Is Raymundo Costa, the Mexican blogging sophist, the voice of our generation?

Is Raymundo Costa, the Mexican blogging sophist, the voice of our generation?

Other urls found in this thread:

undergroundbooks.org/the-kitchen-poet/ronald-mcdonald-rei-koz
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Apology but that is Rei Koizumi, the great sage of Japan.

He looks like he spends all his free time in Tlapan.

?

lmao
dumb gringo

Provinciano de rancho bicicletero detected.

What a strange face

You mean Ry Quss, the Iranian scholar, right?

Is it an ignorant, feeble yet restless, unstoppable yap of half-understood ideas written by a self-important neet who never in their life took an interest in improving their 7th-grade-tier writing? Then yes, he's the voice of our generation.

Selfhating Millennial, or bitter Genexer (or Boomer) detected.

People like you are toxic and pathetic. If Millennials are so bad and degenerate why do people like you set out to systematically undermine them over the media, and in casual conversation?

This is pretty duh spot on. Plus look at that most Semitic of noses. I wouldn't trust a word this kid said, even if it weren't all obscuritanist esotericism wavering between pedestrian and incomprehensible.

Nah, you're just either dumb, or intentionally being an idiot.

How about you fuck off either way?

What I would give to kidnap a Ray Quoss and make his life a living hell. I would force him to dress up in elf and leprechaun outfits and subject him to pure awfulness and humiliation. just terrible degradation and shameful acts. it would be so easy to break his spirit and drive him to suicide, but I wouldn't let him do it. if I could train a dog to rape on command then I would totally do that as well. a really big dog like a mastiff. he would be so completely and utterly powerless to stop it, not to mention terrified. a big ass dog is even scary and life-threatening to a normal human but to a midget like Ray? might as well be a dragon. I'd keep him in a cell and what's more is that I would actually place to key inside with him but put it in a high place. not extremely high but just ever so slightly out of reach. it would drive him mad. I would dress him like a baby and force feed him 99 cent store baby food. I'd also pick him up like a child and toss him from one corner to the next. I'd grab him by one leg and swing him as hard and as fast as I could then hurl him to see how far he goes. I'd rent one of those giant inflatable bounce houses and body slam him all day until my arms ached. Just so many things I would do.

Dumb and idiot, eh? What a rich and descriptive vocabulary you have. I'll definitely trust your opinion on which writers are meritorious and which are not.

This gave me a boner

>am ray

He's kind of right. If you're having trouble parsing work as lightly esoteric as his - to the point where you deem it "incomprehensible" - then you're simply not that bright.

is anyone going to give a link to the blog or not? Reverse image does nothing and the name gives no results.

The site is mundusmillennialis.com friendo

cheers

Why are you shilling for your own blog ray

.

I'm not REI. You can skip all of his stuff and miss out on absolutely nothing. Don't go getting all defensive now.

Rei Koz is an utter genius. I've spent hours reading his work. Even his posts are fascinating.

That's the thing really. Even if you lack the understanding and/or mental acumen to grasp what he writes about, even an idiot cannot deny that his style is central to his character. He's completely original. He is genius in the same vein as Icycalm. Both are our generation's greatest thinkers -- not including those who we have yet to discover. You're all quite literally, too fucking stupid to realize this.

>He is genius in the same vein as Icycalm.

You had me going for a sec.

Typical non-contribution. Have some substance apart from the memeshit endemic to the idiots that predominate this site. Post a fucking aphorism and we'll discuss it. Or explain why you don't think this guy is brilliant. Anything is better than that.

I literally pretend post as him (JUST LIKE THIS) on other boards, I've been doing this for months, I reply to a random thread with some literal fabricated bullshit (the more racialist the better) that vaguely sounds like he said it and everyone automatically goes insane, no matter what I write. No one has ever suspected I'm not the real Ray either. So it could be this :

1. His work is indistinguishable from bullshit, he is a walking talking meme, and doesn't say anything meaningful if it is effortless to emulate him.

2. No one actually understands what he's talking about in the first place and they just get angry at him because he types in caps.

3. He's a troll.

>Post a fucking aphorism and we'll discuss it.

Okay.

"GO! SONICHU! GO OUT AND ZAP TO THE EXTREME!" - Francois de La Rochefoucauld

>1. His work is indistinguishable from bullshit, he is a walking talking meme, and doesn't say anything meaningful if it is effortless to emulate him.

