Truth or one big scam?

Minutes of actual research debunks this claim. It's obviously something low IQ groupthink trailer trash want to believe so that, in the event they find out they have any DNA that triggers them, they can claim their results were "tampered with." So they latch onto this insubstantial claim and started pushing it as not only a fact but a widespread trend as a form of preemptive damage control. When you're really stupid, this sort of thing can protect you emotionally from triggering facts.

It's amazing how quickly this board went from rather respectful, intelligent, and slow to as bad as the rest of the site. It's almost like there's a reason every single decent forum on the internet permabans far right drones and treats them like the unwelcome pollution that they are.

Of course everyone who believes this "conspiracy theory" is trailer trash stupid. Intelligent people take thee results for granted.

You're not dumb, are you goy- er friend?

Are you actually defending the practice of setting up logical loopholes to get out of facts you don't like? It's one thing to be in denial of the fact that you're doing this, but to realize it and defend it without realizing how stupid it means you are is something else entirely. Amazing.

I'm not "realizing and defending" anything. I disagree with your initial premise. To me, you're the one setting up "logical loopholes".

>t. newfag
Gotta know when to let em go, user

Attached: 18198456_1521364437887376_1893248304265725741_n.jpg (600x600, 19K)

>propagate a fake story that 23andme tampers with the results of racists so you can claim your results were tampered with if you get results you don't like

This is objectively what is happening here, it's not a matter of opinion. It's setting up a loophole so that no matter what happens, you can accept/reject facts according to your feelings.

When science is covering a "politically sensitive" issue, such as gender, climate change, race, you should be very, VERY skeptical of any results publicized.

Attached: 1508243293497.jpg (1920x2160, 368K)

Only if they contradict your feelings though. If a scientific study (or a blog written by a neckbeard) agrees with your agenda, accept it unequivocally. Also make sure to call anyone who points out that you're stupid a shill.

Why do you assume i have a problem with my "feelings" being contradicted, whatever that means? If you are the user making the posts about "logical loopholes", it seems to me that you protest too much. Maybe you are the one being scared of contradiction?

Citation needed