Any great book about getting redpilled about women and their sexuality?

schopenhauer was pretty bitter towards women... i mean 'redpilled'

start with him

Those people seem insufferably insecure in ways they probably don't have the balls or brains to realise.

>Bukowski
"UUuuuuuuuuhhhnnnnn ooohhhh yeahh bitch look at me I'm a DIRTY OLD MAN aahha you slut!! ohhhhh boy I lovvveee cigarettes and BOOZE!! Look at my DIRTY OLD MAN DICK hahaha!! I'm so fuckin SAD and MEAN but COOL all at the same time! I fuck sluts allllllll day pal, oh yeah then I go home and I DRINK and SMOKE like a MAN! A DIRTY OLD MAN!! My parents were MEAN and I had ACNE when I was a teenager so now I a COOL WRITER who DRINKS and FUCKS and SMOKES and is SOOOO COOOL all the FUCKIN time!! My self insert is just so FUCKIN COOL like ME!!"

"Factotum" and "Ham on Rye" are his only good books. The Chinaski character just becomes a fucking character by time you get to Women or Post Office.

All his poetry is just proto-edgelord shit.

It's fun to like things

...

I'm not saying you can't like it! I had fun reading Women for a little bit. It just gets monotonous as fuck at a certain point,,, like,,, we get it Charlie, you like sluts with big tits and booze.

I'm standing by my remark on his poetry though. It was probably really refreshing when it first came out, but it has not aged well. I feel like I'm reading the diary of a 15 year old who cuts himself because his Dad smacks him sometimes.

...

I agree with your point that contemporary shitposting is derivative of much of Bukowski's work. You're also not wrong that his fiction has little to no range.

>get married at 18 like a hadji or 19th century coal miner
>it doesn't work out
>This is proof civilisation is collapsing
>this is proof women are awful
>and here is a picture from a work of fiction to trigger you
This is bait

Cool. Still feel free to like it though!

Junk food tastes good too.

>dude just accept getting constantly cucked and emasculated like me lmao

...

Just watch pornography with a critical eye. You'll never be able to look at them the same way.

Masculinity has nothing to do with security, however, it is something earned and not given.

>it is something earned and not given.
what

You allow yourself to be emasculated when a relationship doesn't work out. People who feel like they've been "cucked" or whatever put too much of THEIR value into the women they date. Keep your self worth out of women's pants.

I deleted my comment because I realised his bullet points are solid. That said, don't get me wrong, there's a pretty high chance a girl will have slept with more people than the current guy she's seeing but personal experience tells me that this board grossly over-exaggerates the amount of men they perceive women to have slept with.

Of course, sex is easier for girls to attain but I know plenty who eschew one-night stands. There's no one-size-fits-all glove.

Good advice. A little bit of self-awareness goes a long way.

>People who feel like they've been "cucked" or whatever put too much of THEIR value into the women they date. Keep your self worth out of women's pants.
but men are not able to do this in the long term; women always win at providing valuation

That's not the point of the screenshot.

The point is, women work differently than men. Specifically, they can't into man's honor, and thus they also can't into fidelity.

men cheat more often than women, that's statistically proven

>women always win at providing valuation
What are you on about? Are you trying to say women will always eventually make a man base his self-worth off of her?

No.

Men admit to have cheated more often than women. Because men tend to crack more easily. Because, unlike women, men tend to have a concept of honor.

THAT is what's statistically proven.

this and everything else by weininger, he's schopenhauer on meth

>I'm standing by my remark on his poetry though. It was probably really refreshing when it first came out, but it has not aged well. I feel like I'm reading the diary of a 15 year old who cuts himself because his Dad smacks him sometimes.
I lolled, good post, good cynicism

How does that pertain to anything?
You CHOOSE what you base your self worth and identity off of.
Choose to base your identity off of the thoughts and feelings that make you who you are. Base it off your passions, not the object of those passions.

Reminder that any song written by men is about being dumped by roasties

FREE LOVE ON THE FREE LOVE FREEWAY
THE LOVE IS FREE BUT THE FREEWAY'S LONG

I GOT SOME

HOT LOVE ON THE HOT LOVE HIGHWAY, AND I'M

GOING HOME CAUSE MY BABY'S GONE, SHE'S GONE

This is so far from the truth. I see instances of women cheating and being unfaithful far more often than I do men. Women just absolutely hate accepting that they were/are the bad person in the relationship, and will admit to it a lot less. Men are more willing to just accept that they fucked up and move on.

