It's time to find out how special this board is

It's time to find out how special this board is.
My score is 35 because I can never give up on FTL

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe#Controversies
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_utilities_problem
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

How the hell is the heat death of the universe autistic?

10, the universe is definitely simulated.

that's not bingo you pleb

...

>thermodynamics is bullshit
>superdeterminism is right
>epr=er is wrong

did a 12 year old make this?

>How the hell is the heat death of the universe autistic?
It's a purely faith based notion, basically apocalypse for physicists

30
Free will, heat death. and wormholes.
General Relativity assures without reasonable cause the rest of that list isn't possible.

I wasted 5 min on this for you user.

Why is free will there?
That question sits squarely in the realm of philosophy, not science.

>the most likely consequence of the most widely accepted theories is purely faith based
Now this is autism.

asking the scientific plausibility of any question relating to free will is autistic itself.

Do you even understand that theory?

>no idea what heat death is
How the hell do you know anything else but not that?

>we can't disprove that multiple universes don't exist
>heat death is a possibility, but we won't know until it happens, if we survive that long
>ftl communication is possible in theory using quantum entanglement
>blackholes are wormholes
>we can't determine if free will exists or not because we don't know if the universe is deterministic or not
>tachyons
>many-worlds interpretation hasn't been disproven or proven yet
>yeah you got me, em drive is bullshit
>we can't travel against the flow of time, but if time was bent into a loop via a wormhole or some other bullshit then the past could be approached from the past
>quantum indeterminacy exists for a reason, if you can prove it's determinate, go ahead
>we can't prove or disprove that it's simulated
>while holes don't exists in our part of the observe universe

Whoever made this infograph has autism, regardless of what they got.

>Multiple Universes Exist
You'd have to fundamentally change the definition of "universe" to make this possible.
>Wormholes are real
Doubt it but the math doesn't not-work.
>Quantum Parallel Dimensions
Seems like a silly cop-out to the issue of Quantum Randomness
>Quantum Randomness is Real
"It doesn't make sense to me therefore it's autistic." +10
>Heat Death Will Happen
You have to be actually retarded to think otherwise. +5
>Free Will Exists
You're changing what "free will" means so that you can make obvious stuff sound edgy. Determinism is real, but so is the ability to act and have effects because of it.
>Em Drive
Why is this only a +5? Should be a +80.
>Universe is simulated
That sentence doesn't mean anything. If it's a simulation, it's not the universe.
>FTL communication is possible
No reason why it couldn't be.
>FTL travel is possible.
If FTL communication is possible, so is travel. Why are these separate?
>We can travel back in time
Electrons do it all the time. +15
>White Holes Exist
Doubt it but the math doesn't not-work.

I got a 35.

wow the image is really good at detecting this kind of person

>heat death
>>the most likely consequence of the most widely accepted theories
[citation needed]

Well then how will the universe end?

what type of person?

kys OP

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe#Controversies

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics

>en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermodynamics

Read a book for once in your life pleb.

I don't see what you're getting at.

I asked for a citation that heat death is the most likely consequence of the most widely accepted theories.

All you've shown is that the word entropy appears on the Wikipedia page for thermodynamics (anyone can edit that).

In all fairness, anyone can edit it to show that heat death is part of the page. But you do realize that the eventual heat death of the universe will be caused by entropy reaching zero universally.

There is always this.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat_death_of_the_universe

pic related.

>But you do realize that the eventual heat death of the universe will be caused by entropy reaching zero universally.
I asked for a citation that heat death is the most likely consequence of the most widely accepted theories.

congrats, youve got the anally aggregated autism

In the list of references attached to you will find the math that proves both entropy and heat death. If you feel like some light reading have a go wrapping your head around those.

pretty sure quantum entanglement means FTL communication has already been achieved

and how is EM drive only +5? It's literally been debunked and is now an /x/ tier conspiracy worth at least 100

>you will find the math that proves both entropy and heat death.
I asked for a citation that heat death is the most likely consequence of the most widely accepted theories.

I look at memes

>mfw can think in more than 2-dimensions

>pretty sure quantum entanglement means FTL communication has already been achieved
No, that's only interpretation.

>muh citations
are you not capable of thinking through this concept by yourself? What is so hard to grasp about heat death?

>the math that proves both entropy and heat death
No it doesn't.

>What is so hard to grasp about heat death?
Why it's the most likely consequence of the most widely accepted theories.

pffft you're like a little baby

...

Heat death is 100% guaranteed to happen, the question is whether it is permanent or if it is temporary.

>>Heat Death Will Happen
>You have to be actually retarded to think otherwise. +5
d-delet this

>can barely predict whether it will rain tomorrow or not
>"Heat death is 100% guaranteed to happen"

Go back to IFLS

Wait, what's wrong with wormholes?

