Does the fascist intellectual tradition have anything to offer modern political thought?

Does the fascist intellectual tradition have anything to offer modern political thought?

Nah

no

Fascism is just a shitty Modern regurgitation of monarchy and feudalism. Why would I go for the new knockoff when I can have the original?

this is one of the dumber things i have seen posted on Veeky Forums

>fascist
>intellectual
choose one

It's unironically the most Veeky Forums political ideology, you'll see this once you transcend the postmodernists. Fascists were vastly ahead of their time, but being founded by poets and professors it's no surprise

>feudalism

At least know what the word means before you make a statement about it.

There has never been such a thing as a fascist intellectual. Every single one of them was a pseud.

SUM GOOD PROSE

Oh, for fucks sake! The italian fascists hated the old, beardy conservatives.

Someone skipped his Heidegger, Plato and company

"everyone i dont like is wrong"

GOD THE PEOPLE OF THIS THREAD
americans should be fucking nuked out of existence

By definition fascism IS the most modern political thought

Mussolini didn't write much, but what he did was concise and good. He wasn't an intellectual as much as he was a politician, but he was well read.

Original fascism, the italian one, took its influences from the revolutionary socialism it was preceded by and harmonized it with Italy, as a historical, identifiable, solid phenomenon.

Protofascism is basically Sorel and French national-syndicalism.

>not being a modernist D'annunzian futurist squadrist ready to die per la rivoluzione eterna, per la patria invicibile, contra tutti nemici, contra tutti traditori

The problem with recommending D'Annunzio on Veeky Forums arises from the fact most can't read Italian. Available English translations fail to capture any of the subtle flourishes of his writing. Most all of them come out flat and plodding which reduces the novels to plot alone.

>fascist intellectual tradition

It's an inherently anti-intellectual tradition.

Fascism seems to be a pragmatic ideology not based on a strict theoretical framework but rather on popular action and the poetic/aesthetic

Are there any philosophers that can be thought of as fascist?

Plato was never a fascist, the republic being the best evidence against this view

No one will take you seriously when you use the word unironically.

>tfw when mexicans won't attempt an fascist-aztec revival

The Crimson Serpent was a good book.

>Are there any philosophers that can be thought of as fascist?
Hegel, Plato and that's about it. The other german idealists went back to being just normal reactionaries as were most of the authoritarian philosophers..

Antifa position s are inherently anti intellectual

What ideology is "pure"?

Heidegger, Spengler, Schmitt, Sorel, Eliade, de Benoist