Fact: no well read man is a racist

If you read a thousand children picture books, are you well read? No, it means you have read trash books. Literally every intellectual who is even marginally well read knows racism is nonsense and it's just a form of controlling the masses.

As a SJW, this is not true. I wish it was, but it simply isn't, especially when you look outside of the 21st century.
The smartest guys in history have been mostly unapologeticly racist and sexist.
This kind of acceptance as the Western status quo is extremely recent.

did i say picture books? i guess that's the problem with people who use arguments such as these, willing to twist meaning however they please.

there are racist intellectuals, son, despite how you may idolize them, there are still racists in their midst. you know, there are even racially motivated intellectuals who hide their true opinion to serve their nefarious purposes! can you believe it?

perhaps you should read more, it may help you to understand people.

Fuck off Steven.

You have zero reading comprehension, you haven't read a dozen books let alone ten thousand. Get a grip dude.

i don't like non whites because i don't like their skin colour
non-white is icky

yes, that's the crux of my argument, that i have read thousands of books and i am still tyrannical mega racist.

no, nitwit, i am telling you that ideology can exist side by side with education. people can be worldly and racist.

you're probably going to reply with something stupid.

It's largely cultural but there are obvious differences either way. Physical differences everyone can see. Would mental differences etc really be that hard to even imagine?

For the record I grew up in a pretty shitty area like I described, I hung out with 2nd-generation immigrants who had it better than myself and the other whites I knew in the area, yet they were overwhelmingly criminal with little impulse control. They were (and still are) violent, cruel and with a pack mentality, yet play the victim in any situation where an authority figure gets involved.

Obviously I can't give you life experiences, but I suggest reading into adoption studies and such.

This, really. It is a recent thing. Whether it'll last or not I can't say but it doesn't really matter how many books you've read.

Racism is not an ideology, it's a phase that readers go through and non-readers are stuck in forever

>i have read thousands of books and i am still tyrannical mega racist
quantity =/= quality
also no you haven't

>left-wing """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""intellectuals"""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

>all intellectuals are worthless because internet celebrities and losers on /pol/ told me so

Yes, I guess all the smartest guys that there have been were all hacks. Thanks for this truth, user.

Can't I just dislike people without these labels? I don't non-whites, I don't like fat people, I don't like manlets, I don't like myself.

Gas the Kikes, race war now?

Sorry friend but nobody mentioned intellectuals. Just """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""intellectuals""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" and you are the only """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""intellectual""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" here.

Read a fucking book.

I am well read and very racest

You changed my mind, cholo.
Thanks :)))))))

>tfw this is what happens when you're getting educated by stormfags raiding /pol/

>what is sarcasm
>racism isn't an ideology

well, i knew the response to my post would consist of stupidity, but you certainly have outdone yourselves. racism is most certainly an ideology, or i suppose hitler wasn't operating on some sort of ideological basis? how silly of me to expect you to understand sarcasm, you monglet, i am not claiming to have read ten thousand books, you idiot, i was using this as an example. i suppose you hear "i've read thousands of books more than you ever have or ever will" amd you assume immediately that it's a dickwaving contest.

i'm sure more idiotic responses will be made to this. you stumpfucks have a fantastic day.

Would you believe I've read more than one? I haven't read as many buzzfeed articles as you, though, so I guess you're still more """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""intellectual""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" than me.

Tell me. What did you read which enlightened you on racism? What knowledge on the matter do you have over the people who have experiences with it first hand?

It has nothing to do with intellect. Its just hate,and the more intelligent the more you can justify it

Today I fantasized with insulting Sam Harris in public and ruining his reputation

>Racism is not an ideology, it's a phase that readers go through and non-readers are stuck in forever
You're mistaken, I'm not trying to educate you. I don't know where I would even start.

OP is a faggot

I grew up on an estate where the two rival groups funnelling into organised crime were anglos and greeks. asians etc. seemed to be just street level runners. what makes your experience more valid than mine?

Hitler's ideology was national socialism. Rednecks who cry about blacks do not have an ideology. God, you are embarrassing.

Hitler's ideology was babby first political manifesto. Don't give dignity to it, it's a philosophically worthless work.

you sure showed me, stumpfuck idiot!
ideologies don't exist for poor whites because you say so. how racist. perhaps you should read more.

