James Franco writes like every C-student in a the first year of a sub-par MFA writing workshop. His metaphors are clunky disasters and his characters are formless puppets. To Franco, a bloodstain is 'ketchup randomness'. He is incapable of adapting his style beyond a 'disaffected teenager'. It is average, flat, without any distinctive emotion or style. It is pompous, contrived, blandly transgressive, like a middle schooler who has just learned how to say 'fuck'. He needs some honest feedback before he continues this nonsense.
Levi Ross
No one will give it to him.
Anthony White
Sounds like what I would expect from a jew who stumbled upon fame through ethnic nepotism and created a fake image of himself as some kind of hyperintellectual savant but who was really only ever just a mentally deranged jew, and one who unsurprisingly can't write for shit.
Ian Rivera
good movie
Anthony Russell
His whole shtick is just "I'm smarter than you." He has no identity as an artist or as a person beyond that. Seriously, what did you expect?
Joseph Baker
>He needs some honest feedback before he continues this nonsense. He doesn't, though. "Success" in any artistic field is likely 3/5 due to nepotism and connections. It's not a meritocracy, at the very least.
Hudson Kelly
1/10 Why not adapt the source material to a new cause? You have no drive.
Ian Rivera
Poast some, I want to feel good about the quality of the prose in my Veeky Forums posts.
Eli Stewart
Rekt
James Martinez
poo
Julian Allen
Greatest 21st century writer.
Dylan Bell
>tfw heard this guy talk on the Colbert report where he was introduced as an intellectual Renaissance man juggling 4 degrees and writing a book >he tried to talk about the Lord of the Rings and couldn't even accurately describe the plot or characters It's an amazing feeling when you hear someone talk about something you actually know about where you realize they are complete idiots.
Zachary Kelly
One day books like these, IJ and the like, will probably be seen as postmodern masterpieces in how they highlight the disconnect between word and meaning. The MFA student doesn't know how language works -- he or she signs up for a class where they play around with different words based on aspects of those words besides their meaning, i.e. their sound, the way they modify each other, what they evoke in their cultural climate, etc.; everything other than a cohesive voice. And that is what defines our postmodern time! People want to be writers, so they LARP as writers and do thing they think is what writers do as they view it in the shallow spectacle of contemporary life, and they end up writing a fractured mess of signs, images, references, sources and meanings -- because in a time where knowledge is decided on its functionality we learn everything we can possibly know about nothing. They didn't start with the Greeks.
Brandon Bell
>the mediocrity is what makes it good
James Rogers
The mediocrity is what makes it [a] good [example of postmodern literature].
People like you are why we have this mess.
Sebastian Fisher
No, the mediocrity by definition makes it a bad example. You called it a masterpiece by virtue of shortcomings. You're a god damn moron.
Andrew Long
well I mean
he's an actor
not a writer.
he should have just gotten a ghost writer.
Lucas Thomas
Because the production of the writer in postmodernity is full of intellectual shortcomings! Learn to fucking read.
Levi Hill
I liked the film
The whole thing kind of did convince me James Franco was a pedophile though
Leo Ramirez
you stole this from goodreads
Jose Perez
>the mediocrity is what makes it good
William Rodriguez
I wouldn't be surprised if you were right, but you sound just as pompous, contrived, and average as any poor writing I could imagine him guilty of.
>envy and bitterness
Brody Hill
The mediocrity is what makes it a good example of a work produced in a mediocre culture.
Wyatt Flores
I am thoroughly afraid of becoming a James Franco type minus the money and fame
Leo Moore
dub trips all but confirms it, sorry to say.
Colton Campbell
A real masterpiece would be a writer who did start with the Greeks finding a way to write a novel which captures all of these ideas while at the same time being good.
Nobody is going to call anything which epitomizes mediocrity a masterpiece.
If you start with the Greeks you're better off than most.
Julian Bailey
>play around with different words based on aspects of those words besides their meaning
Words can't have meaning because nothing's real in my world
Cooper Murphy
Thanks for introducing the meaningless qualifier 'real' before 'masterpiece' to let me know you're talking about something completely different to me. You don't seem to get my point and you keep trying to shoehorn your point in instead. The novel wouldn't 'capture' those ideas I listed because it would have to actually embody those ideas rather than just reference them.