I've made a new number it's called "foon" and it comes between nine and ten

youtube.com/watch?v=K4_JHwq3F0w

Fuck. Mines way better though

is foon thousands over 9000?

As a platonist, I must say that you discovered the number foon.

s-shut UP!!!

Yes

10 > foon > 9

10*1000> foon *1000 > 9 * 1000

10000> foon thousands > 9000

thanks user
then foon thousands

all is lost, you have caused a chain reaction that will result in the end of all ends,

now every number in existence is altered, therefore everything is forever altered in every measurement by number, you fool, you foolish fool !

Creating new numbers serves no purpose since you can just use different base systems.

but lottery gets much more difficult to win

The amount of numbers would still be the same as if they used a base-11 number system for it.
Base-11 numbers: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,A
Numbers including foon: 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,foon

and if it is a base-foon number system?

Then it would be the same as a base-10 number system.
The only difference is that after 9 it would be foon.
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,foon,foon1,foon2...etc.
However, once you reach 20 it would return to normal.

is it even or odd

yeah right but does it fly

where the fuck is it on the keyboard

Nah but this is in base 10, you just put a number between 9 and 10. This way, when you have an integer between nine and ten, it's foon

Are you a brainlet? OP clearly stated that foon is a NEW NUMBER. Not a rebranded number, a new number. Decimal 10 = binary 1010 = same number. Foon =! Any number that exists.

It's non-binary

oh no oh no oh no

φ (phi)? þ (thorn)?

I just proved the foon root of foon is a rational number

But as a Pythagorean, I must say that Foon is neither even nor odd, so it cannot fulfill either being an even-by-odd number, odd-by-even number, nor an even-by-even number, so if it is not unity, it does not exist.

/thread with a philosophy that actually has some backbone unlike modern mathematics which is completely fine with saying foon would exist.

90 right?

So 9.5?

Wow....

yeah that's right. Foon is becoming a number after all.

this thread still goin on? lel

Poon, or what normalfags would call 4.5
10 x poon is my favorite number.

what number's between foon and 10?

foon.foon

Its obviously base-11.

Base10:
[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9] -> 10
ten characters

BaseOPisafaggot:
[0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A] -> 10
eleven characters

Base2:
[0 1] -> 10
Two characters

Base4:
[0 1 2 3] -> 10
4 characters

"Ten" doesn't mean all your fingers. It means "10"

Base 10 | Base 3:
0 | 0
1 | 1
2 | 2
3 | 10
4 | 11
5 | 12
6 | 20
7 | 21
8 | 22
9 | 100
10 | 101

is it prime?

no because it's not an element of Z

it's the year 988,546,343,567,129,036,703 BCE
you too can be the treasurer of your own intellectual currency
here is your new symbol and number!

Hmm pretend this is the Foon, closest looking symbol until they make a package to update it to contain it.
Some various properties of it
[eqn]9\varphi < \varphi^2 < 10\varphi[/eqn]
[eqn]\frac{1}{10} < \frac{1}{\varphi} < \frac{1}{9}[/eqn]
[eqn]|\varphi - 9.5| < \frac{1}{2} [/eqn]

Too much for zblock

Does the introduction of foon lead to a numeral system with base 11, or is foon a non-integer and we can continue to use base 10?

Rev. Thomas J.A. Freeman already propsed that in the The American Catholic Quarterly Review, Band 18 in 1893. He called the 11-th number "t." instead of "foon".

books.google.de/books?id=I9E1AQAAMAAJ&pg=PA205&lpg=PA205&dq=undecimal number system&source=bl&ots=m3TUtmRGUu&sig=gIqTarhElNVyUCjsBl8OkiqsDYE&hl=de&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjj1N-ipqXZAhVGzKQKHWe0ChE4ChDoAQg6MAM#v=onepage&q=undecimal number system&f=false

t. user

No, you don't understand at all. Base 10 with foon added is not base 11, it's just base 10 with foon added. Foon is an integer between 9 and 10, where 9 and 10 are represented in base 10. You could also have base 2 with foon added: foon would be an integer between 1001 and 1010 where 1001 and 1010 are now binary representations.

Hmm... Yes... The properties of the ingenious 'foon' are intriguing indeed

Very nice.

what about gaussian primes

this

Fooneven and foonodd
9, fooneven, foonodd, 10
Base 12
Fixed it

...

it can't be a gaussian ptime because foon^2 is still not in Z

You've got brain damage. All new numbers in higher base systems come after 9 and before 10.
Base11:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A 10
Base12:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B 10
Base13:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C 10
Base14:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D 10
Base15:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E 10
Hexadecimal:
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 A B C D E F 10
...
95 96 97 98 99 9A 9B 9C 9D 9E 9F 100

.foonfoonfoonfoonfoonfoon... = 1

Wouldn't it be between 80 and 90?

Yes, but base 10 with foon added is not a "higher base system". It is base 10 with foon added.

unfortunately we have lost field properties

A real, rational and complex question:

Is Foon an Natural? Integer? Rational? Real? or Complex Number?

Or Is it just Imaginary?

Foon is an integer between 9 and 10. Integer!