heidegger wins
Heidegger wins
...
Agreed
No fair he has the nazis in his corner
Then again...
>When you've read both and know that Witty arrives (more or less) to the same conclusions as Derrida who is Heidegger's best heir.
reminder: this is a continental board
Both Heidegger and Wittgenstein are continental Europeans.
Heidegger was a shroom eating degenerate
and?
source please
It is incorrect to associate Wittgenstein with the Anglo-American tradition of philosophy. He has his roots in the work of Frege, who was German.
His philosophy pretty muchs demands doing some sort of psychedelic
Ego death is the only legit way to see your authentic self
Heidegger more like High Nigger
>Ego death is the only legit way to see your authentic self
Sein zum Tode =! Ego death
>This debate
Cute
Though the same age, Hitler was two years behind Wittgenstein, and was eventually kicked out of the school for being too stupid.
What's the difference? I really see no difference between Heidegger/Wittgenstein.
Not even baiting. It's the same thing except they came at it from slightly different angles but still full autistic atheist Kierkegaard
"You can't no nuffin'." - Heidegger
"You can't no nnuffin'." - Wittgenstein
gee, I wonder who won?
... and then he took over the country
one starts anti-language, the other pro-language, and both land in the same place. they both had pretty material changes to their philosophy before they came together, so if someone read just the early versions of the two, they'd see them pretty far apart - although, even then, they are getting at similar things.
...and then lost a war he could have won and killed himself.
thats exactly what i said
I know... SO FUCKING EPIC
yeah, i agree. calm down mate. was just trying to explain why they're thought of so differently by some.
did they both accept catholicism at the end of their lives?
good point
what was heidegger's theory of what math is?
this man knows
fuck off, badiou
Not how it works
...after committing the Holocaust that didn't happen.
Wasn't Heidegger's theory of logic very close to Wittgenstein's later one? "Disclosed" (grammatical) truth precedes logical formalism, which is all that math is.
So, math would be an extremely formalised logical language whose ontological/grammatical a prioris are given.
KANT won.
And these are both sore losers.
yeah
Who is a hack