I thought we assumed they existed.

>I thought we assumed they existed.
Speak for yourself.

When I was a kid, I was taught that Black Holes were only hypothetical and might not exist. Today, it's currently widely accepted that Black Holes definitely exist.
Similarly, I was taught the same about Wormholes as a kid. As I've grown up, I've been hearing a lot more about wormholes.

I guess I assumed I've been hearing more about wormholes because we had found evidence in support of their existence. Like what happened with Black Holes.

>can't even predict whether a flipped coin will be heads or tails
>jumping into a volcano is 100% guaranteed to kill you
fucking brainlets

I scored 60 just like my Calc I average.

There's literally zero evidence for wormholes.
It's just a case of "Well, the math technically allows for it... "

I got scored 5 points.

well that's a bummer

Heat death meme deserves a higher autism point.

>white hole
you mean white spike

It is accepted that entropy increases for the universe. This is irrefutable. This leads to heat death. QED

Yes it does.

>It is accepted that entropy increases for the universe. This is irrefutable.
Completely and utterly wrong

Be more informative, ya fucko

Nope

Literally just applied statistics. There's nothing else to the heat death.

>It is accepted that entropy increases for the universe.
No it's not.

The opposite you silly brainlet, have you never heard of dark energy?

Worst autism bingo I've ever seen. Fuck you OP

t. low functioning autist

What did I originally win?

GODDAMMIT! Heat death was in a fucking anime, how the fuck do you not know about it

why is meme-drive only +5? It should be a 15. Why do FTL communication, FTL travel, and time travel not have the same score?

0 points

Serious question, i have never study graph theory, can someone show the proof that explain what this shit is impossible without klein bottles or others tricks ?

The heat death might happen on a 'practical' or human perspective.
Reaching total thermodynamic equilibrium, however, is probably absurd to expect on a finite time.
I might have a misconception about it, but it seems to be that entropy increases in a 'decelerating' way, with it's maximum value at an 'infinite' (undefined) time.

It only increases given good enough conditions. Check your assumptions.

45
Multiple universes - why not?
Free will - yes, but be careful with definition
MWI - it's the best explanation we have, so yes

20 feels good to not be crazy

>multiple universes
ur dumb
>free will
what is the definition?
>WMI
whats that?

Several of these are acceptable hypotheses.

>ur dumb
ur dumber
>what is the definition?
will free from external factors, but be careful with determining what is external factor and what isn't
>whats that?
parallel quantum dimensions

>ur dumber
ur dumbest
>free will
define free will within scientific terms
>parallel quantum dimensions
watching michio kaku and thinking you actually understand science again? you're going for the the golden autism award I see.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_utilities_problem
Basically prove that the complete bipartite graph [math]K_{3,3}[/math] (2 sets of 3 vertices, each vertex of each set is connected to all vertices of the other set) is planar
It's not that easy and I don't know the proof, but wikipedia has one

The universe is a closed system you dipshit.

>false equivalences
>thinks he's smart and creative

Got 30 because of multiple universes and free will. I refuse to stop believing in them.

>can barely predict whether it will rain tomorrow or not
That doesn't change the fact that we are confident it will not rain on earth ~4 billion years from now thanks to the sun. Or that we are confident it will not rain anywhere in the universe several trillion years from now thanks to entropy

The point is that we are trying to make a conclusion on something we don't really understand that is billions of years old, and extremely complex using physics that is only a couple of centuries old.

>with it's maximum value at an 'infinite' (undefined) time.
Don't know where you got this idea from but it's completely wrong.
At infinite time all value of entropy are equally likely.

>quantum entanglement implies ftl communication

The Chinese were able to teleport a photon 300 miles. If you can do that you can do ftl communication.

...

dS > 0

>the chinese
lul

Dark energy is the thing pushing apart the universe you stupid fuck.

>ur dumbest
If you're dumber, I'm not the dumbest.
>define free will within scientific terms
DIY
>thinking you actually understand science again?
Better than you.

So what?

60

>Universes
>Dimensions
>Wormholes
>FTL Travel AND Communication

I don't believe any of these are true.

>FTL communication with quantum entanglement
Try again

>believing in the heat death meme
imagine being this autistic

>entropy is a religion
What did he mean by this?

>>false equivalences
>>thinks he's smart and creative
>can barely predict whether it will rain tomorrow or not
>>"Heat death is 100% guaranteed to happen"

"Bingo"

Also entropy is real, are you retarded?

>>>false equivalences
>>>thinks he's smart and creative

>>can barely predict whether it will rain tomorrow or not
>>>"Heat death is 100% guaranteed to happen"

>EM drive is possible
>only +5
Nigger, this should be like +1000

The only two of these that are even reasonable are FTL communication and travel, but humans are unlikely to ever stop being utter mongs long enough to do either.