Some political boi on reddit thinks he knows what water is

Attached: total loss of function.png (887x208, 24K)

Other urls found in this thread:

reddit.com/user/AlphaGoGoDancer
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

what do pure water with no impure taste liek

Weird salvia

>where dies it stop
>1% soda then it as not water
obviously it stops at less than 1%, impurities are usually only 0.001%

This is on a shittyask sub, isn't it.

Nice job outing yourself.

reddit.com/user/AlphaGoGoDancer

Shit, this guy was serious? I get that he's sort of following a writing prompt, but goddamn.

you think you're better? it's obvious to everyone here you are a reddit fag. please empty your desk and leave Veeky Forums forever

I can tell by the delta in the flair it's "change my view". Screencaps pop up everywhere because it's just as bad as you'd guess.

Unless you only consider 100% pure H2O to be "water" then this is obviously true.

he's actually not wrong
what we call water is not one specific chemical or mixture of chemicals, but if you see water you intuitively know it's water.

alt-righters turn their brain off when they read the word "social construct" then mumble something about facts not caring about feelings

Sounds like semantics to me. Any identifiable form of matter could be a social construct if we're following this logic.

blah blah cultural marxism blah sjw

Any classification is. Saying "these kinds of things are X, and other kinds of things are not" is a matter of custom.

Well we have constructed groups for things, socially

>reddit

>obsessed with some political boi on reddit
just stop; fgt pls

>Saying "these kinds of things are X, and other kinds of things are not" is a matter of custom.
but that's just nominalism
is social constructivism just a new name for nominalism?

Actually our lexicon generally refers to potable water, as most other kinds of water are have an adjective attached (sea water)
Calling it a social construct in an attempt to redefine words is insanity. That's why the OP post sounds like something a highschooler would post.
Also screaming "MUH ALT RIGHT" makes you look equally pathetic.

So only drink distilled water and strip the nutrients from your body, got it.

imagine having political trolls on the internet living in your head rent-free to this extent.

But he's right.

I think humans can be seen as social constructs.

If you allow for bacteria, when do we stop being human? If someone is 99% human and 1% bacteria, we just call that ??? and not human.

Lexica are social constructs, dear child.

Were you too lazy to find an analogy that works or something?

were you too lazy to find an interesting argument

FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS

He's right though.

IQ 136

Sounds like he's advocating white supremacy. Literally one-drop-rule.

An argument against what?

Not how that works

FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS

Saying "these kinds of things are nominalism, and other kinds of things are social constructivism" is a matter of custom.

good meme
but do social constructivists actually disagree with nominalists about anything?

What is he actually saying, though? So yeah, meaning in language is subjective, and words are not identical with the objects they refer to. But is this going anywhere?

Just another "paradox" of the heap.
Human language is inherently vague but good enough to work for most people most of the time, news at 11.

A priori no. Some do surely but it's not necessary.
That's yet another thing you gotta be wary of when you use human language. We tend to create dichotomies when we have different words, and sometimes we shouldn't.
Nominalism and the concept of words as social constructs are not competing or opposed lines of thought.

I suppose he wants to remind people that social constructs are not completely removed from physical objects, and that our interactions with even very simple things like water are affected by culture and subject to intentional as well as accidental change.

This is of course nothing new. But it bears repeating, like most truths.

>But it bears repeating
why

Because it's true, and because a number of people deny it.

>browsing reddit
neck yourself, faggot

That's an impossibly low bar.