What's the best molecular biology textbook and why is it Alberts?

What's the best molecular biology textbook and why is it Alberts?

Other urls found in this thread:

hub.jhu.edu/2017/11/07/fixing-replication-crisis-in-science/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>biology
>science
HAHAHAAHHA

You know, biologists students are the good looking ones.

Ok so good looking ditsy sluts study biology
That literally makes it psychology-tier trash
Please consider studying a real subject

Who gives a shit about your definition of trash? Enjoy yourself with your autistic math comrades and let grown people solve real world problems.

>solve real world problems
As becoming a Nurse who clean shit, vomit, blood and piss everyday.

Or becoming a Parasitologist Medic who treats Worm infestation, dealing with shit everyday

>Still not proving biology is a science
C O P E
O
P
E

Can biologists sum one and one?

Mol-bio is pretty much biochemistry, so yeah.

>Low reproducibility rate
>Science

Could you repeat that? the 'replication crisis' in biomedical research
>The pharmaceutical company Bayer conducted its own reproducibility tests on 67 published experiments and failed to get similar results on 53.
hub.jhu.edu/2017/11/07/fixing-replication-crisis-in-science/

You still haven't proven anything. Bio is non objective and therefore NOT A SCIENCE

This topic has been interesting me for some time, and this particular book has been recommended to me. Any idea where I could find a torrent that contains it? My searches so far has failed.

>Bio is non objective
?

>torrent
libgen.io
Not a torrent but you can get it there.

So Veeky Forums is absolutely useless when it comes to discussing bio. Good to know.

Lots of teenagers here preoccupied more with their image rather than an interest in science unfortunately.

children here are not cerebrally capable of discerning between molecular biology and biology

try the one on pic related or molbio of the gene

for genetics maybe hartwell or klug, for biochem maybe berg or lehninger

Biology is easier than ANY Engineering discipline.

>Science

biology is an engineering discipline
it's not 1760 anymore buddy

Alberts doesn't really have any competition in what it tries to be, iirc, which is relentlessly comprehensive. You couldn't possibly cover all of it in a single semester course, but from what I can tell Alberts is the standard reference and is frequently updated with recent research.

This

everytime someone posts about biochem or has a biology-related problem, the kids here never post because brainlets unfortunately

>bio is non-objective
What the fuck am I reading?

i liked the cooper and hausman the cell

>You still haven't proven anything
what do you think molecular bio is?

engineering isn't science