Everyone loves science until they get to global warming or human biodiversity

girlDog
girlDog

Everyone loves science until they get to global warming or human biodiversity.

Attached: 3E13774D-4291-4208-9846-54EB5C965D03.jpg (16 KB, 259x194)

All urls found in this thread:

researchgate.net/publication/317346941_Ancient_metalworking_in_South_America_A_3000-year-old_copper_mask_from_the_Argentinian_Andes";
link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02859340";
journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141923";
whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/1873/";
es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleoamericano";
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluefish_Caves";

SniperWish
SniperWish

The problem with "global warming" that nobody wants to acknowledge is that the environment is being destabilised by industrial carbon emissions but the people shrieking loudest about it don't care about the environment, they just want to sell the same panacea they've been shilling for the better part of two centuries - it not only lowers emissions, it also improves public safety, makes people healthier and more educated, prevents wars and international disputes, and gives everybody free and guaranteed food, housing, utilities, transport, employment and healthcare!

DeathDog
DeathDog

Industry is just supplying what the population demands, because the true cost of carbon is invisible to the population. And no, socialism won't solve anything because it doesn't work in the first place.

JunkTop
JunkTop

human biodiversity

There is diversity within the human race, there isn't considerable genetic diversity between races, they're socially constructed stereotypes.

The problem is almost every Veeky Forums user who gets bullied or smacked up the head or robbed by some black person, will come on here, see racist bullshit, and agree with it and spread it to other retards, even if they were smacked up the head or robbed the last week by a white guy. Sorry, but this is what it often comes down to. This theory is based off the desire for intellectual supremacy and an outlet for rage. Races are the same.

haveahappyday
haveahappyday

Races are the same.
Despite all evidence
Yes
Despite no evidence that they're the same
Yes
Can I see it?
.... no

Poker_Star
Poker_Star

Wrong. Amerindian higher development rate demonstrates Amerindian higher civilization potential than europeans.

Replacing all europeans with Amerindians in Americas is the optimal outcome the future could give to us.

TreeEater
TreeEater

not enough difference

RavySnake
RavySnake

this

BlogWobbles
BlogWobbles

woah guys do we really need THIS many threads

Attached: this-is-getting-ridiculous.png (287 KB, 1103x557)

Boy_vs_Girl
Boy_vs_Girl

how do we know races are the same if they don't exist?

idontknow
idontknow

WE NEED MORE THREADS
EVERYONE NEEDS TO KNOW HOW HIGH MY IQ IS
WHO CARES THAT I'LL NEVER CONTRIBUTE ANYTHING TO HUMAN CIVILIZATION
AT LEAST I GOT A 150+ IQ AND AM WHITE

Gigastrength
Gigastrength

biodiversity
one species
:thinking:

SniperGod
SniperGod

Enough difference to get rid of eurangutans.

TurtleCat
TurtleCat

I don't think more than one or two people on Veeky Forums believe that there are no differences at all between "races". The stance I take is more that there are significant genetic differences between large ethnic groups, and some of those differences directly affect intelligence and aggression, but the current criteria we use for defining "race" is woefully inaccurate. What the fuck is a "Hispanic", and what separates them from the "white" race Americans like to brag about being part of? What defines being "black"? Is it geographic, familial, behavioral, purely based on what genetic group you are most similar to?

Basically, race is real in the same sense that herbalism is real. Yeah, a chunk of it is valid, but not enough to be worth basing your entire worldview around.

Poker_Star
Poker_Star

Bruh you've been posting this shit in multiple threads. All races are different but only superficially. If American Indians are so superior to Europeans then why did they not sail across the sea first? Why did they not indistrualize first? Why have they not taken back over?

Stupidasole
Stupidasole

europeans
from aurignacian proto-gravettian to solutrean:10000 years (30000BC-20000BC)
from aurignacian-antelian to start of crop development: 9000 years(30000BC-21000BC)
from start of crop development to neolithic revolution: 10500 years (21000BC-10500BC)
from neolithic revolution to earliest use of copper: 5500 years (10500BC-5000BC)
from neolithic revolution to earliest use of tin bronze: 6700 years (10500BC-3800BC)

Amerindians:
from aurignacian proto-gravettian to clovis: 5500 years (16000BC-10500BC)
from aurignacian proto-gravettian to the start of crop development: 5000 years (16000BC-11000BC)
from start of crop development to neolithic revolution: 7000 years (11000BC-4000BC)
from neolithic revolution to copper: 3000 years (4000BC-1000BC)
from neolithic revolution to earliest use of tin bronze: 4700 years (4000BC-700 AD)

-"2003a. Tiwanaku Period (Middle Horizon) bronze metallurgy in the lake Titicaca basin: A preliminary assessment. En Tiwanaku and its hinterland, T 2. A. Kolata, (Ed.), pp. 404-434. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington D. C."
-"1997. El bronce arsenical y el Horizonte Medio. En Arqueología, antropología e historia en los Andes: Homenaje a María Rostworowski, R. Varón y J. Flores E. (Eds.), pp. 153-186. Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima."
-"researchgate.net/publication/317346941_Ancient_metalworking_in_South_America_A_3000-year-old_copper_mask_from_the_Argentinian_Andes";
-"Historia de América Andina: Las sociedades aborígenes"
-"link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02859340";
-"journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0141923";
-"whc.unesco.org/en/tentativelists/1873/";
-"es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleoamericano";
-"en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluefish_Caves";
Amerindians had a higher development rate than european. Therefore Amerindians have more civilization potential than europeans.
How is this hard to get?

Skullbone
Skullbone

But they still have shit hole countries? weird wild

eGremlin
eGremlin

Because that's not science and some people are smart enough to catch up to that

Fuzzy_Logic
Fuzzy_Logic

this. that's why i want only whites only in europe and north america, they's more diversity within a race than across races and that's the only way to preserve said diversity. adding africans and arabs to the mix will only homogenize us and make us more susceptible to diseases.

Lord_Tryzalot
Lord_Tryzalot

there is no human biological diversity

Snarelure
Snarelure

Except Amerindians have more civilizations potential than europeans.

Time to face the facts.

askme
askme

Thats like saying you have an IQ of 150 and being a lazy fuck. It basically means nothing

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Disable AdBlock to view this page

Confirm your age

This website may contain content of an adult nature. If you are under the age of 18, if such content offends you or if it is illegal to view such content in your community, please EXIT.

Enter Exit

About Privacy

We use cookies to personalize content and ads, to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our advertising and analytics partners.

Accept Exit