Science itself is a pseudoscience. Prove me wrong.
Science itself is a pseudoscience. Prove me wrong
Andrew Adams
Benjamin Fisher
...
Aaron Clark
Define "science"
Define "pseudoscience"
Isaac Baker
Define "define"
Ryan Brooks
>mfw he gets on sci and sees how much the community hates him for the endless "pseudoscience" posting
Mason Green
Well then. Is it so hard to see. Science is just an art. If you can land on the moon with it, then it is real, it's a factum. If it dosen't it's not. It should be easy to see that. Hope i didn't blow your mind right now. Prove that wrong and im gonna stop doing drugs.
Camden White
t. read 10 pages of Popper and views itself as enlightened
Sebastian Hughes
>iq lovers
>race lovers
Good to know you still can't prove it.
Jace Long
Science: following the scientific method of critically testing your hypotheses to develop your theories
Pseudoscience: going through the motions without the proper rigor.
Proved you wrong faggot
Gavin Campbell
No such thing as "the scientific method".
Evan Brooks
Colton Howard
user... do you need help? I get that elementary education isn't that great, but you still should have learned what the scientific method is...
Carson Anderson
I guess then Veeky Forums - Science and Math should be renamed to /psi/ - Pseudoscience and Mathjokes
Dylan Long
Sorry. You don't understand that I believe that phenotype inplies genotype and therefore science is a pseudoscience.
See above.
Julian Stewart
>scientific method
>last stage is getting a group of kikes to agree that your research is valid
Joseph Phillips
>thinking we landed on the moon
Julian Campbell
>scientists think that it was them who got men to the moon and not engineers
Xavier Ramirez
>engineers weren't told how to take the already calculated interplanetary environment into account, they just figured that out on their own
Joseph Thompson
Rekt
Luis Hall
There's no such thing as a single method that leads to the obtainment of knowledge about reality. Actual, relevant discoveries in science (think something that radically changes our understanding of reality, not the shit done by PhDs with fund money) are rarely made by following your stale "methods", but usually quite the contrary: by going against the dominant views.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Of course, given your evident and utter ignorance understanding of philosophy of science and your belief that what you're taught in elementary school is all there is to it (!!!), I don't believe either of you would've thought of this.
Aaron Brown
See
John Murphy
Define "lover", define "IQ," define "race." Checkmate. Also, phenotype implies genotype, so race isn't science. It's pseudoscience.
Carson Stewart
See
Jacob Walker
>You don't understand that I believe that .........
Believing belongs on
Zachary Flores
>all these posts wanking over definitions when can be directly refuted by the law of non-contradiction
Is applying basic logic really that hard?
Evan Hughes
What? In that we can't affirm facts on a quantum level because it would require a perceptable device recording constantly and be of high sensibility?
Leo Cook
I need to cum...RIGHT NOW
Jaxon Gutierrez
Engineers and scientists are literal shit eating brainlets when compared to mathematicians and philosophers.
"science" isn't a "pseudoscience" but scientists are pseudo-intellectuals.