>there are people on Veeky Forums who unironically believe in abiogenesis
Why are people stupid enough to believe this bullshit?
>never been observed
>never been reproduced
>no one knows how it could have happned
It's literally a different type of religion.
Other urls found in this thread:
Well OP what do you unironically believe?
At difference of the religion
If proved wrong i could change my faith
Simple logic. There was a point when there was no life. Later, there was a point when there was. Therefore life must have come from non-living precursors.
There is nothing of logic in what you have said
There is a lot of pressuposition in what you have said
There is nothing of logic in what you have said
There is a lot of pressuposition in what you have said
>pressuposition
Explain
>he probably actually does know about the amino acid experiments and probably has some "cracker-jack" retort for them
From what you say there was i time without life?
Even if proved is still based onfaith!!!
Even if it work 1 bilion of bilion of time
Is still faith
The surface of the earth was entirely molten during the early portion of the Hadean eon - therefore no life.
Liquid water forms around 100 million years later and our earliest evidence of life is 100 million years after that (traces of carbon in zircons from an australian craton).
Still a better kind of faith than the religious one
>there are people on Veeky Forums who unironically believe that planets can form
Why are people stupid enough to believe this bullshit?
>never been observed
>never been reproduced
>no one knows how it could have happened
It's literally a different type of religion.
You see logic can go anywhere whitout pressuposition
So is not simply logic!!
At difference of the religion
If proved wrong i could change my faith
I don't understand...what exactly are you saying then? that life was created by another living thing?
well then how was that thing created?
are you trying to make an argument for a theology in a creator, because if you are it's very unclear and still doesn't rule out abiogenesis
i.e.
>let creator exist
>"hmmpf how to make ppl??"
>take inorganic molecules and put them into certain conditions (abiogenesis)
>life wow
>worship me faggots
What the fuck are you wittering about?
It HAS been observed though
>tfw made artificial piss in a lab
Is not simply logic what you have said there things outside of it
That you talk about and you can't arrive to it just with logic
I just think that if it was created
Who done this could have done a better work
Insert the newest pasta here.
I think Miller-Urey gives us a reason to consider abiogenesis. We got anything else to go on?