Is this the greatest essential reading list of all time?

Why are you Veeky Forums fags pro-communism?
Are you really educated despite dozens of examples of this doctrine not working, or are you psuedo-intellectuals that theorize out of your asses?

We're just anti-twitternigger, go back there, retard.

Marx isn't that bad all things considered. He prevented himself from ever having a legacy by starving his own children. Then the people retarded enough to follow his low-IQ philosophy all starved too. While making all that good shit happen was surely unintentional, because Marx was unironically dumb enough to think he knew anything about government or economics; his ideas killed off a lot of worthless people, and will continue to do so in the future - when the day of the rope comes.

Nice ad-hominem

Nice small penis

Sounds gay

Nice negritude my coloured friend

I'm white

...

Communists are not white.

I'm not a communist, what?

nice false flag rosenberg

jesus christ you nigger, stop whining

Literally who in the bottom right?

monsieur lacan

op do you read badiou

>op do you read badiou

I have not no but Zizek mentions him often

you'll like him, he loves lacan and plato, marx obv
>also mao

the badioupill is very strong

check him out. don't start with B&E, read his other stuff first

Gracias Girardfag

Had Marx not organized socialist/communist movements behind his ideas of scientific socialism, dialectical materialism, historical materialism, etc., it's likely the communist and socialist groups of the time would've followed a far worse version of communism/socialism.

It's not as if Marx introduced the concept of communism. Had he never existed, there would've been Blanqui, Proudhon, Striner, and Bakunin, who would've led the theoretical front through Anarchism and revolutionary socialism.

Marx didn't cause communism to happen anymore than Martin Luther King Jr. didn't himself cause the Civil Rights Movement to happen. Both were powerful voices in their fields but they were movements. Millions of people were involved. Marx himself mattered very little except to academics and intellectuals, and as a man that socialist workers could point to as the source of their ideas.

that's lacan? nigga looked mad different

best stack is:
>stirner
>nietzsche
>lacan
>deleuze

>kids table

I don't understand. You've only given me two options, one being "yes" and the other being embellished with an exclamation point. However I would rather choose some variety of "no". You've really put my back against the wall here.

Look, the sort of views you apparently have? Stop having them, and stop posting them. Just generally make yourself and your retardation go away.

I've found Badiou's criticisms of other philosophers to be at times well crafted ad hominems such as criticising Wittgenstein's tractatus by somehow incorporating his struggles with his homosexuality into it.

Plato
Aristotle
Xenophon
Hobbes
Rousseau
Hegel
Nietzsche
Carl Schmitt
Leo Strauss.

Who are you?
Zizek?

Zizek would have Lenin up there.

marxism is a cirtique of capitalism. not to be confused with stalinism, which was a murderous era of the soviet union

i seriously don't see what people see in Marx's writtings. He really didn't write anything except for "i am angery because i am poor so let's all kick rich people in the face"

Marx wasn't really poor though.

The whole thing from beginning to end was murderous.

His children died from the poor condition they were forced to live in. His wife wished he'd get a job(much like the parents of Marx advocates)