ITT: we share and critique writing ideas

Probably. Crazy ass shit happened during the Holocaust

>A dog gets disemboweled in a fight and eats his own guts

For what purpose?

>Crazy ass shit happened during the Holocaust
Some of it so crazy it defies the laws of nature.

Do y'all really think you can milk this forever?

Gr8b8m8

Please tell me I'm not the only one sick of seeing /pol/ in Veeky Forums.

Don't worry, we all want then to go back

Oooh maybe because the propaganda he was raised up on was all about peace for the German people, and he's just so patriotic he wants nothing more than what's best for Germany, up until he's faced with the Nazis horrific deeds

Not everyone ribbing you about the fairytale side of your little victim racket here is affiliated with pol. I've never even posted there. Information is just out these days, people know.

Quit trying to sound smart. Leave.

>"Fairytale"
kek please explain

Eh, ignore him, I'm sure he'll leave eventually.

Anyway, isn't this thread supposed to be about discussing writing ideas? Does anyone have any they want to share?

I got a few but they're mostly just unorganized idea soup

What, you don't know about the lampshades?

Ted Bundy made lampshades out of humans if that's what you're referring to... But otherwise no

Shit, me too. I really should get around to writing some of this shit down.

I'll bet five bucks he thinks the Holocaust didn't happen.

I had a dream about it, and want to practice my writing technique. Also might try to work in some ouroboros imagery

Ah shit, too late. The dog's a clone, and so is the dog he's fighting. After winning the latest match, there's a part of him that realizes what's going on, and he decided to kill himself out of spite, to hopefully stop what's happened. The guy doing the cloning expresses annoyance over how he's never been able to get that little genetic quirk out of the original dog's DNA, and it turns out the same events have already happened dozens of times before.

There's a reason jews have a reputation for being a little loose with the truth, and there's a reason this is the only historical event you get thrown in jail for questioning in much of the West. And there's a reason why so many who have claimed to be victims of it have been caught fabricating their stories, because many of those stories could not have possibly happened. And 6 million is no random number. But I'm not here to say something did or didn't happen, I'm just saying people should look into the veracity of the claims themselves because jews have routinely been caught spreading lies about in order to portray themselves as victims.

Yeah sure believe what you want just keep that antisemetic garbage faaar away from me

>And 6 million is no random number.
Yeah, maybe it's the number of Jews that died due to the Holocaust.

I also see you haven't familiarized yourself with a dictionary. The word "holocaust" refers to the mass-killing of a people. It doesn't refer to just Nazi Germany's mass-killing of Jews. I know a lot of people refer to that specifically when they say "The Holocaust", as I did above, but usually that's the one people are talking about because it's the most infamous, and usually you can tell if people are speaking of a different mass-killing that could be referred to as a holocaust by context. Words can have multiple meanings and context is important, you'd do well to remember these things.

No garbage, that's all true. But just as you want to keep it far away from yourself, I want you to be far away from me -- to leave the white country you currently reside in and move home to Israel. You'll be more comfortable there writing the antiwhite garbage you're attempting to get advice about itt.

>to leave the white country you currently reside in and move home to Israel.
>"Just because I don't agree with you doesn't mean I'm from /pol/"
>"Because you don't agree with me that must mean you're from Israel."

Could you please point to the part in my post where I used the word "holocaust"?

>"I want you to be far away from me"
Then why the fuck did you comment on my post, dumbass. Kek

You're jewish, right? So what are you doing trying to write antiwhite stories while living in a white country? Do you think this is an acceptable way for a guest to act in their host nation?

You didn't and I didn't say you did. But the image you posted did, and that's what I was referring to, since it seems to imply that because The New York Times used the word "holocaust" before WW2 ended, that it was evidence of a conspiracy or something. Though the fact that you posted the image, like it was proof of something, does make me draw the conclusion that you don't know how to use the word "holocaust".

Because I want you to write your antiwhite stories from outside of the white nation you are a guest in and clearly disrespecting by pretending that your behavior is acceptable.

Pfft, OK, you must be a Poe. Great job, 10/10.

The image highlights the recurrent use of the number 6 million prior to what is known as "the holocaust." Try to pay better attention and think things out before you post.

I'm not even a Jew I'm just sick of you people projecting against a culture that's been one of the most discriminated against in all of history... It is quite telling, however, that you immediately assume anyone who calls you out on your bigoted bullshit is a Jew.

