>the Moon orbits the Earth thanks to the centrifugal and centripetal forces being in equilibrium
The Moon orbits the Earth thanks to the centrifugal and centripetal forces being in equilibrium
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtu.be
m.imgur.com
m.imgur.com
youtu.be
usdebtclock.org
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
metabunk.org
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtu.be
lmgtfy.com
youtu.be
youtu.be
pbs.twimg.com
youtu.be
media.gettyimages.com
upload.wikimedia.org
epa.gov
youtu.be
youtu.be
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
>sun is 93million miles way and orbing the galaxy at half a million mph
What is wrong about that statement?
Besides the retarded units, of course.
To measure the distance of the distance of the sun you'd have to turn it off, then on again, and time how long it'd take for the light to get here, but this also assumes light actually has a speed.
If it's orbiting the galaxy at 500,000+ then the movements of the stars would not be as stable as they are. Parallax cannot explain it because of all of the other supposed movements that the earth is making too.
distance to the sun is measured by bouncing radar off of Venus
I hope you are baiting. Otherwise you are profoundly retarded.
You have no sense of dimensions. On the galactic scale, 500000mph is a slow speed. The angular velocity relative to the center of the galaxy is of less than 2x10^-6 degrees per year.
It takes the Sun more than 200 million years to complete one orbit around the Galaxy.
Do you understand that? Of course you don't.
>distance to sun is measured by measuring something that isn't the distance to the sun
>It takes the Sun more than 200 million years to complete one orbit around the Galaxy.
That's some cool sci-fi. How about some evidence.
What constitutes evidence for a tard like you?
Observable, measurable and repeatable scientific evidence.
You can check basic Newtonian physics doing experiments in your room.
You can then make sense of those facts that you don't believe. You will realise the math fit them.
If you haven't bothered to do so, it is your problem. Keep believing the Moon is made of cheese.
>the math fit them
Believing math = science
I'm not too sure about he details but they figured out that Venus is 0.3 AU
I'm sure they just take the radar distance at two different times when Venus is closest to Earth then just do some calculations based on the heliocentric model
It's basic astrophysics
>bouncing radar off Venus
Enough with the sci-fi already.
What makes you think we can't do that?
I dont know about equalibrium. Moon is getting farther from earth, I think its 3cm a year. At some point in future it will leave eaths orbit
Who will illuminates the nights of our descendants?
Because it's fucking ridiculous.
>i can't understand it, thus it is ridiculous
Go bounce some waves off of Venus then radar boy. I refuse to entertain such a fantasy world.
Maybe Metabunk.org can prove the Sun and Moon are far away like they proved the Earth isnt flat
I rarely lurk Veeky Forums. Can some oldfags explain me if people here actualy are retarded or just pretending with this flat-earth and flath-earth related theories? Is this like local meme?
>gravity is like a billiard ball on a bedsheet
It began as a meme but then it attracted actual retards.
Nice trips!
The Earth is flat
Go measure it
I already had flight around the world. Twice. :^)
Only stubborn sci-fi retards still think they're on a spinning ball hurtling through space. It's the dumbest shit ever.
80% chances you are trolling, 15% you are from USA, 5% from other country.
100% chance you're a stubborn sci-fi nerd (and brainlet)
That's about right.
Tidal forces are stealing angular momentum from the Earth's spin and pushing the Moon outwards. But it won't continue indefinitely. Someday the Earth will become tide-locked as the Moon is today. Each will permanently face the other as Pluto and Charon do.
Then the Solar tide (which is weaker than the Lunar one) will steal angular momentum from the Earth-Moon system and the Moon will begin creeping closer again. This will take a very long time. I forget if the Moon will reach the Roche Limit and break up before the Sun expands and engulfs us both.
Good thing we have the scientific method and mathematics
All we have to do is measure the Earth s curvature
We could apply aerial photography to this chart and find out if the Earth is as round as we ve been told.
What s the name of the scientific experiment that demonstrates and proves that a body of water, such as the oceans, can hold a convex shape?
>I have no idea what I'm actually talking about. I'm just regurgitating some shit other people who don't know what they're talking about said
After tidal locking, tidal forces will cancel, keeping the moon at the same distance from Earth. The expansion of the sun will likely occur before Earth/moon tidal locking. The moon will never hit the Roche limit.
So that's why we have even better engines, spacecrafts and other pieces needed to go back to a moon. So it's not related to pic related? Huh.
