Does anyone know Lambda Calculus?
How can 2.2. be used in 2.3.? pic related
Does anyone know Lambda Calculus?
How can 2.2. be used in 2.3.? pic related
Other urls found in this thread:
homes.cs.washington.edu
twitter.com
boomp
pls help
Not doing hw for Veeky Forums and getting over the notation is more work than it's worth.
Have a look at this:
homes.cs.washington.edu
My feeling is that you induct on forms of [math]M_1[/math] and [math]M_2[/math] and case split on whether [math]x[/math] is free (it will either be free in both or neither). Then the substitution lemma enters.
1. this is about untyped lambda calculus
2. it's not homework, it's from a free pdf online written by a guy who doesn't teach anymore, henk barendergt
bomp
blomp
lambda clackulus
clackulus-bump
clackulus
what you said has literally no fucking value
there's no need to split because, if x is not in M's free variables, then M = M[ x:= N]
second, what you said is in the last paragraph is a rewording of the exercise, of course you need to use induction or modus ponens, there's a fucking implication in the screenshot you dumb pig
the exercise itself tells you to prove an induction that uses M1 and M2, more precisely M1 = M2
you are simply zero you are a dumb mongoliod a trisomic bastard a fucking cretinous retard
holy fucking shit how can you be so dumb, you have to be trolling or joking around in some form
there's no types in the exercise and what you said regarding induction is just repeating the fucking question
holy fucking shit you tremendous turdlord
you goddamned fucking cursed retard you make everyone more stupid when you breathe and exhale in the same room as them
>2 posters
well, now it's 3
oink
shut up it's not pigda
bomppor
stfu faggor
henk barendregt you stupid fucking FAGGOT!