Socrates was killed after a trial, unfair but a trial at least.

>Communism never incite racism and discrimination
>When /pol/ and Veeky Forums battles it out to see whose more retarded and Veeky Forums wins

Dood just totally kill me so I can prove a point lmao- Socrates

And yet, way more people died. A bad idea is worse than an uncomfortable one.

>The original "Twenty-Five Point Programme" of the party, adopted in 1920, listed several economic demands (including "the abolition of all incomes unearned by work," "the ruthless confiscation of all war profits," "the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations," "profit-sharing in large enterprises," "extensive development of insurance for old-age," and "land reform suitable to our national requirements")

Not to mention all of the government-created jobs which basically eradicated unemployment in the reich. I don't know on what planet you are living, but I would call this shit socialist.

DELET THIS

So? They still killed him on religious grounds. Meanwhile Zoroastrian Empires (pssst that would be EASTERN empires) tolerated Hellenistic pagans and Jews without persecution.

Hey idiot, your nonsense Left vs Right division of politics is a modern invention. Both fascism and socialism are direct descendants of Hegel's stupid philosophy. Hence both Giovanni Gentile and Ludwig Feuerbach.

Also, the Greeks were some of the most open of anyone to examining the ideas and cultures of those around them. They condemned what they saw as bad and praised what they saw as good.

...

>Did you ever think that white people perpetrated crimes and violence against the rest of the world for centuries, thank to the Spanish and English Imperialism (without which the UK nowadays would be nothing, an absolute nothing, not to say an irrelevant little excrement on the surface of Earth)?

Ok, so immigration and racial displacement is a punishment for colonialism then?

Punishment = something bad

Punishment = immigration and racial displacement (in this case)

Therefore: immigration and racial displacement = bad

Thank you for making my case for me.

Before this thread gets deleted anybody wanna clue me in on Maurrasianism? French Reactionarism seems well developed in comparison to other countries.

A hen is smarter than you

...

I love Botticelli's flowers

Nice "argument"

Can we make this a Botticelli thread :)

Nice melon

...

of course :)