>all that money wasted on the ((($pace $huttle)))
It hurts
...
I agree that STS program was a waste and bad idea in a first place but whole point is that funding less than fucking 0.5% of USA budget. If you compare it to even with 90's budget you will see that only thing that NASA needs is actual funding of at least 1%. Funny thing is that random Americans asked on a street said things like it's 20% right now.
>Percent of total budget
50+ million a day
I wonder if that s enough for NASA to make a educational video of them measuring the size and distance of the Sun and Moon?
>19 billion a year isn't enough to go to the moon
>What is inflation.
Why retarded flat earth supporters can only spam links in response? Is their unability to actualy learn and study prevents them from actualy learning about oversimplified """theories""" they support?
Why does it inflate?
...
The link spamming is because user can't actually argue a claim and depends on some image are YouTube video to argue for him. He's been posting the same shit in the occasionally thread for the past week or so and the threads eventually get deleted
All my math and citations are above in the thread. None have been shown to be incorrect.
You have learned new word and even know it's definition, yet you still can't use it right?
...
Holy shit.
I started this thread mocking a poor explanation for a physical phenomena ("fictitious" forces), and it filled with "where's evidence" fucktards and flat-earthers.
This board is full of imbeciles.
...
Can you actually explain you post instead of just posting without any fucking context?
But user, his math is undeniable. Irrefutable. Incomprehensible. Nonexistent, even
I don't even know what I'm supposed to be looking at, or what side of the argument he is on.
All is see is power lines without context.
Nothing makes me fucking rage more than that.
cool
It was a meme that brought in actual retards.
>the moon orbits the earth because that's a geodesic in spacetime
>1 meter + 1 meter = 2 meters
>BRO YOU'RE JUST BELIEVING IN MATH
i can't even
why not just say the angular momentum it had during its formation along with the earths gravitational field causes its tangential velocity to shift constantly?
They measure the distance to Venus and then you've got an earth-venus-sun triangle, with the angles given based on the phase of Venus, and then it's simply triangulation.
Topic aside, how did this brainlet meme come about?
but you don't have a triangle, you have a line
Also I don't think triangulation works in space
You're probably thinking of spherical geometry, where triangles constructed using great distances across the earth's surface don't behave normally because they're on the surface of a sphere (or ellipsoid; whatever) instead of on a flat plane.
In space though, there's nothing stopping us from just using euclidean geometry.
Why do we see the same stars every night through the earths rotation around the sun with only a small variance throughout the year? Yes there are different constellations but every 180 days or so we should be seeing a completely different set of stars. How does this make any sense?
Brainletfeelsguy.jpg
...
...
...
if radar bounces of the Earth why would it not bounce of Venus?
Good question
Fucking brainlets and their circular logic.
Waaagh! I cant do something myself, so no one can!
Thinking about this stuff is enough to drive a man to drink
8 inches times the distance in miles squared. Divide by 12 to get the result in feet.
metabunk.org
We see different groups of stars depending on the time of year.
The Earth is flat
The Sun and Moon are smaller and closer than we've been led to believe
Photoshop images are "science"
Metabunk is either running a social science experiment or they couldn't find someone qualified enough to render a third dimension to the towers fast enough to keep a lid on the Flat Earth.
They re are alot of photographs of those towers before Metabunk/Soundly claimed to have found the curvature of the Earth/convex water.
I think they re trying to make a monkey out of you, Anons
Good thing we all have the scientific method
pbs.twimg.com
media.gettyimages.com
upload.wikimedia.org
epa.gov
louisianadigitallibrary.org
Veeky Forums is 18+ user
I've never seen proof of such comical claims like bouncing radar beams off of Venus. I mean you'd have to be a retard or about 10 years old to believe that.
Communist Russia got to Venus
So I guess anything is possible
Trips don t lie
our side is more fun desu
cheq em
>You have no sense of dimensions. On the galactic scale, 500000mph is a slow speed. The angular velocity relative to the center of the galaxy is of less than 2x10^-6 degrees per year.It takes the Sun more than 200 million years to complete one orbit around the Galaxy.
Why is the Earth flat and the Moon and Sun isn't?
If the Moon orbits above the Earth, do you have photographs of the underside of the Moon?
We have the scientific method, please explain it to me with it.
That post is quite accurate.
Perhaps you are the brainlet here.