Share your edgiest, most contrarian literary opinions

Share your edgiest, most contrarian literary opinions

pynchon and dfw are complete hacks
im a pretty conventional guy

Literature is not that important.

If I could do it all over again I would have started with the Greeks.

Tolstoy and Dostoevski are equally good writers

Ulyssess boring as fuck desu

I'm a libertarian

All Western Literature is largely a failure for anchoring itself in the external world.

Shakespeare is nothing outside good prose, that's not a great writer

Literature was a mistake

See, I'm of the opposite opinion. The prose is fine I guess, the word play nice at times, what makes Shakespeare great in my mind is the plot, the character's arguing and debating with one another, and the humor!

Naked Lunch is the epitome of 20th century lit.

hnnnnggg

what shakespeare have you read, user? some of his works are no doubt better than others and some are solely just for masturbation to prose, but I'm unsure how you could say king lear or hamlet had poor plots.

There is nothing wrong with Harry Potter

David Foster Wallace didn't kill himself, we did

The Holy Bible is still relevant

We killed ourselves?

literature is a waste of time.
prose if fucking useless, i only care about the information the words carry.
all the meme books are utter crap.

Brief Interviews with Hideous Men was pretty mixed. Some of it was great, some of it wasn't. It's really left a bad after-taste in my mouth for David Foster Wallace though and I'm hesitant to read more of his works. I feel like his skills as a writer would have been better for writing essays and reference text books.

I'm gonna be honest with you, right now I only remember my deep hatred of Macbeth. I am sure I didn't read king lear though.

Kafka - the Trial is enormously overrated

Shakespeare is only good for the humor.

I N T E R I O R I S M

N

T

E

R

I

O

R

I

S

M

A lot of the canon are just outdated historical curios, and nothing more.

Just because they were influential doesn't mean they are still worth reading outside of historical value.

he wrote those too
(if you're willing to call Everything and More a reference text book (it's not a very good one))

books are for fags

walden was pretty boring and unmoving

>The Holy Bible is still relevant

probably the least controversial thing said in this thread desu

I strongly believe in the death of the Author

they gotta die sometime

He didn't write in prose pleb

Most words ending in "ism" or "ian" are completely useless and serve to obscure rather than clarify thoughts.

asian lit > western lit

only people who can't understand the languages disagree

There is no humor in Kafka

why can't people understand this?

do they think kafka was trying to be funny?

Stephen King did nothing wrong

This is not contrarian. Everyone I know who's read it has hated it. I think the only people who pretend to like it are those who do it in an attempt to look 2smart4u.

Shakespeare wrote in verse not prose you stupid fuck

Infinite access to information makes polymathic, esoteric tomes far less impressive in our time.

"Post-moderns," for the most part, rely on ambiguity and nonsensical scribbling to compensate for the fact that they're just worse artists and intellectuals than the modernists.

Literature is absolutely, unequivocally dying, and this is because it serves little to no purpose in the modern world.

The Recognitions should have been 300 pages.

S P O T O N
P
O
T

O
N

Over the top depression comes off as funny to normal happy individuals because it's so far off from what they can relate to.

On the Road is good.

I never even understood where people find the humor.

What does this mean? What is an example of something not grounded in the external world. Not trying to argue here. Just curious.

They saw that one DFW video on youtube and read the anecdote that Kafka was laughing when he wrote something and bada bing bada bang

Yeeeeeee boiiiiiii

Kafka reportedly found his own works hilarious.

>Everyone I know who's read it has hated it. I think the only people who pretend to like it are those who do it in an attempt to look 2smart4u.

Maybe for you, brainlet.

Source
From reading his letters and most of the stories it seems highly unlikely that humor was a theme in more than a handful of the short stories and to a degree the castle

Maybe for me what?

Free will is the most stupid concwpt being debated ecspecially by christians. Free will in the context of when you go to be judged god has the right to send you to hell for eternity. Nothing comws out of nothing so then every action since birth has been decided by previous experiences, choices based on experiences, genetics or other things inspirimg bad choices. Do you really think Hitler could have said no to killing the jews, not unless you change something that happend in his past. I know this isnt edgy to actual intellectuals but only to my dumb christian friends. Im 14 by the way so sorry for my bad grammar its not my good point.

No one should read the greeks except historians

What's to hate? I don't get it. There are a couple words and references you need to look up so you you start to convulse?
It was all just fun for me lad. Approach it like a friend.

Why

What about the Assistants in the Castle? They're slapstick goofballs

Yeah, I admit that their role in the Castle and the Castle in general, along with a handful of other short stories, might be an exception

harry potter is shit
YA is shit
DFW is shit
the greeks are shit
shakespeare is mostly shit
women are shit
women authors are shit
indian two-spirit fagbois are the extreme absolute worst shit ever undeniably
neutral on bloom
reading is boring

sorry, you must have mistaken this for the brainlet thread

Style guides for the English language, especially style guides written by Americans in the later half of the twentieth century (Strunk and White), are actually damaging to good writing, and should be ignored.

there isn't a single one of them for whom the majority of their views aren't stupid and uninformed. it's not their fault really since they lived 2000 years ago but we shouldn't bow to ancient dimwits just for the sake of "honoring the tradition" or something like that.

my (more) controversial opinion: ulysses is extremely entertaining
what does this mean? his verse was good, but his plot, characters, etc. weren't? how many productions of shakespeare have you seen?
not sure you're using the word epitome
some examples?
agree
>autism
i definitely think the metamorphosis and the castle have humorous elements. something surreal can be terrifying and hilarious, in the same way that it's both familiar and strange. penal colony, the trial, and a hunger artist can be funny as well, in a morbid way
your grammar isn't too bad, but we have to remember that words like espresso and especially don't have an extra "k" sound before the first s

Non-fictional books are more interesting than fictional books.

a shame they fucked up the ending of the bow so badly it destroys the whole look

Here's my contrarian opinion.

