Proof: see axiom list.

# Proof

All urls found in this thread:

**mega.nz**

**youtube.com**

Author makes a statement but doesn't prove it. Writes "(why?)" afterwards to make the reader question it and hopefully prove it.

the purpose is to present concept numerically, algebraically, in words and graphically

but we can't interpret it geometrically because the graph of f lies in four-dimensional space

How the fuck can mathematicians defend this? Might as well call modern mathematics a religious cult.

proof: talk to your professor!

Some bullshit "Math and Socializing" class where we were supposed to talk to people. Apparently my school thinks the math majors are complete social autists.

Hates a math class for making him socially interact

"Apparently my school thinks the math majors are complete social autists."

Hmmm, I wonder why?

Lol yeah right. Bullies in school are the CEOs today. B/c they are sociopaths.

If you keep talking back to me I'm going to hold you down and make you suck my dick. You'd like that wouldn't you, you little fag?

Nerds do. But seriously, some classes understanding the proofs is crucial to success of the class.

I've always just memorized the formulas

Why bother? If you're not going to bother understanding the material you may as well just look the formulas up online.

how else are you going to learn how to prove theorem yourself? or don't your exams include constructing proofs?