Does quantum entanglement not majorly fuck with causality?

Then how the fuck would you know they're entangled in the first place?

learn more about quantum tunneling, this will give you sleepless nights if you think about casuality.
particals arrive on a point before they even started moving.

Create an entangled pair of particles (such that one of them is in state A and the other in state B, with equal probabilities, but you don't know which one), send one particle away and observe the one you keep. Do this many times to find a success rate where you correctly predict the state of the second particle after having measured the state of the fist particle. If this success rate is greater than 50%, which would be the success rate if you were just randomly guessing, you know you have found a method to entangle particles.

You entangle particles by pairing/grouping them together so that you know their "total" state. A measurement of one particle in the group automatically gives you information about the state of the remaining part, because the two parts must sum up to the total.

Entanglement can be expressed mathematically which is why we know when systems exhibit it. In quantum computing a system of two qubits is entangled if the state of the system cannot be expressed as a tensor product of states. In computing the only possible state each individual bit can be is 0 or 1. In quantum computing this is extended to qubits which are linear combinations of 0 and 1 states, expressed as |0> and |1>. Now a state of two qubits in the 1 state is |11>=|1>X|1> where X is a tensor product. This state is a perfectly good state which can be combined with others like |00>=|0>X|0> in a linear combination to give new quantum states. An entangled state is one that cannot be expressed as a tensor product. |00>+|11> is one example. This state can be prepared, but cannot be decomposed into two states under a tensor product. We can define a flip operator x by x1>=|0> and x|0>=|1>. For two qubit states we can define an operator on it by taking tensor products of operators. (x X Id)|11>=(x X id)(|1> X |1>)=(x|1>)X(id|1>)=|0>X|1>=|01>. So for unentangled states we can operate on each qubit without effecting the other. But for entangled states which cannot be broken up into tensor products, each operation must effect both qubits together.

pic related
>its the universe

what the fuck kinda math is that

linear algebra

Dunno m8, I'm a loss as well.

Lambda is an LGBT symbol
something is divided by the male symbol
Omega (end) with a not sign

something about no gay buttsex i'm guessing

Here Murray Gell-Mann explains how entanglement does not violate causality or locality
youtube.com/watch?v=FU0L4bzdIb0

basically, the simulation raycast light particles through the universe and simply teleport them?

does anyone here think the incompatibility of classical and quantum models is a result of flawed thinking and the lack of an appropriate meta-model?

We already know that tho
Because we still need to model cases like black holes 'n shizzle

pics of black hole?

There is a unified model. We call it "Universe". So yes, we just need better models.

Classical physics is just an approximation to quantum physics, there is no need for any new theory.

it has scaling problems as a model, and neither model are well connected through quantum to nano to micro scales

So, basically; if something is being measured to be there, it's there as an abstract represention that's not actually there and it can be represented in various different ways, am I right? And if it's not there; it simply wouldn't just show up on the screen then, right? It sounds pretty passively existential right there. Holistically and metaphysically empirically speaking.

What does the symbolic logic represent and mean? What are they all measuring and looking for/defining?

an outcome of a energy proposed by one presence

.ˑ. level

causality implies non sentient being

observer presence implies sentient control action

it all is a part in a field of physics that is actually very well understood called NOBODY FUCKING KNOWS!

This is all good except you confuse the classical picture for the quantum. It's not just that we don't know what each respective state of the system is until measurement, it's that there IS no state until measurement. This obviously prompts most of the worry about action-at-a-distance

You're a man of exurb1a, I see.

define "macroscopic universe"

peak brainletism
do you really believe free will exists?
we all are slaves of causality

it shouldn't be able to transfer info instantly.

But if it can then the things developed from it could be insanely useful.

tf bruh

Their IS a state till measurements. This is one of the basic axioms of QM.

"The state psi holds all physical information about a given system"

That's not what quantum tunnelling is. Quantum tunnelling is a particle's position wavefunction being continuous across a potential barrier with height higher than the energy of the particle.

Of course it has "scaling problems". It's an approximation that gets better the greater the scale

Anything bigger than your dick

"Information" is just a way of describing a certain part of the universe. It's not real, and it's laws can totally be violated without consequence. It's pretty much just a placeholder.

Example
Ship 1 departs from planet a traveling at 96% of C
After a while planet b sends a missile barrage towards ship 1
Planet a sees this and trips their emergency quantum alarm
Ship 1 is instantly informed of the situation, even tho in their frame of reference it has yet to happen

>internet lag = time travel

T. Doesn't know about frame shift