Why do lazy people hate hard working people and the system that rewards hard working people?

why do lazy people hate hard working people and the system that rewards hard working people?

Because systems that reward hard working people don't reward lazy people. Are you retarded or something?

then why people support socialism in america?

how do we get rid of commies?

Because lazy people post frogs on the internet and not even on the right board!

>hard-working people
Keep shilling that meme.

They don't, laziness and strong feelings like hate don't go together.

>aptitude is irrelevant
>networking is everything
>even actual work consists of just hanging out half the time
>hard working people
>>hard working people
>>>hard working people

What a lazy thread

because "hard working people" is a fucking meme shilled by the rich to avoid actually paying people who work 2 jobs enough money to survive.

instate a decent minimum wage before you start bitching about socialism, you fucking cuck

what book is this about?

Friendly reminder that raising the minimum wage will hurt the poor more than help them

because hard-work doesn't always lead to success. see: 16-year old hong kong girls working 13 hour days for the equivalent of 50 dollars a month

Unless it is indexed with the cost of living. Anyway yeah it isn't a solution. The problem is systemic.
>Hey poor people more money is the solution to your problems!
Everytime

This.

The Hard work = success narrative is a simplistic one for children.

Those sweatshop workers are immigrants from the countryside and are very happy with their wages and working conditions. They would be starving subsistence farmers without their jobs.

>Implying a single factor determines success.

Hahahhahaha you are stupid. Subsistence farming does not equal starvation. What a fucking stupid view of the livelihood by which most human beings survived for long, long periods of human history. Subsistence farming and hunting with some barter and mutual aid thrown in is a human economy. You're assuming that sweatshop capitalism is the natural order of things.

>Those fucking serfs love their meager existence making Nikes for foreigners! Why, they should be grateful that we even give them these opportunities for gainful employment in the first place!

>the system that rewards hard working people

And which one would that be? Also not literature.

you're right- in fact, cut their wages. I'm sure being homeless and not having enough food builds character. Fuck you. Give them the means to survive and THEN work on the systemic issues that cause poverty. That's not their fault.

Everyone deserves enough money for shelter, food, clothes/toiletries and transportation without exception. Nobody is talking about the Ritz and caviar here, we're talking about basic human rights. There is NEVER going to be a decent, non-bullshit argument against that.

If subsistence farming were superior then surely the sweatshop workers would move back to the countryside and farm rice again, right? Or do you think that sweatshop workers don't have rational minds?

They deserve the right to work for those things. And if you seriously think anyone in the US is deprived of basic necessities (who isn't a lunatic homeless guy), think again.

This isn't literature. Are you mentally disabled?

I got rich so that I could work less

Why should the basic necessities cost money again? I'm not against better wages but to me they have to be tied to greater organization of labor, the cost of living and greater political agency. If we raised the minimum wage what do you think would happen? Personally I think it would only serve to thrust people in the 15-20/hour range (i.e. Still below a living wage) into greater poverty. The 15/hr thing would ultimately just increase the scope of need rather than reducing it. Anti-capitalism's biggest enemy is liberalism.