Pure absurdism is horrible. But mixed with slapstick, it's cool!

>lesbian

Deconstructionism is just a dressed up form of nihilism and a complete misreading of Heidegger.

Lacanian psychoanalysis is a critical lens that tells far more about those that chose to use it than any text.

Joyce was not a very good writer.

>implying lesbians aren't completely useless
who are your favorite writers?

...

Aristotle was right about literally everything, fuck you brainlet

Contrarian/Uncommon=/=Retarded
>reading in english for the prose is wasting time, talent can't make up for how shit the language is.

Greeks, Romans, and so on are trash.

Reason and such is trash.

The West is sick with the above.

>how shit the language is
In what way is it shitty? VERY genuinely curios

Heart of Darkness isn't racist and neither is Conrad.

hey... fuck you

>Greeks, Romans, and so on are trash.

Confirmed for not gonna make it.

Something being more difficult for the average reader to enjoy doesn't mean it's better.

t. brainlet

Eva Green is truly the most beautiful woman in Hollywood, hell, she’s the most beautiful woman in the entire profession of acting, if not the most beautiful woman in the world. Her dark hair, her smoky gray eyes, her perfect little pink lips, and yes, her gorgeous milky skin, are all unmatched in quality. Not anywhere in Hollywood, or the rest of the world, can one find a woman of such beauty. Along with her her physical perfection is her mental perfection; Eva overflows with sexual energy, not the loving and innocent kind, but the dark, lustful, passionate, and vulgar kind. Her lascivious energy, behavior, and appearance makes the /pol/tard enraged, as do her Jewish roots. Take for instance her casual attitude toward nude scenes, in particular her scenes in Noam Murro’s masterpiece: 300: Rise of an Empire. In the film Eva is fucked, choked, pinned against the wall, and absolutely ravished by the virile Stapleton. She takes great delight in the forceful fucking (Both her character, and the real her.), smiling and gazing at Stapleton throughout. She even goes so far as slapping Stapleton in order to make him dominate her further. All these attitudes and behaviors make the /pol/tard recoil in rage and horror. The /pol/tard cannot comprehend a woman enjoying sex, let alone revealing her true nature through it, and completely reveling in it. Truly, Eva is a woman who will not bend to any man’s will, least of all the will of a neckbearded neo-nazi who posts on obscure internet image boards founded by child pornographers. She is, in complete honesty, a strong and independent woman, and she expresses this through her sexual freedom primarily. I believe what enrages the /pol/tards the most is the fact that they will never have her (nor any Jewish goddess like her), and so they attack her on her Jewish faith and origins in order to protect their own cold, weak, and pathetic hearts.

Most of the time, it's more valuable to live your life than to escape it by reading books.

But this is true.

75-80% of what I read is nonfiction. With rare exception, all fiction is shit.

Wrong.

I really wish this didn't even have to be contrarian opinion seeing as heart of darkness isn't even about racism or niggers

Are you implying I should go outside?
If so, FUCK you

I have to admit for a kike she is pretty hot, like honorary Aryan tier desu

>cheat angle
>professional photography
>kilogram of makeup
>professional stylists
The tricks of the Jews can never surpass the inherent virtue and beauty of the white Aryan woman

>that hound
>most beautiful actress
try again bucko

Seydoux has been in fucking everything the last couple years. I used to think pretty highly of her. She's just another piece of meat these days.

to be honest i think there was a "gap" where she was doing shitty movies. her earlier stuff is pretty good and everything since sister has been great, it was just that gap where she did mission impossible and that movie about how marie antoinette was a lesbian

all art is propaganda. Art is a lie and only good liars make good artists. the rest must work. A painter gets paid to either paint a house a decent color with no stains, but an artist gets paid to paint something to either remind someone of someone else who isn't there, or create a false ideology. Art distracts us from the truth. Art creates death. As I listen to hardstyle on youtube...that's legit how I feel sometimes though. I don't take photos to be a photographer, they are documents and nothing more. I don't create music to take people away, but simply to create noise that sounds pleasing to the ear, but not to escape the inevitable...

murrican literature is one of the worst in the world

there's maybe 5 authors in this picture (these are considered the classics, and no, there's no Pynchon and other actually talented writers) that are good, not even great, just good

it's all hyped bullshit

hey, that's not henry james...

Melville, Faulkner, Steinbeck, Twain, Poe?

T H I S
H
I
S

I unironically enjoy art that was made after 1989.

GET OFF THIS FUCKING BOARD

this is also my controversial opinion pretty much except i thought it was just more of a fucking snooze for me personally.

Latin america has the best poetry of the west right now

Fuck off, Strunk.

you don't need to know words to read

David Henry Hwang is shit

Fight Club has a lot of good philosophical existential points.

I don't like shakespeare

How many of his plays have you read? You don't like a single one?