I'm telling you, and I'm telling you nicely, that you shouldn't expect to get pats on the back when you claim you want to write antiwhite stories. You are an outsider and writing disparaging stories about the people you live among is not ok. Do you understand?

Just because a story involves Nazis doesn't automatically make it anti-white

Not every article in the image does though. The May 16th, 1903 article doesn't mention a number. Neither does the September 16th, 1903 article. Or the June 1st, 1933 article. The article on May 31st, 1936 does mention "millions" but doesn't give a more specific number of 6 million, though itdoes use the word "holocaust". The October 2nd, 1941 article also doesn't mention a number. Try to pay better attention and think things out before you post.

Most discriminated against? Did you know that the jews murdered upward of 60 million ethnic Russians after a coup they led against the native people of that state a hundred years ago this year? If you're white and defending these people under a false belief that they are victims, you need to educate yourself better.

>False belief they are victims
>Have been slaughtered more than any other race in existence
Keep trying, I know you'll get there some day

Not race, group is a more applicable word

Go ahead and suck the nearest tailpipe you can find.

Did you not read the part where I told you that jews murdered upward of 60 million Russian less than a century ago? Do you know what bolshevism was? You really don't know what you're talking about do you? Maybe you're young and don't understand the extent to which you've been lied to, I don't know. But jews are bad people, their religion is based around genocide. Their holidays celebrate their genocides of others. These people aren't innocent and they aren't your friends. They hate you. Are you familiar with the word "goyim"? That's what they call you, it means "cattle".

I thought a great story idea, but I'm not sure how to go about this, would be an occult story where everything is ambiguous. The reader can only speculate on who the members of the cult are, and depending on who those members are would depend on the how the reader may interpret the objective of the cult. The only way I could see this being possible is if it was a small town (I know, a cult in a small town, how original) and some of the cult's culture slowly just diffused into the town's culture. For instance, common things could possibly be important to the cult, like a certain flower, moon dials, colors, clothing, etc. I think it would be really interesting, but it would need a lot of planning, and I would need to improve my writing significantly.

Oh my God he thinks the Bolsheviks we're Jews... Poes law pleeeeasssse

Eh, fuck it, I'll just try it.

I used to really like Hellsing a long time ago. Shameful, I know. But I wanted to see supernatural stuff going on in an actual WWII setting. So, there's a mishmash team going around crippling the various Nazi superscience and supernatural projects that they discover. They're all different with different powers, except for the leader, who is a normal human. Except maybe not. Quincey Morris came back from the dead and had this kid as his son. He's like a high-level ghoul, pretty much immortal but has to feed on human flesh. There would be a werewolf girl because for some reason it turns me on a little, a vampire who acts as their scout due to the giant wings sprouting from his back, and a character who's basically Frankenstein's Monster crossed with Robocop.

What? Please educate yourself before speaking on matters you are uninformed about.

Try again, homie. Maybe some unbiased sources

Eh, I'm not a huge fan of "interpret as you please" because to me it always sounds like "I wrote half a book, you finish the other half", no offense. Well, I guess Roshomon was really good, but there wasn't a whole lot of interpreting you could do with that.

Also, I'm not sure on the diffusion of cult culture. It just seems to me like the boring setup that happens to the town before the protagonist arrives and shit gets real.

What do you mean interpret the objective of the cult? I'd be interested in an elaboration, if only because I'm a sucker for potentially creative twists on mystery-based fiction.

I've read each of those sources and they do not give any hint of the evidence presented in the graph.

This is why you never get into a debate with a lunatic, kids.

Also, note how the graph talks in percentages rather than in raw numbers.

Lol. There's nothing biased about those sources. Why are you trying to be deceptive? Because you're jewish and don't want others to know your people murdered tens of millions of Russians?

I don't understand why the Jews, who are implied to be homogeneous here, would outright murder 60 million people in one instance and in another undermine European ideals in a subtle way after the first instance supposedly failed?

These are empty word until you post counter evidence.

What is this image trying to convey?

Counter-evidence to your non-evidence? Do you want me to spend 10 minutes making up a fake graph too for you to be satisfied?

Jews are very homogenous -- they're known as "the tribe." I'm not sure what the other instance you're referring to is though. Undermining subtly when and where? In the west now?

