Attached: 0.(9) and 1 v.2.png (960x5205, 405K)
0.(9) and 1
Ethan Bell
Dominic Martinez
I'm seriously getting really sick of this fucking shit.
Connor Brown
The limit isn't unobtainable.
Ethan Clark
Fuck off nigger
Easton Thomas
Why would you think that we "need to obtain" the limit? That's not the point. The point is that a limit, by (the epsilon-delta) definition, is the number that we never reach, but that we can get any distance Epsilon>0 close to. We can determine what that limit is, even if that particular procedure never reaches it. We simply define that, within the real numbers, 0.999... = 1 because (assuming this wouldn't be the definition) the difference is by this definition of a limit infinitely small, and there is no real number (note the axiom of completeness) that 0.999... could correspond to by this definition apart from 1.
Joshua Gray
>putting your name under it
Owen Smith
Lmao, this fucking retard
Aiden Reyes
Prove it wrong, brainlet.
Protip: you can't
t. Kirill
Bentley Scott
1 = 0.9 + 1/10
1 = 0.99 + 1/100
1 = 0.999 + 1/1000
When will 0.999... + 1/10... not equal 1?
Never!
Brayden Hill
Yup, arbitrary number of 9s after the decimal place will never equal 1
Brody Watson
in the end 1 = 0.9... + 1/inf = 0.9... + 0 = 0.9...
Lincoln Lee
actual retard
Nathaniel Morales
1/inf = 1/Apple = 0?
Are you adequate?
Adam Barnes
>0.999... = (x-1)/x
You are actually retarded. The only way this is true is if x is infinity, and infinity/infinity is indeterminate
Ryan Gomez
>cannot multiply 10 by 0.999... because the multiplication process will never finish
Haha
Jordan Jackson
Any good fillters to auto hide these threads?
Anthony Rivera
blablabla and 0.(9) ≠ 1
Christopher Powell
Why you gotta be such a nigger, nigger
Josiah Davis
1) x never reaches infinity.
2) x - 1 is always < x
Daniel Flores
lmao, this retard is serious, thought you were trolling
kill yourself my man
Charles Anderson
Have you heard of a limit, you dumbfuck? 0.999... is not equal to (x-1)/x
Parker Rogers
If infinity is attainable:
(inf -1) /inf = (noninf - 1) /inf
and (noninf - 1) < inf
But infinity is unattainable.
Benjamin Young
BREAKING NEWS:
dumb slav is a dumb slav
Lincoln Mitchell
What is your level of education?
Jacob Ward
= of course, read my work
Tyler Nguyen
He's not, he just spams these all the time and think he's some master troll
Robert Johnson
Without discrimination, please.
All people are equal.
Austin Hall
Brody Wright
you are wrong.
Owen Long
desu in my opinion your argument is completely valid but why is it a big deal
Christopher Davis
>the amount of elements is a number (an integer). Infinity is not a number.
No, the number of elements is always a cardinal number, not necessarily an integer. It's the cardinal number aleph null, countable infinity.
You lose.
Liam Reed
I'm talking about the real world in my work.
And not about schizophrenic models.
Benjamin Mitchell
it's funny because the very first graph provides a quite elegant demonstration of what he's trying to disprove
Jack Long
Why do you retards keep replying to this same old bait everytime?
Christian Russell
You could have just said ".(9) doesn't equal 1 because I don't want it to" and saved a lot of time.
Andrew Garcia
You do not understand anything, just like the rest.
Ryder Jones
No, you're talking about math. All of your arguments are mathematically incorrect. You lose.
Ryder Howard
you should at least include a refutation of the rigorous proofs rather than just the informal ones
Noah Howard
>my work
Luke Turner
You do not see a errors in classical mathematics.
Many professional scientists have not seen errors in classical physics.
Christopher Jenkins
I only see the errors you've made in high school students' homework. I don't see what mathematics and physics has to do with it.
Henry Nelson
Let's consider one of the proofs:
1/3 = 0.333...
1/3 x 3 = 0.333... x 3 = 0.999...
1/3 x 3 = 3/3 = 1
0.999... = 1
Here are the error:
1/3
Andrew Brown
You do not even try to prove your words.
Landon Fisher
real question, why are you replacing infinity with colors like a fucking massive fucking autismo
Owen Cruz
>You lose.
cringe
Austin Anderson
you don't need to actually perform the computation to know that (0.3)*2 is (0.6)
Adam Butler
read work
Matthew Smith
we must turn the first into the second
we need the infinity of time
(if we can multiply them)
Mason Evans
we don't need to do the computation to know the result of the function
Wyatt Collins
Face it brainlet, 3*0.333... does not exist since it's impossible to compute
Colton Fisher
You can not end the process =>
=> You can not do this multiplication =>
=> Consequently, they are not equal.
Carson Morgan
There are many other computations that are impossible to perform by hand that don't involve infinity at all. Are those also impossible to derive a final value for?
Michael Scott
Such as?
Benjamin Collins
Who is saying by hand? Nothing can compute 3*0.333... since it would require infinite time
John Gomez
if .999... isn't a number because it is infinite does that mean that pi and e aren't numbers so can't be multiplied?
Henry Edwards
if there is a function which is impossible to compute the output value of by hand but doesn't involve infinity, we have to implicitly trust in some separately known relationship that lets us perform the calculation. if OP trusts the results of that calculation then it shouldn't matter to OP whether you have to perform every step of the computation or not.
Charles Ortiz
?
0.333... does not exist in reality.
1/3 - We can not finish this process
Josiah Harris
also to expand on this are you also implying that partial fractions don't work?
Grayson Powell
...
Eli Roberts
sorry meant continued fraction
Oliver Carter
you're just dodging the question
Jordan Parker
Infinity is not a number
Connor Parker
No one is saying by hand you fucking retard. NOTHING can compute 3(0.333...). Show me how ANYTHING can compute it
Chase Stewart
Who is saying pi or e aren't numbers? Are you pretending to be an absolute retard?
William Jones
both pi and e have infinitely many decimal places following them yet somehow we can multiply and divide them just fine. This contradicts your argument as to why .99999... cannot be multiplied? Also you cannot say that .999... is infinity.
Have you ever studied math in a formal setting? (ie. not your calc 1 course)
Lucas James
I have already said everything, the answers to your questions are in the work and in the subject
I'm tired of repeating the same thing. This is a symptom of idiocy.
Nolan Garcia
you don't need to compute it. you can just find the answer without computing it.
Adam James
How do you multiply pi by 2?
Dylan Baker
How are you finding the answer?
Ethan Myers
approximately equal - is not "equal"
Bentley Russell
induction
Jaxon Murphy
You are wrong
Henry Peterson
We know the value of an unattainable limit. ONLY.
Nolan Campbell
We do not perform multiplication, we just put the "equals" symbol.
Chase Lee
i'm not
Ayden Butler
But multiplication is impossible.
Joshua Morales
Yes you are. See
Angel Jenkins
We assume that we know.
fixed
Joseph White
Nevermind i suck dicks, multiplication is possible.
Nolan Nguyen
Tyler Sanchez