Alright lets see how good you are. Are there more odd numbers or odd and even numbers ?
Alright lets see how good you are. Are there more odd numbers or odd and even numbers ?
Matthew Foster
Other urls found in this thread:
wolframalpha.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
Lincoln Reed
No
Bentley Thomas
more odds since all negative numbers are odd
Lincoln Russell
define "more"
in the poset of subsets of the naturals ordered by subsets, the odd numbers are strictly below the naturals
but the odd numbers are also equicardinal with the naturals
John Mitchell
Get outta here and go back to Hilbert's Hotel!
Ethan Perry
[math] \aleph_0 [/math]
Hunter Ramirez
depends on what set of numbers you're using
Julian Moore
Hitler's Hotel never ran out of room either.
Caleb Evans
All odd numbers have a negative equivalent
Almost all even numbers have a negative equivalent
0 and -0 are the same thing
Because 0 has no proper negative equivalent, there is one fewer even number than odd
QED
Evan Powell
>implying [math]\infty-1
Jonathan Lopez
not compatable with definition
wolframalpha.com
An unbounded quantity that is greater than every real number.
Michael Howard
y=x and y=x-1
tell me where they intersect
Hudson Hill
theres the same amount of both, brainlets
Ethan Nelson
There are infinitely many odd numbers and infinitely many even numbers. Infinity isn't a number you can graph.
Blake Powell
>Infinity isn't a number you can graph
Liam Scott
There are just as many even numbers as odd numbers.
>Even numbers = 2x
>Odd numbers = 2x+1
Angel Watson
>implying it is
Show me a graph of the "number infinity" on a number line. I'll wait.
Levi Ward
>what is a ray
David Torres
That's nice. But what about OP's babby-tier brainlet question?
Bentley Stewart
Brayden Jackson
Odd and even is clearly a larger infinity that just odd.
Try something harder next time.
Michael Jenkins
>brainlet
Grayson Cox
>all infinite series are the same size
rainlet
Carter Wright
the ones discussed are
brainlet
Christian Wilson
this is going in my lecture notes about compactification
Henry Lewis
No, they're not.
OP specified a series of odd numbers and a series of odd and even numbers.
A grade school student could tell you the series of odd and even numbers would be the larger infinite series. At any odd number in the first series, the second series would have nearly twice as many numbers at the same odd number.
Dominic Torres
>lectures in subway stops intensifies
your rat friends will believe you as long as you have bread to offer
Oliver Ross
they both are aleph-0 you incontinent retard
Brayden Parker
For the set of all odd numbers to be aleph-0 it must be paired with the set of all even numbers.
Jaxson Edwards
They intersect at infinity dumb dumb.
Henry Powell
or paired with all the natural numbers
or anything fucking else the size of aleph-0
Connor Murphy
There is a bijection between them, if that is what you are asking.
Cameron Ross
>odd and even numbers
>odd and even
trick question, no number is both odd and even
Jacob Kelly
his question was :
let a represent odd numbers;
let b represent even numbers;
let c = a+b;
now his question was :
"Are there more odd numbers or odd and even numbers?"
is a>c
the awser is : yeah we have more odd and even numbers.
Sebastian Fisher
I see what you did there.
Jack Harris
a, b, c are not real numbers so that doesn't work
Tyler Martinez
Adrian Collins
Depends on what mathematics you’re analyzing. Nicomachus classified numbers into three categories ‘even and odd’ ‘odd and even’ and ‘even and even’. It’s just based on the factors of the numbers involved to create that number. In truth, specifically, number types really are more complicated than people give them credit for and the two types ‘even’ and ‘odd’ is far too simplistic.