Most Veeky Forums twitter account? (don't plug your own)

kantbot10k

twitter.com/rhystranter

lil b
cher
ayatollah khameini

Kantbot by far. His essays (and writing quality) are actually really good, interesting and well researched.

@proustitute
@thebookslut
@criticalflame
@terrypitts
@scottesposito
@MAOrtofer
@danieljhartley

*MAOthofer

seinfeld2000

>he's attributing terrorism to marijuana use again

i like to follow accounts like this to have them sprinkled through my feed:
twitter.com/MobyDickatSea
twitter.com/the__waves
twitter.com/TweetsOfGrass

You're in luck

twitter.com/mydiarydesu

Stop shilling your terrible pseud-philosophy kantbot

none
if its on twitter its not Veeky Forums

>Not joining Frogtwitter.
Not wanting to co-opt the literary community and increase the barriers to entry by posting increasingly esoteric and obscure content that only highly read people can understand.

Its like you don't even want to bring literature into a post-postmodern era.

The problem with that is the majority of frogtwitter just straight up doesn't read the texts though. The majority of kantbots fanbase have probably only skimmed the Stanford philosophical encyclopedia on Kant, read a couple of Moldbug rants and pirated the Bell Curve before deciding they're an ""intellectual"".

All it accomplishesis a debasement of the likes of Goethe when a bunch of autistic larpers start spewing nonsensical bullshit about him.

This.

Eh, thats mainly just followers. A lot of users in the same community that have a decent amount of followers are similarly well read. He wouldn't have an audience in the first place if no one was interested in what he says. I think part of his following are just those interested in learning philosophy, reading classics and joining the community, and theres nothing wrong with that. His essays on Medium and his archive of older posts are genuinely good. At least he's getting people to read.

Twitter is objectively bad and so is anyone who uses it.

Follow @TheLitCritGuy for virtue-signalling leftist nonsense.