Thoughts on juche ideals and philosophy?

Thoughts on juche ideals and philosophy?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=1qPf-zZ4eKQ
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cleanest_Race
slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2010/02/a_nation_of_racist_dwarfs.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seoul_City_Sue#Later_life
youtube.com/watch?v=IQytIoPhlA0
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

The best way to lose weight imo

...

...

>so edgy you can't decide whether you want to be a Marxist or Fascist so you chose both

Juche is at best revisionist marxism and at worst fascism. It's really just trash and the fact that tankies try to defend it is hilarious.

What's some /thinspo/ books?

What I've got so far:
Hunger by Hamsun
The Hunger Artist by Kafka
Down and Out by Orwell
One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich
The Road by McCarthy
Siddhartha by Hesse

Das Kapital by Karl "Bread Line" Marx

first post, best post

>Anti-imperialism
>Vanguard Worker's Party
>Aside from Cuba, the most firmly socialist country on the planet
>Worker's rights, universal healthcare, female reproductive rights, no discrimination, no War on Drugs, no massive incarceration

How in the fuck is it even remotely fascist? I don't think the word means what you think it means.

With the Century was great desu. Kim Il Sung was like a Korean Abe Lincoln. Leadership doesn't get better than this. He had so much humility, respect, honesty, good intentions, authenticity, devotion, etc.

Let's remember that millions of people follow a religion called Confucianism and no one says anything.

>millions of people follow a religion called Confucianism
??

>wanting to be independent and self-reliant of imperialist pig-dogs while being communal and have a fair and equal society

>"edgy"

...

Confucianism is a secular religion where 1 man's teachings are followed. No one says anything bad about Confucianism.

But when Korean people follow the teachings of Kim Il Sung, they pejoratively mock their political belief, and think it strange. It comes from a bias against socialism. If Confucius was a socialist/communist, they'd be saying he was a cult leader or dictator as well.

What country practices this "juche" thing? It can't be North Korea.

>no massive incarceration
ok kim

Right. Fascism means Drumpf and Brexit, at least that's what professor Goldenheimer says.

In case you're not joking NK is what is known in the west as Strasserism. It's still a racialist society that uses surveillance on its populace andis militaristic but it also has Marxist economics.

youtube.com/watch?v=1qPf-zZ4eKQ

Can you not lump in with all the stupid liberal democrats of your country just because you can't critically debate the point I made? Thanks.

The DPRK has had extremely good relations with the former Soviet Union and with Cuba. Neither of these countries had the same racial make-up of Korea. If they see themselves as racially superior, why do they allow non-Koreans into their country and make alliances with non-Koreans in the long-term?

Their propaganda focuses on their unity as a nation, not as a race.

>he DPRK has had extremely good relations with the former Soviet Union and with Cuba.
Nazi Germany had good relations with Spain, Italy and Japan. Doesn't make them not Fascists and racists.
>. If they see themselves as racially superior, why do they allow non-Koreans into their country and make alliances with non-Koreans in the long-term?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cleanest_Race

> It notes that the North Korean government is xenophobic and militaristic. It cites a report of a mob attack on Black Cuban diplomats and the forcing of female North Koreans to abort mixed children.[4][7]

>Their propaganda focuses on their unity as a nation, not as a race.
To NK those are one and the same.

The Cleanest Race offers an interesting angle but, from what I've heard, hardly offers a good holistic understanding of the North Korean project. Just read the "academic reception" section on the article you linked.

Crime rates in North Korea are very low because crime in general tends to be associated with property. Because this is a socialist society, there is no real need for theft or destruction of property. They have a very good educational system which also helps instill pro-social values. They are less likely to commit crimes if they have a place in their society and feel like they have worth to others.

