Should his books be placed in the fiction section?
Should his books be placed in the fiction section?
yes.
Should all books be placed in the fiction section?
no.
its already found in the useless section, so why bother changing. Potaytoe patatoh
Marx is important whether you agree with him or not.
That's the worst thing about him.
What are you implying?
That Marx was important and continues to be despite his erroneous thought.
Why would Marx be in the fiction section? He was an okay economist who had a very firm grasp on free market economic thinking from the XIX century. Hell, a lot of stuff he says is straight outta Ricardo.
no because they have no narrative, dumbo
would be EXCELLENT banter
better the fantasy/sci-fi section
Because science fiction predicts the future?
>Marx
>economist
Good one
no because its often overly verbose and lacking in substance
>pink pretzels
Sounds yummy. What's your deal, user?
Why not?
Even nonfiction is not the absolute truth
Marx was right about only one thing, Capitalism is thievery and fueled by greed and wrath. Capitalism is cancer but communism isn't the answer either.
Jews are cancer.
every book is in the fiction section
you're so close
Explain. I'm not the anti-Semite who you responded to, but I'm curious what your answer is.
Subjectivists must hang
^inarguable fact btw^
No. I recommend you read Searle's "The logical status of fictional discourse" to understand the necessary conditions for a work to be classified as "fiction", as you seem to have some trouble with that notion.
Yeah, no. Searle has been outed as a pervert and has thus been discredited.
No. No matter what you think of his work vs. the work of Ayn Rand, he wrote philosophy (non-fiction) and she wrote allegorical novels (fiction).
>haha lets put religious works in the fiction section
did I time travel back to 2008 again
No, It should be placed in the legendary section.
who's that? God? then yes
Put me in screen shot, you ERIC memer
bump