What the fuck delete this post. Natsoc ideology was barely below Marxism in terms of significance. Hitler's take on it was looney, maybe, but the ideology itself was just as sound. Are you going to tell me Das Kapital was a philosophically worthless work?

sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/04/170411130810.htm

>Naiqi G. Xiao, Rachel Wu, Paul C. Quinn, Shaoying Liu, Kristen S. Tummeltshammer, Natasha Z. Kirkham, Liezhong Ge, Olivier Pascalis, Kang Lee. Infants Rely More on Gaze Cues From Own-Race Than Other-Race Adults for Learning Under Uncertainty. Child Development, 2017; DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12798
>Naiqi G. Xiao, Paul C. Quinn, Shaoying Liu, Liezhong Ge, Olivier Pascalis, Kang Lee. Older but not younger infants associate own-race faces with happy music and other-race faces with sad music. Developmental Science, 2017; DOI: 10.1111/desc.12537

Racism is natural.

Assuming you're OP, you're the one trying to invalidate mine.

im not op.

Racism is not an ideology, saying no well read man is racist is as stupid as saying no well read man dislikes women.

Fact: no well-read man is sexist.

speaking of

It's entirely possible for one to be well-read in subjects not related to race. If such person has only been exposed to poor uneducated arabs, the only two rational conclusions would be that arabs are an inferior race or that there is not enough information to make a decision.

The latter conclusion is more likely to be correct, but when you have a thousand years of history books portraying that race as animals, then it's hard to argue that it's true.

Who is this Destiny guy?

Well, if your experience gives you another view of racism etc then that's fine with me. Either way it's not about to how many books we've read.

A nobody who is so clever at marketing himself that he booked arguments with a bunch of HOT e-celebrities.

>caring about e-celebrity drama

Literally the reality tv watchers of Veeky Forums.

no but neither is experience a reasonable justification for extrapolation.

no one ever said that racism is an ideology except those who created the strawman argument itself.
it's a part of an ideology. what is an ideology? a system of ideas and ideals, especially one that forms the basis of economic or political theory and policy.

what is racism? an idea or belief. i would doubt anyone could argue with the statement that racism is an idea. or that ideologies are comprised of ideas. i'm sure someone will try to argue against that anyway. i don't care anymore, you can't beat ideology out of someone by telling them to read. it's idiotic tomassume that education is the true requirement to some sort of utopian world where racism no longer exists.

That's arguable. I never advocated for throwing all africans in a pit for possessing certain traits but I do for example avoid gangs which appear to be of middle-eastern origins because I know they're more likely to cause trouble for me etc.

This is supposedly racist, and that's fine.

Every man with world experience is a racist

you should read more.

No well read man allows their personal biases to get in the way of objective reasoning.

Yeah, maybe if you are low class trash that lives near thugs and criminals you are a racist, but people with REAL world experience (well read and educated folks) understand that racism is unfounded and is easily explained away by income and education levels as well as the state of the home.

Again, what would I read in this case?

Medical journals and history texts.

Define racism first.

If by racism you mean a general distrust/hatred towards foreigners than that's not an idea. It's just hostility directed at a particular group of people for any kind of reason.

i was just being a prick. nothing you read is going to make you stop avoiding rambling gangs of brownies looking for trouble, at least i hope not since that would endanger you. if reading more makes you less racist, then reading more lessens your survivability. people like OP, therefore, wish you to die for their ideological and moral convenience.

>living in high minority population areas to witness their cultures is less real than reading books

Wew.

You're right. All white men are dumb.

I could likewise tell you to read adoption studies and studies related to crime (with regards to poverty and all that). Any of which shows definite pointers to differences between different ethnicities.

Could you link me a medical journal or history text which would make me throw all of that out the window?

I read an article which claimed racism was "attractive proposition for lazy minds", due to the fact that racists can't comprehend the complexity of the world due to their low intelligence, so they divide humankind into identifiable groups and assign their prejudices on them.

Reading does not lessen your survivability, the stress you put on yourself from raging at imaginary racial defects will take years off your life.

If you read history books you would understand the reason why so many cultures have different problems, as opposed to just labelling them naturally inferior like a lazy prole.

so I should advocate that people avoid white people because I know they're more likely to control drugs or rob your flat. this extrapolation should be fine.

i can't fucking believe i have to tell someone on a forum that concerns itself with READING FUCKING BOOKS what an IDEA is.

the definition of idea: a thought or suggestion as to a possible course of action.

i really don't even want to get into this, you who thinks that hatred or distrust aren't fucking thoughts. that there's supposedly a whole new way people can think without thoughts or ideas really suggests to me that you genuienly have no other reason to argue in this, than to quibble down to the last bit of straw you resurrected from the dead scarecrow corpse you beat worse than the dead horse you rode here on.

racism is an idea. it is the idea that one race is inferior to another. that's fucking it.

