So the torus is the fundamental mathematical object underlying all reality, right? (aka the monad)
Torus
Landon Ortiz
Other urls found in this thread:
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
twitter.com
Nathan Watson
>Lecture 1: 770k views
>Lecture 2: 130k views
Robert Jackson
Never forget the 600,000
Tyler Gomez
>string theory
A bunch of nonsensical bullshit and nothing else.
Ian Price
R U D E
Isaiah Powell
>I don't have a real question
>better smash some random "math" words together
>oh fuck I better make my question about reality so they think I'm deep
Jace King
>the new age hippies understood the finishing line of physics decades before you (they just didn't know the math to get there)
Embarrassing.
Blake Allen
If we discover that reality can be reduced to a single mathematical rule (be it torus or whatever else) ala Tegmark's "Mathematical Universe Hypothesis" then that rule could be easily programmed and executed. It might run slowly, but its internal reference frame wouldn't notice. Really makes you think.
Zachary Rodriguez
haha totally
Nicholas Mitchell
A monad is a monoid in the category of endofunctors, not a torus silly
Leo Phillips
Liam Turner
Technically it's a monoid object, not a monoid.
Jeremiah Wilson
I think it is in this lecture series that Susskind gets to the part where he discusses a string of length [math]\pi[/math] and THEN DEMURS GREATLY REGARDING THE ORIGIN OF THE IDEA TO CONSIDER STRINGS WITH THAT LENGTH
Ryan Kelly
t. brainlet
Lucas Thomas
It's just a convention.
Jaxon Parker
How do I graph a torus in desmos?
Liam Flores
Charles Rivera
Why watch the general public brainlet lectures when you can watch physishit version by Hirosi Ooguri?
Josiah Murphy
The lecture in the OP isn't one of his general public lectures, it's from the actual class.
James James
the circle would fit that description desu
Evan Cruz
Could well be, since a torus is a product of two circles.