ITT: post a picture of a writer/philosopher and someone who has put in the hard work to understand their writings will summarize it in 4 sentences or less
the purpose of this thread is so that we can learn about writers without having read them so that it will be easier to pretend to have read them IRL when trying to impress hot girls and what not
i'll start
4 sentences? more like 4 words
>desire
>ontology
>control
>difference
yw
bump
...
>there is no division between Reason and God
>Logic is necessary to contemplate the Infinite
>Theough Reason man goes beyond the actual to the potential
>Plato was right
F-
...
...
Is that what he's saying? Why didn't he just sat that instead of all that gibberish?
"I never said any of that bullshit." -- Hegel
extremely gross fingernails, i had no idea...
...
1. The world is everything that is the case.*
2. What is the case, the fact, is the existence of atomic facts.
3.The logical picture of the facts is the thought.
4. The thought is the significant proposition.
freedom is hell
the others are hell
you consstitute yoursel through the view of the other
you are what you choose
I love this picture lol every time
"I love to suck dick" -
Oh christ, i didnt notice them until just now, what the fuck
what. the. fuck.
i guess he's a trying to show he's a bourgeois type of mother fucker who doesn't have to work so his nails can grow long like a woman's, well i say "grody"
...
>Men have a finite number of possible interactions whith their environment.
>The exhaustive list of these interactions is called a structure.
>Parenthood, myths and language (and anthropology overall) can be described as structures.
>Meaning is "imposer une forme à un contenu"
Wrong Strauss lmao
Actually read my shit and don't be a faggy nihilist.
How about one sentence
>provocatively saying one thing and then contradicting yourself in the next book
i'm a babby reader of deleuze so can someone more well read comment on my understanding?
deleuze:
priority of difference over identity - philosophy must give up trying to pin down identities in the world. trying to fix and make concepts the same. by imposing the sameness and thinking in terms of sameness we paper over the true nature of the world as a becoming, a multiplicity of differences. an example is an organising state which tries to impose sameness on its people (through law, education, language etc.)
joy - from nietzsche. life is joyful, playful, ironic. this is because of difference
body without organs - think of an egg as a body without organs with stem cells specialising themselves as the heart, eyes, anus, mouth etc. desire is productive. desire produces an organisation of the social body. this organisation limits potential becomings. each society has a way of doing this organisation. . for the capitalist, capital is the bwo. the capitalist instructs how the bwo is formed into a social body. however it is the labour of the worker who creates this capital through its productivity
ride the waves - we cannot 'topple' capitalism like the old communists thought would happen, instead we must learn to live within and against it by forming assemblages, 'war machines', concepts - collectives and spaces of resistance that are 'nomadic' - i.e. not rooted in a (metaphorical, geographical) place, to be the opposite of the identity-imposing organisational state mentioned before. the accelerationist post deleuzeans take up the baton here
what does hegel mean by logic?
...
Foucalt:
we all controlled by power-knowledge held by institutions such as church or goverment
its called biopolitics and it fucks us up bad
Pleb, the post
no his name dril
He actually explains this somewhere, he has super sensitive skin on his fingers or whatever and having things touch them caused him physical pain so he just let his nails grow to kinda protect his sensitive smart boy tips
slave labour isn't THAT bad
The world is everything that is the case.
Everything that is the case has been the case from the very start, it can all be derived from the core of things, that which they all share and could share, the elementary propositions.
To derive everything that is the case from the core, one must first properly establish the core.
If you define your elementary propositions wrongly, wrongly establish the core, you can not correctly derive everything that is the case, and can not talk about that which you can not derive, due to your faulty base.
He provocatively says one thing, then contradicts a major aspect of it, but not all of it. That which he doesn't contradict, the left over side effects, are that which he truly wants to share. He does it in a roundabout way because it's the only way.
...
I like the honesty in this post
Of course there are about 1 or two layers of irony, but the sincerity prevails
Good job
Binary = arbitrary
>Red Ass is the best
>actually Jack Nicholson
>being wise is good
>basically socrates of our times
the richard dawkins of his time.
I fucking love dril
nick land
skynet is real, but john connor isn't
Aristotle
enough easymode continentals, try this one on
>"Language is poopoo"
...
Language is use.
Jus be yourself.
Please end my suffering.
samefag