That is rich coming from a nazi

>Jews are very homogenous -- they're known as "the tribe."
There are these people you may have heard of called "Christians". They're pretty big now, but they started out as Jews.

I'm pretty sure OP isn't the annoying cunt who won't shut up.

Are you really expecting anyone to take your word that you debunked the numbers in the graph? And are you really getting defensive upon me asking you to present your evidence?

Stop wasting people's time.

"He disagrees with me he must be Jewish"
You're obviously white, how can you live with the murder of thousands of Indians that you're obviously responsible for, seeing as how you're the same race... Tsk tsk tsk

>There are these people you may have heard of called "Christians". They're pretty big now, but they started out as Jews.

What in God's name are you talking about? Jews are a semitic ethnic group from the middle east.

Ok how about this: Jewish man gets stuck in attic and performs all manner of sex crimes on his young children. At the end of the book a Nazi death squad shows up and kills the man and take his three daughters as sex slaves.
Thirty years later, the three daughters are all prestigious feminist authors and activists who advocate for mass chemical castration of all men. They get women really riled up and a bunch of women start seducing men and cutting off their dicks in the middle of the night as retribution against the patriarchy. This and other acts of violence become so common that Jimmy Carter eventually caves into their demands and approves a new amendment which castrates all men and gives them hormones at a young age so they turn into females past puberty.
Well this backfires because without men to defend the country, the Mexicans invade and basically capture all the females to turn into sex slaves.
The novel ends on a scene of the three sisters slitting their wrists instead of submitting to the patriarchy.
Thoughts?

So you don't have any evidence to support your claim?

Are you really expecting anyone to take your graph at face value? Are you really getting defensive upon hearing the suggestion the graph may be misleading?

Educate yourself.

I didn't make a claim...
>being this detached from reality

Can we please ignore the idiot and actually discuss writing ideas? And not obvious bait like

How do we know the number of Jews stayed the same after the 40s? After the Great Purge? Who did the killing in the revolution? The war? The gulags after the 40s?

I'll try. Scouts honour

You suggest the graph "may be misleading," you said you had debunked it personally. And I think it's become quite clear that you weren't telling the truth.

Is it clear? Why are you not posting text sources to accompany the graph?

So you're just a third party who butted in to make a juvenile statement? Try to make that more clear next time.

So instead of having a typical cult story where the cult is trying to preserve the town, or maintain political/social power, it's never defined. It would be a secret cult that remains secret. For instance, if you believed that people that worked in the town government where the ones who comprised the majority of the cult, the reader would interpret that the cult is trying to maintain an oligarchy. If the cult had mostly business owners, then they're goal would be to maintain their businesses. If the prestigious family that has lived in the same town for many generations, then the goal would be about keeping a social status. Then there could, also, be a social issue that the cult is trying to maintain, like ethnic/racial, political, religious, etc.

I do understand problems with the story. I guess the point of the story would be to show how depending on what you pay attention to, and how you analyze information would determine the outcome of the story. I guess an example would be the R. L. Stine books where you could make a decision on how to proceed in the story, but a more sophisticated version

Well, if you're familiar with the history, you know that after the jews went on their murder spree they were purged by Stalin in the 40s and were less involved after that, eventually fleeing to the US and Israel.

What are you even talking about anymore.... Wait SHIT nevermind I never replied to you I promised, scouts honour

I think a better version would be to have all the different connections and cults brought together by the protagonist. He thinks group A is a cult, then group B, then group C, etc. That way it doesn't depend solely on the reader. But it would have to build up to something. Maybe there is an actual cult gaslighting him?

The text sources are available within the graph ... the graph you said you debunked.

Get some coffee, Moshe, I know hasbara HQs keeps it stocked.

Text excerpts I mean. It is just excepted that the reader will dig up documents from 80 years ago to double-check the numbers. You know exactly what kind of trickery you are up to. I think you're the Jewish one, honestly. The only kind of person who would be so underhanded. You're sowing antisemitism for a certain purpose...