In the US, it's all one big competition. Some get sub-par education or have to get themselves into life-long debt in order to achieve it. There is too much pressure and too much chance for failure. Things like drugs and theft motivate the American criminal, and eventually, they end up getting caught and incarcerated. The US has the highest incarceration percentage in the world, largely because of the illegal sale and consumption of drugs, which in fact is a counterfeit solution to the social problems brought on by capitalism. North Korea is the society which resolved poverty. Their happiness seems strange to everyone else who thinks hatred of their politicians is normal and selfish disdain for others is "human nature." Kim Il Sung grew up with Christian values and he lived his life like Christ, looking upon the poor and the meek with dignity, knowing how much they could achieve if they could stand up to Goliath, their oppressors, the Japanese and Americans.

If you've watched any North Korean propaganda or even their entertainment films, you'll notice how much they criticize American segregation and racist attitudes.

This book is one American guy, with no ties to Korea, trying to decipher metaphors and squeeze in innuendos into cultural media North Koreans consume. And then he tries to make one huge assumption leap out of that. Is there absolutely no racism in North Korea? Probably there is some. Is this the guiding ideology of the country? Not by far if you take the time to look at it and read it for yourself.

> Is this the guiding ideology of the country?

> the forcing of female North Koreans to abort mixed children.[4][7]

At least partially even if they don't see it that way.

It's literally alternative facts

Which North Korean law forces females to abort mixed children? I've never heard of this before.

The country is rather racially homogeneous, so I don't imagine this is even a common occurrence, if it even happens at all.

Here it's explained by Christopher Hitchens.
slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/fighting_words/2010/02/a_nation_of_racist_dwarfs.html

It has never happened, but even if it did there's no way whoever is making the accusation could prove it.

Doesn't really make sense though since it's a matter of state pride that there are DPRK citizens who are mixed race. Meaning that there are Korean citizens who see the 'correctness' of Juche but aren't Koreans/weren't born in the DPRK. "The Cleanest Race" is pure prop garbage, swill designed to sell something to idiot Americans who will believe in anything convenient.

>mfw one of my friends is a black American from Oakland who married a South Korean chick and they have a child

good summary desu

Juche is a misguided, poorly implemented, false ideal. You can't tout self-reliance as a national principle and also accept food aid from your sworn enemy. You also can't claim self-reliance and still depend on your Chinese neighbors to help keep you afloat. North Korea is a humanitarian crisis and the first world nations should be embarrassed they've allowed those people to suffer for so long. It's a fucking tragedy and I hope everyone making jokes in this thread gets cancer.

>Doesn't really make sense though since it's a matter of state pride that there are DPRK citizens who are mixed race.
They're kept segregated in a foreigner's only section though.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seoul_City_Sue#Later_life
> Jenkins reported meeting her briefly in 1965 at the "foreigners only" section of the No. 2 Department Store in Pyongyang.
Defectors to NK even claim it was segregated! You know more than people who lived there?

Someone who is "foreign" is not the same as "someone from a different race." North Koreans are racially the same as South Koreans, but nonetheless, South Koreans would still be treated as foreigners and would be placed in this foreigner's only section.

Like I said, it's a national thing, not a race thing.

You can't bomb a country's soil to the point where the toxic gunpowder doesn't let crops grow, then stop that country's from taking loans from the World Bank, keep them from maintaining normal trade, sanction them, etc. and watch them starve, then say it's all their fault. This "aid" were under the table reparations for the criminal inhumanity the US committed during the Korean War.

Juche has to be understood in the context of the post Korean War and the Sino-Soviet Split. The country wanted to step back from Cold War era politics and give the world a distinct way of understanding socialism and communism, apart from the ideological monopoly the Soviets and the Chinese had created.

Christopher Hitchens was one of the poorest excuses of what passes off as a "public intellectual." Every debate, he came out with some emotional, moralistic rambling, while in the same breath, rejecting God and most ideologies and political philosophies. He was better at telling you what he was against than telling you what he actually supported.

