Attached: total loss of function.png (887x208, 24K)
Some political boi on reddit thinks he knows what water is
Gavin Bailey
Other urls found in this thread:
Jonathan Fisher
what do pure water with no impure taste liek
Landon Torres
Weird salvia
Dylan Lopez
>where dies it stop
>1% soda then it as not water
obviously it stops at less than 1%, impurities are usually only 0.001%
Dylan Hernandez
This is on a shittyask sub, isn't it.
Nice job outing yourself.
Oliver Johnson
Owen Reyes
Shit, this guy was serious? I get that he's sort of following a writing prompt, but goddamn.
Jacob Ramirez
you think you're better? it's obvious to everyone here you are a reddit fag. please empty your desk and leave Veeky Forums forever
Joseph Reyes
I can tell by the delta in the flair it's "change my view". Screencaps pop up everywhere because it's just as bad as you'd guess.
Zachary Roberts
Unless you only consider 100% pure H2O to be "water" then this is obviously true.
Christopher Roberts
he's actually not wrong
what we call water is not one specific chemical or mixture of chemicals, but if you see water you intuitively know it's water.
Josiah Howard
alt-righters turn their brain off when they read the word "social construct" then mumble something about facts not caring about feelings
Christopher Martinez
Sounds like semantics to me. Any identifiable form of matter could be a social construct if we're following this logic.
Jose Richardson
blah blah cultural marxism blah sjw
Levi Rogers
Any classification is. Saying "these kinds of things are X, and other kinds of things are not" is a matter of custom.
Lincoln Roberts
Well we have constructed groups for things, socially
Camden Moore
Lucas Moore
>obsessed with some political boi on reddit
just stop; fgt pls
Ryder Johnson
>Saying "these kinds of things are X, and other kinds of things are not" is a matter of custom.
but that's just nominalism
is social constructivism just a new name for nominalism?
Chase Baker
Actually our lexicon generally refers to potable water, as most other kinds of water are have an adjective attached (sea water)
Calling it a social construct in an attempt to redefine words is insanity. That's why the OP post sounds like something a highschooler would post.
Also screaming "MUH ALT RIGHT" makes you look equally pathetic.
William Cox
So only drink distilled water and strip the nutrients from your body, got it.
Brayden Turner
imagine having political trolls on the internet living in your head rent-free to this extent.
Xavier Russell
But he's right.
Daniel Moore
I think humans can be seen as social constructs.
If you allow for bacteria, when do we stop being human? If someone is 99% human and 1% bacteria, we just call that ??? and not human.
Oliver Diaz
Lexica are social constructs, dear child.
Blake Bailey
Were you too lazy to find an analogy that works or something?
Cooper Edwards
were you too lazy to find an interesting argument
Logan Walker
FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS
Dylan Diaz
He's right though.
IQ 136
Adrian Clark
Sounds like he's advocating white supremacy. Literally one-drop-rule.
Jack Watson
An argument against what?
Hudson Miller
Not how that works
Chase Watson
FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS FUCK OFF REDD*T NIGGERS
Cameron Torres
Saying "these kinds of things are nominalism, and other kinds of things are social constructivism" is a matter of custom.
Owen Rodriguez
good meme
but do social constructivists actually disagree with nominalists about anything?
Bentley Russell
What is he actually saying, though? So yeah, meaning in language is subjective, and words are not identical with the objects they refer to. But is this going anywhere?
Christopher Ortiz
Just another "paradox" of the heap.
Human language is inherently vague but good enough to work for most people most of the time, news at 11.
Zachary Morgan
A priori no. Some do surely but it's not necessary.
That's yet another thing you gotta be wary of when you use human language. We tend to create dichotomies when we have different words, and sometimes we shouldn't.
Nominalism and the concept of words as social constructs are not competing or opposed lines of thought.
Matthew Cooper
I suppose he wants to remind people that social constructs are not completely removed from physical objects, and that our interactions with even very simple things like water are affected by culture and subject to intentional as well as accidental change.
This is of course nothing new. But it bears repeating, like most truths.
Noah Walker
>But it bears repeating
why
Asher Flores
Because it's true, and because a number of people deny it.
Isaiah Williams
>browsing reddit
neck yourself, faggot
Hunter Fisher
That's an impossibly low bar.