What's the most important thing you've learned about women through reading?

What's the most important thing you've learned about women through reading?

They seem sensitive about being punched

1. Do not trust a woman's tears in matters of love or property. (Dostoyevsky).

2. Pledge yourself only to the noblest and most perfect of women. (Cervantes).

3. To consider lust a man's game is to leave yourself unguarded to wiles and trickery. (Nabokov).

I don't get the last one

That they can't write and aren't really worth writing about.

That having sex with men is just better

Men generally assume that being a "player" is something unique to males. Women can be just as manipulative and deceptive when it comes to attracting mates. And in some cases even more so. Assuming that women are incapable of deception and manipulation is very much leaving yourself unguarded.

The male body is fucking gross.

Joyce taught me that you should try to find a woman who's into the same perverted fetishes you're into. Or at least one that will tolerate them and indulge you on them some. More through his life than through his works, admittedly.

it's pretty erotic tbqh

If you're a faggot yeah maybe.

>hairy
>smelly
>rigid, not soft on the touch
>square looking
It's disgusting, I don't get how women do it.

They're as faithful as their options. They live in an emotional and subjective landscape that allows them to view the world as they think it should be, rather than how it actually is. They live for sentiment and sensuality, rather than achievement. They relate more closely to the animal aspect of human nature than men do. They justify their problems as opposed to viewing them objectively. They are emotionally much more sophisticated than men are. They have as much power as men do.

>They are emotionally much more sophisticated than men are.

Could you elaborate on this?

Female sexuality is less about visual indicators of fertility than about indicators of power and domination. Gay men and straight women want to feel safe and possessed, like children.

And from what kind of reddit book have you 'learned' this from?

From a scientific perspective women tend to be closer to the empathizing side of the empathizing-systemizing spectrum. They understand very subtle emotional cues, and the language part of their brain is physically larger than their male counterparts. Women probably evolved this to be able to compete with the more physically dominant men.

>The male body is fucking gross.
Yeah sure thing pal.

Compare to the female form (in something like Venus of Urbino, e.g.), which is a fatty, undefined mess.

The problem is that men who look like that are rare. All a woman has to do to be attractive is be young and under 140 pounds. But a man has to work out daily in order to be attractive.

>All a woman has to do to be attractive is be young and under 140 pounds.
lol no

This woman, for example is young and under 140 pounds, which means bone-thin arms, flat body and no hips at all. Her body is disgusting.

99% of straight men would fuck her. She has a pretty face and can carry your seed, which is enough. Most men can't compete with that:

>Women probably evolved this to be able to compete with the more physically dominant men.
That trait doesn't even lend itself to competition, and the idea that members of the same communal species but of opposite sexes are 'competing' is mongoloid 3rd wave horseshit

>99% of straight men would fuck her
Shifting goalposts. Men fuck unattractive things all the time due to a wide variety of factors including biological hardwiring, social and cultural cues, psychological states and etc.
That user's sample is still unaesthetic, and is decently representative of what genetically 'average' women look like if they try to conform to modern beauty standards

>99% of straight men would fuck her.

What's your point? Most people would eat a hot dog. Does that mean hot dogs are aesthetically pleasing to the higher senses?

Women are actually more practical than men.
There is an incredibly thin line between and 'innocent' girl and a smartened/sexually aware one.
Women are easy to influence but hard to govern.
All woman innately know to play the courtship game.
Woman are half of reality and essential to understanding and subverting the notions of the male self. Unironic misogyny is a mistake.

Sexually dimorphic features evolve in relation to one another, which is what I mean by competition. Women evolved a greater sensitivity to emotional cues in order to have some degree of autonomy in the selection process when men are stronger than they are. And women and men do compete with one another when it comes to selection arbitration. You see this happening right now with feminism concerning itself with maximum selection freedom.

She's still much better than a statistically average man.

>catwalk model is better than the average
wow

I'd hit it.

The ones with higher testosterone, like Virginia Woolf, are nearly capable of reasoning. Quite scary.

Read Lolita.

Fickle, capricious, slaves to feelings and whim, self-destructive, prone to narcissism especially if physically attractive, pitiful in that they do themselves a disservice and stunt growth by caring to much about the collective, vanity, appearances and relying to much the state in turn making them boring tedious people. That they're bad leaders because they're vindictive, vengeful, petty due to reasons stated above, and lastly destroyer of nations and progress if not stopped. Remember, men are the movers and our motivation is to amuse women. They're the cat who knocks down your stack of cards with indifference.

Women are essentially children who want to be disciplined and are more prone to corruption. The more I think about the snake tempting eve, the more apt it that allegory is.

They are dumb sluts who cannot write.

That you should never apologize to a woman (dostoievsky)

That woman is the root of all evil.

Women are inferior to men