His "leftist" credentials are as some hacky ex-Trotskyist journalist who was good at telling off the Far Right. Afterward, he became a straight up neo-con, in support for the Iraq War and in getting involved in North Korea. I wouldn't take his word for it. Anything he says is likely propaganda. I used to have respect for him, but I'm too old to still think Hitchens was this great intellectual. He was a neoliberal with a cool british accent that is only intelligent to what are now known as normies. Redditers, Democratic Party teens, and Antifa.

>You can't bomb a country's soil to the point where the toxic gunpowder doesn't let crops grow, then stop that country's from taking loans from the World Bank, keep them from maintaining normal trade, sanction them, etc. and watch them starve, then say it's all their fault. This "aid" were under the table reparations for the criminal inhumanity the US committed during the Korean War.

Why do communists often exhibit this martyred attitude? You guys are such inveterate whingers.

Which part of this is you refuting my statement that first world nations should be fucking embarrassed and shamed for allowing DPRK to continue to exist.

I reaaaaally don't want to hear any western apologists for the North Korea regime. Examine your position, reconcile that with the walking skeletons in the north, then sort yourself out. Thanks.

Hi there, me again. Thinking about it for a few more seconds: fuck you and the keyboard you rode in on. You sanctimonious mental deficient. Juche should not be "understood." It is simply a program designed to let a dynasty hold onto power while paying lip service to communist ideals. (Ideals which I happen to disagree with: the state's seizure of the means of production is ALWAYS a bad idea.) DPRK is the 21st century equivalent of a medieval tyranny. It's an autocracy backed by a starving army. The children of Kim Il-sung should have been murdered in their sleep. I worked in the military intelligence field for years with North Korea as my target. I am all for critical theory and considering the Other. North Korea is THE fucking disgrace of humanity. Go fuck yourself. Seriously.

Just saying it again. Go fuck yourself and die in a pool of your own shit for defending the DPRK regime. You have no idea how offensive you are.

He's either trolling or is a tankie who rationalizes everything NK does as being justified as preemptive measures against the US.

Mostly just justification after-the-fact of moves made out of necessity, isolation, and often the varied inclinations of whichever Kim was in charge. There's very much nothing of substance to be found there.

>tankie who rationalizes everything NK does as being justified as preemptive measures against the US.

Not sure what a tankie is, but I'm sure this is correct. My point is he's a fucking slob of a thinker and should correct himself with a fucking quickness. His defense of massive human suffering under a legit Orwellian dystopia is abhorrent. He is beyond ridicule.

Tankies are the lefty version of stormfags complete with the "X gorillion is fake and Nk did nothing wrong, you just misunderstand the intentions."
youtube.com/watch?v=IQytIoPhlA0

The term "Tankie" is a term for incredibly stubborn Stalinists/M-Ls.

It refers to how hardliners support how the USSR "sent in the tanks" to crush the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, which split the left anew at the time.

>low crime rates
nk is the most corupt country in the world acording to the un

I bloody hate "tankies".
When Paris attack happened in november 2015, I was 100 meters from a bar where many people got killed.
I saw plenty of people running down the street advising us to hide because a shooting was happening. I went into the court of a building, where I met a bunch of 20 something students at La Sorbonne in Paris, from Quebec.
At this point we knew that plenty of people had been killed, and that a hostage crisis was happening at Le Bataclan.
These fuckers just said "France got what it deserves, they deserve it, like the post colonial exploitive republic that they are".
It is just the perfect endoctrinement. Validating innocent deaths.
I fucking hate the Sorbonne University, and bloody fucking Sartre. I dispise any student that subscribe to any of the commie bullshit. Go get a brain.

Owned

There were many Nazi's who desired a cooperative relationship with the Soviet Union against the west before the purge

THat is too kind a desciptor, they are wilful idiots of Stalinism (they hate this word) who genuinely swallow the cult of personality. Even the wholesale genocide of Chechens after WW2 is rationalised as virtious liberatory violence against the boogyman fascist