Alright, let's run this one up the flagpole and see if anyone salutes it:

The year is 2076: the story follows the last human alive, he is orbiting the earth in a massive bio-preservation satellite, all humans have been wiped out by nuclear war which put earth into a new ice age. The man is functionally immortal, since he can put himself into hibernation that stops all aging, and the space station is self-powered and will never run out of food, air, or water (because of the plants)
The narrative follows the man as he attempts to breed a race of parrots intelligent as people so he can have someone to talk to. It's a complicated process, as he has to devise tests to determine intelligence and conversational ability, and he has to spend long times in hibernation so his plan comes to fruition: it will take thousands of years for a parrot to ascend to the same level as a person, although it is much easier in space since they don't need to sacrifice brain size for flying ability. Over this long process, he often reflects on the ultimate fate of the universe, the demise of humanity, and his own life and history.
Anyways, he is eventually successful, and creates a breed of parrot that is as intelligent as a person, or maybe even a bit smarter. It's a bit of a bittersweet ending though, because he or the parrots will never be able to return to earth, and they will all eventually die, just as the stars will eventually wink out of existence a trillion years from now.
Thoughts?

Face it. You got caught lying, and caught lying bad. You should feel embarrassed lying about debunking sources you didn't even realize were in the graphic, then demanding I go find them for you.

That's epicfail.jpg territory. I'm taking it easy on you.

You could do some interesting things with that. Have you considered tying in the protagonist's personal history with the cult's activities involving him? That way, you can tie up things nicely by revealing that towards the end, so we understand that we've not been following a passive bystander in the wrong place at the wrong time, but someone who, in some capacity, has a stake in all this?

That's true, but I would still want some unknowing involved. I was thinking it would be kind of a good story, because a lot of people think that their's some kind of conspiracy going on (kek at the Jew and Nazi anons), and I the point is to draw on this belief people have, and build fear from that.

I clearly did realize they were in the graphic because I explicitly mentioned sources in my first reply. Like I said, I meant excerpts. There aren't even page references in the listed sources, that's how badly referenced it is. The point is to give the appearance of knowledge but making it so hard to actually double-check the evidence to verify it so it can be used as an image to shut down conversation, as you had done earlier in the thread (quite literally too -- you told someone to stop talking while posting such a meaningless graph). I was illustrating that point -- you wouldn't have known if I had debunked them or not (since you were waiting on counter-evidence) because you were simply posting a graph you hadn't actually verified yourself. You are the joke here.

That could be really interesting, especially if some of the parrots didn't turn out quite right, like a parrot that was really depressed, or aggressive. I think if you added a lot of psychology to this story it could come out really interesting.

>There aren't even page references in the listed sources
Then how did you debunk it before?

There comes a point when you have to stop digging. You were caught lying and have presented no evidence showing anything in the graph is incorrect.

Bolshevism was a jewish movement and jews slaughtered millions of people under its reign. This is a fact, and the ancestors of those murderers are now residing in the west. Jews are not innocent people, they are a tribe of genocidal nomads.

Eh, I guess it could make an interesting indie movie in a similar vein as Moon. Not really hyped for it though, sorry.

>Then how did you debunk it before?

Like I said, I was illustrating a point. I was bluffing in order to call out your bluff, which I did successfully. Unless that is you want to admit to being such an idiot you believed the graph was indisputable proof or even relevant to the comment to which you initially replied.

>You were caught lying and have presented no evidence showing anything in the graph is incorrect.

Of course not which is the point of the graph -- as I said, to give the appearance of knowledge but expect people to read multiple books in order to discredit the graph. Isn't that why you posted it? To shut conversation down, rather than to reveal a truth?

>Bolshevism was a jewish movement and jews slaughtered millions of people under its reign.

Up until 1937, which wasn't the end of Communism in Russia. The graph is incomplete in proving your point unless you want to provide numbers from beyond that date.

Thanks for the recommendation, I will check it out

Yeah that would be interesting, maybe he wakes up from hibernation one day and all the parrots are sort of insane. He is alarmed, but he also wonders what he should do, how much does he want to play god in their evolution?

>I was bluffing
You were lying.

And I find it remarkable that you would expect to have anything you say afterward taken seriously.

Good luck becoming a better human being, I have a feeling it will be an uphill battle for you.

Wasn't really meant as a recommendation, but sure, go ahead. I really like the movie myself. And talk about a small cast. There are, like, six actors in that movie.

I lied to expose a lie, sure.

But yes I'd probably leave if I were you too.

You people are such spergs it's unbelievable