>diversity hire
>white dude who held everything together quits
>replaced with more diversity
>all whites and asaians eventually quit
>culture diminishes and nobody of quality wants to work there anymore
>parking lot is empty now
Why do restaurants do this again? I hate seeing a place I like go to the gutters
How do you know if someone was a diversity hire?
I don't like the term "diversity hire", you make it seem like only white people can be competent employees which is inherently racist, the old fashioned kind of racist, not the new wave internet kind where using black people emojis is racist.
>it's another /pol/ thread barely even attempting to appear on-topic
Nazi Nazi go away, gas some Jews another day.
>only white people can be competent
Prove this statement wrong, newfags
Yeah, fuck minorities, am I right? Trump!
I work for the government, the one that institutes "preferential hiring" of minorities. They don't make it. The area I work in is very intensive about work quality and quantity and even though "they" get hired as often as quality varieties, they simply don't stick.
Internet or Alabama racists, either, should see it here, they would cum their pants with validation.
when a colored person is hired instead of a more qualified white person because a successful team of white people running a business start feeling generous and want to look open minded by showing that they're dumb enough to hire a colored person and expect them to act like a white person even though there are no qualifications or reasons to believe that this is what will be the case and the odds being heavily against them. that's a diversity hire. as if diversity of fucking race was what makes a team strong instead of diversity of skills and perspectives. as if everyone being the same race in a workplace wouldn't actually make everyone more comfortable and team spirited.
if there's not some extenuating circumstance, there's no reason to go out on a limb and hire people that aren't going to fit into a workplace. there's just no disadvantages to a homogeneous team.
Not him but there's a difference between a diversity hire and hiring a black/asian/whatever person. There are incredibly talented and hardworking people in any race, and hiring them is no issue. It's when people get hired specifically because there's not enough black people/asians/whatever that people get unhappy. A diversity hire is a hire for diversity reasons, rather than just hiring the best person for the job and they happen to be black.
That doesn't answer the question of how you know whether someone was hired to "increase diversity", you just explained what a diversity hire is.
Never seen this happen because I go to nice restaurants. I didn't even know diversity hires were a thing in restaurants.
You can easily tell by the quality of work. For example at my local wal mart, when the sandwhiches are stocked, I always notice the asian women behind the counter. When the sandwhiches are near empty and unorganized, the counter usually has nogs
are you telling us that you're incapable of even imagining the ability to discern someones intentions, and someones ability?
So you know based on assumption then.
>see asian women
>quality of work is neat
>see diversity hires, a rotation of them because they don't last long
>quality of work is messy
>this has been going on for months
It really isn't hard to put 2 and 2 together user.
Don't they get potential tax write-offs if they can prove that they have a diverse work place? I always figured they wouldn't be doing it unless money is involved. Claim benefits of hiring them and hope they quit soon.
But how do you know they were hired for diversity? How do you know they weren't hired because they were willing to work for lower pay, or were able to work during hours that other employees couldn't, or through nepotism (which I agree is also wrong, but is a different issue entirely)?
so let me guess, a black person puts a gun in your face and says give me your money while you're walking home from a movie at night in the city, and you'd think it was racist to assume he was mugging you.
it boggles my mind to imagine people this oblivious, that they can't read other peoples actions and behaviors and come to conclusions. because that's a basic people skill. basic human survival instinct kind of stuff.
>lower pay
It's wal mart, it's fucking minimum wage retard
>different hours
My observation is always near lunch hour.
Quit making excuses and relying on fringe hyperboles. It really isn't hard to notice a pattern based on race and if you visit a place often, you will remember the employees
I don't know if it's relevant for this thread or not, but in places I have worked those questions area easily answered:
>lower pay
Nope, pay there was flat. Everyone got paid the same.
>hours
everyone works the same hours
>nepotism
I don't think the openly racist white owners hired minorities due to nepotism. Possible? Sure. Likely? Not very.
Like the other user said, it's not hard to put 2 and 2 together.
Are you talking about Burger King?
daily reminder that Veeky Forums is a democratic socialist board and cheeto drumpfkins need to fuck off back to /pol/
#punchNazis
Maybe, I remember going there with a buy one get one free coupon and I still felt ripped off. The food was cold, food trays were overstuffed by the lazy staff. I never went to a Burger King in years because of this experience
If it's a company that has the potential to be under scrutiny by the lens of the government it's a good idea since they can get reamed in the was for potential discriminatory hiring practices. If course, there are ways around this, but it's hard and not worth the time when you can rotate out a steady stock of minorities instead.
>I suck at life so bad that my career is threatened by a Mexican who barely speaks English
What did people like this think adulthood would be like? Genuinely curious.
The avocado ponderer is still the most unsettling image I have ever seen on 4chins
Who are you quoting user? Nobody here made that assumption. This thread is talking about spending money at restaurants.
>Nobody here made that assumption.
OP pretty much did. Read between the lines, spergie.
blame (((affirmative action)))
Working at mcDonalds must be back breaking
Spending money consistently at a local joint implies one already has a decent job and you're simply implying one's race which is quite racist.
Go back to /pol/
>Spending money consistently at a local joint implies one already has a decent job
Stop taking things so literally, spergie.
>>and you're simply implying one's race which is quite racist.
It's not necessarily racist, it's statistically accurate to discuss Mexicans in the context of food workers. And even if user meant to be racist, are you seriously surprised about racism on Veeky Forums? Is this your first day here?