What's Veeky Forums's problem with right wing literature?

What's Veeky Forums's problem with right wing literature?

/pol/ kiddies hijacking every thread to
>muh jews
while clearly trolling instead of actually having discussions about them

We mostly read dead white men that wouldn't even be on a modern political chart.

fuck off reddit

Most right wing authors don't talk about Jews. Why do you guys brush off excellent authors like T.S. Elliot just because of his political views?

>considering things written after 1950
>right wing
fuck off you illiterate scum.

Because intellectually dishonest people like yourself intentionally misread posts, like you just did, and make it about your boring race wars.

You brought up Jews, autist. I think you are hallucinating.

Is this damage control from the previous thread where you got completely rekt? () Rhetorical question.

Eliot's shit. We don't brush of Pound for his more extreme political views, even though HD did and she's a far better writer than either of the aforementioned. Half the board are futurists also, which is the far more insane originator of a lot of the fascist texts of any value, so if you feel your right wing views are being brushed off it's probably because they're all leftists in love with mechanical progress and the death of the human race and that just sells more books than calling something The Wasteland about avoiding STDs and proper swordsmanship.

Envy and jealously mostly, right-wing individuals have produced most of the best works of art throughout history, entire fields of study are built on their shoulders.

10 / 0/ 6 /1
6 posters. 6 posts disagreeing with OP.
(You)
(You)
(You)

Stop embarrassing yourself and enable "Mark New IPs" already.

I'm one of those, so he's added the (You) manually. I'm only exposing him because he deserves kudos for that.

This. You're living in fairyland if you aren't aware that most leftist ideas are modern fabrications and that the people who've bought into them are pseudo avant garde stooges.

If is well written, none. But seeing it isent well written and just panders about stupid shit, them fuck it. Bad literature is bad, not because is right-wingy.

This.

>HD did and she's a far better writer than either of the aforementioned
*breathes in*
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHHAHAH

Like other anons already said: go back to /pol/

we have threads fairly often but you wouldn't know because you don't read right-wing literature and so wouldn't notice if its balls smacked you on the chin

Pound thought she was better too. You're demonstrating your lack of taste, loudly.

Because right wingers can't write for shit.

Yeah, like he would go all-out proclaiming himself better than one of his favorite writers even if it was evident. that wouldn't be a dick move at all

so, where did you get this yeah from? some revisionist dyke lit professor?

Because the Right-Wing literature you like is shit.
Read more de Maistre and Schmitt and less Camp of Saints garbage tier lit.

This. It's not that we're opposed to right-wing literature as such, it's just that most of the right-wing writers and thinkers /pol/ wants to discuss are fucking talentless morons. I mean, Stefan Molyneux? Really?

He dont want to read, he and his cronies only want to hijack threads so it be all "muh jews".
/pol/tards need to killthemselfs.

>right-wing individuals have produced most of the best works of art throughout history
t. /pol/ brainlet

but user, pic related is the current most discussed book on Veeky Forums

Go on

Looks like hasbara has hired a few extra goons to sway the story on Veeky Forums. Sad what this place is becoming with these jewish shills trying to blame /pol/ for everything. This is a European literature board, of course most of the best read people here are going to edge right wing to redpilled.

the jidf shills wouldn't waste their time here if that one anti-semitic crank didn't spam the board to death with his bullshit

we don't