This is really cynical and reading it makes me feel uncomfortable, but it's completely true.

This is what I'd imagine Tupac would write if he was white and born in the late 80's.

what happens when you have no trouble picking up girls but you just live in a shitty area with no women you can stand to be around for more than 30 minutes?

Old men doing movies

I think that was the point.

This.
WOMEN NEED SEXUAL EXPERIENCE BEFORE YOU SETTLE DOWN WITH THEM.
THERE'S NOTHING WRONG WITH HAVING SEX WITH DIFFERENT PEOPLE.

only if you think sex matters, which it does for women and numales only, ie for hedonists

>Men admit to have cheated more often than women.

Yes

>Because men tend to crack more easily.
M-maybe...?

>Because, unlike women,
Oh boy.

>men tend to have a concept of honor.
I sense heavy rationalization going on here.

>THAT is what's statistically proven
I didn't know you could scientifically agree on something as philosophically vague as "having a concept of honor" let alone prove a statistically reliable dissonance between men and women on the matter. You've truly enlightened me to the extent that I feel Euphoric.

At least take comfort in the fact that the contingent of women who do not act in that way are also outside that user's scrutiny and as such invisible to him. Like a man trying to find a star with a microscope.
That said, that contingent of women has its own host of problems

The Satanic Witch.
So good people actually advice you not to read it!

>SOCIETY USED TO BE STRUCTURED THIS WAY BUT UNFORTUNATELY IT ISNT
> HOWEVER I KEK OTHER GUYS HEHEHEHE BE LIKE ME

In short:
>MUH DICK IS SINGLE-DICKEDLY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DOWNFALL OF MONOGAMY
>BUT REALLY IT'S WOMEN'S FAULT, THEY CANT CONTROL THEMSELVES, JUST LOOK AT THEM
> BUT WOMEN AND MONOGAMY ARE TREMENDOUS, BELIEVE ME

Reminds me of whenever neo-confederates are talking shit about "race mixing" but then you remember all the slave masters fucking their slaves.

This makes me sad. I love a girl but it's post like these and my past experiences that make feel awful.

>I see instances
wow really, do your perceptions count for everyone?

>According to The New York Times, the most consistent data on infidelity comes from the University of Chicago's General Social Survey (GSS). Interviews with people in non-monogamous relationships since 1972 by the GSS have shown that approximately 12% of men and 7% of women admit to having had an extramarital relationship.[6] Results, however, vary year by year, and also by age-group surveyed. For example, one study conducted by the University of Washington, Seattle found slightly, or significantly higher rates of infidelity for populations under 35, or older than 60. In that study which involved 19,065 people during a 15-year period, rates of infidelity among men were found to have risen from 20 to 28%, and rates for women, 5% to 15%.[7] In more recent nationwide surveys, several researchers found that about twice as many men as women reported having an extramarital affair.[8] A survey conducted in 1990 found 2.2% of married participants reported having more than one partner during the past year. In general, national surveys conducted in the early 1990s reported that between 15-25% of married Americans reported having extramarital affairs.[9] Treas and Giesen found that people who had stronger sexual interests, more permissive sexual values, lower subjective satisfaction with their partner, weaker network ties to their partner, and greater sexual opportunities were more likely to be unfaithful.[10] Studies suggest around 30–40% of unmarried relationships and 18–20% of marriages see at least one incident of sexual infidelity.

>admit to having had an extramarital relationship
>admit to

woman: "I'd never lie to you! :)" *cakes face in clown makeup to enhance secondary sex characteristics, wears special titty-hoisting bra, wears skintight clothing to perk everything up, wears shirt with titty window cut out to show titty, wears shoes that deform entire body to jut out sex characteristics that men like*

why would they lie in anonymous surveys
this post screams
>I'm so afraid of women SO AFRAID

Relationships are-- almost--always more complicated than they appear from the outside. This goes double for celebrity relationships, which are half media-and-public property and, used as such, have to be viewed as such. We're never very careful with the things that don't actually belong to us, even as we impute all kinds of perverted values onto them.

I would not call someone who is insecure a man.

>Interviews with people in non-monogamous relationships since 1972
>non-monogamous

How did they determine if was infidelity?

It's ok if you disregard the 'story' part. Also, if your goal in itself is to fuck as many women as possible, sex just becomes a superior form of masturbation.

Reel tuff guy, here

i'm scared of anything without a soul that superficially acts like a human yeah

>sex just becomes a superior form of masturbation.
it is just a superior form of masturbation