If you read my post you'd know that I'm not talking about culture. Specifically the adoption studies show that a child completely removed from the culture of their biological parents still show many of the same traits.

If you've read convincing material on the matter and some white people are scouting out your place for example, then yeah act appropriately.

Where I'm at it's mostly slavic criminals who do burglaries. International leagues who move stuff over the border with ease.

It would be ridiculous to deny biological variances in traits amongst various races. However, we simply do not know the extent to which these determine psychological categories like intelligence, openness, uncertainty avoidance, violence, etc. IQ is a good example, the highest scores correlate strongly with successful future endeavors, but there is strong literature on it being a mere measurement on short term working memory. The nature vs. nurture debate is simply not over.

Which is why reading will reveal the complexity of the issue and instil a more nuanced attitude towards racism, regardless of your experiential proclivity towards it.

Post your study that you think "proves" racism and I will post a dozen that debunk it.

For example this, with a video if you don't have much time.

jstor.org/stable/40063231?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
youtube.com/watch?v=F0_NsS1Zdlk

"some" nice back-peddle. so you agree, experience is not a reasonable justification for extrapolation.

>peddle

What? It is. Where did I claim it did not?

>far-right "literature"

>grow up in a poor town with more blacks and mexicans than whites
>don't become a racist and all of my friends were non-whites
maybe you just suck

How tall are you Steven? 5'4?

It's not about whether or not you become friends with them. It's about whether or not you notice the differences between you.

You can be "racist" and still have plenty of friends of other ethnicities.

Anti-racism is a type of racism.

What I noticed was that they were humans who had grown up in different cultures. The idea ethnicity or race has a biological, inherent affect on your intellect or personality is dismissed by every credible scientist and has been for decades.

so what you're saying is noticing biological, behavioural and preformative differences between human beings is strong enough of a criterion to be considered racist?

are you unironically retarded phamalamadingdong?

autistic men are prone to leftism

all well read men with the courage to say what they believe will tell you that niggers are typically intellectually deficient, violent, and even subhuman/

What is and what isn't credible is a discussion in and of itself, but there are physical differences between different ethnicities, everyone knows this. It's obvious and apparent.

The idea that there may be differences mentally is really so alien? Not even marginal differences?

This is what I've been called racist for in the past, and it's what I've seen others have been condemned for as well.

Nice virtue signaling tho

You might be too quick to explain away all those differences through biology.

Regardless of that, your retort is embracing the term and accepting their definition?

The organization.

If you claim to not be racist it is because you are still a child who has not lived long enough. Man was born to hate and shall do so until he dies. We are born with racial preference, it's hard coded. Nothing you think will ever change this, take your fake education and drown.

>how can i signal my virtue?

nigger

I don't define it, people do. And people have used it against me and against others for acknowledging genetic differences between ethnicities.

I have no interest in controlling words or how people speak, since I have no interest in controlling anyone.

I am racist because I reject slave morality. I believe the strong should not have to kneel before the Weak. Is this how it ends, White Man? Will you go out prostrated in apology before your shrieking pathetic inferiors or will you fight?

But a lot of classical literature is written by white men who thought blacks were subhuman and jews were parasites
It's only been like 60 or so years since racism fell out of favor. Do you only read books written very recently and only by the right type of author?

>imaginary racial defects
Wut?

Depends on what you mean by 'racist'. I am well-read, and I am a race realist in that I think it's likely that different races do have different levels of average intelligence. However, I am not an alt-rightist, a white supremacist, or a fascist... I don't think that racial issues have any place in politics. And I insist on judging an individual by his or her own ability, not by the average ability of his or her ethnic group.

I think the reason "racism" is on the rise is because while there is a nuance to the differences between races, government policy doesn't take that into consideration. The agenda is "need more brown people, white people evil". So of course, whites want to be separated.
Regardless of any rationalization, proximity+diversity=conflict. There's not really much to be done about it. It's more logical just to create policies that align with human nature instead of opposing it for the sake of social engineering.

Woah so diverse and tolerant! I bet you let those Pee-Oh-Cees fuck your wife as well, must be fun being crippled by guilt and hating your own race!

The only reason race became political is because under our current system, race relations are dictated by government policy.
There are laws in place that specifically are designed to diminish white demographics and uplift non-white demographics.
Not to mention it is a government policy that is bringing in non-whites in the first place, in massive numbers.

Not all though. In the US for example, african americans are given a whole lot of benefits while asian americans have to make it on their own.