The fact that people automatically recognize his style of writing says more about his notoriety.The fact that people can scarcely parse what the fuck he writes says more about the stupidity of the majority. They confuse the appearance of his aesthetic -- (which is genius, because all he ever did was revert to the latin-roman stylized script) -- with the ideas he presents, which again, bears witness to their blithering stupidity.

>2. No one actually understands what he's talking about in the first place and they just get angry at him because he types in caps.

Basically.

>3. He's a troll.

Nah.

Not him but I'll bite.

Why don't you articulate a way in which reading Rei has personally improved your life. That's generally something a philosopher's work should do.

He's original in that he had the guts to do the idea everyone else thought was too stupid and shallow.

He's a troll that probably wonders how what he writes isn't legitimate and thus somewhat believes it, since current society tends to allow that sort of thing these days. He's rewarded with viral marketing by sustaining this project at length which is a sign of genius to unread millennials

Identity, which ultimately translates into a clearer conception of purpose. Affirmation of faith in God.

People without gnosis, or a remembrance of their childhood innocence, or faith, or a knowledge of esotericism read his stuff and don't know what to think. They're dumbfounded.

>(which is genius, because all he ever did was revert to the latin-roman stylized script) -- with the ideas he presents, which again, bears witness to their blithering stupidity.

I'll concede that he has a real understanding of script/syntactic treatment and how form correlates to content (of which he is abnormally insightful compared to most of his contemporaries, as opposed to outright genius - you throw that title around far too liberally) but all he's doing is putting forward extremely watered-down treatments of Perennial wisdom. Anyone who reads this stuff seriously would look at his work with a shrug. There's no doubting that he is far smarter than a lot of posters his age, and I find his championing of the autist to be charming, but apart from that... eh.

What did he mean by this? It really makes me think...

His name is actually Kevin Munoz, if anyone is interested.

>Identity

Nothing in his work indicates implied, or explicit, support of or promotion of "identity". In fact, what I've seen of his posts/aphorisms, he seems to be anti-identity, instead promoting the concept of "person"/"personality".

I don't know how anyone can read Kant and then think this is good philosophy.

>but all he's doing is putting forward extremely watered-down treatments of Perennial wisdom

Even if that were true, the Sophia Perennis is never "watered down". How much an individual gleans from it is directly proportional with how much a person is able to glean. The truth, like love, is self-ordering and optimizes all that come in contact with it.

Can it be perverted, maimed, and displaced entirely by wicked people? Yes.

Go to bed, Kevin.

>Kant
>Good philosophy
>Not the hyperrational sophistry of a physically, and spiritually, crippled man.
>Implying that a physical and spiritual cripple is capable of sound philosophy.

Ok, buddie-O

Some nice use of Kantian philosophy there.

Anyone got a link to his diary extract of working in McDonalds?

What board? I'm a long-time reader of Kevin and would immediately detect if it wasn't his writing. I can also understand what he's talking about, but it's true that most don't put in the effort.

undergroundbooks.org/the-kitchen-poet/ronald-mcdonald-rei-koz

>using me as a soapbox now

Kek. I know, user. Thank you.

He's just a young man and his writing still largely reflects this. Calm down. He has prescience and vision, but I'm not going to sing his praises when the writing still leaves much to be desired. He has some sight to him, though. All shitposting aside I do wish him luck. He is one of the rare ones.

DO YOU EVER WONDER WHY?

DO YOU EVER SEE IN YOUR DREAMS

ALL THE CASTLES IN THE SKY?

attraction is borne by hate. blind to ultimate purpose, it clumps itself onto what it is attracted to. this is someone reaching out and grabbing by the wrist

union is borne by love. galvanized by higher purpose, it harmonizes with what aligns with it. this is the melding of fingers, palm to palm, in the clasp of hands being held.

it's pretty self explanatory

... And who the fuck are you?

I hate when decrepit old people condescendingly dismiss younger people by redundantly saying that they're young/still young, as if youth were something bad, while justifying their own growing senility and bitterness lmfao

This is beautiful

You're seriously being antagonistic to me because I'm not acting like a total sycophant for this guy? Are you serious?

>condescendingly dismiss younger people

Read my post again and try to put your angst aside this time and you'll see that I spoke highly of him multiple times.

>as if youth were something bad

Show me where I said that. Go on.

I didn't know he was mexican. I finally understood why he is such a retard. "White" mestizos are the worst kind of third worlder. they all larp as [european country]-[actual country] retards because their great grandmother fucked a european.

I think he means from the mundane race has its genesis, otherwise race would be from some other realm and thus not the genesis of the mundane. Also I have no idea why, say, metalworking isn't a synthesis of crafts, arts, and sciences.

Hello.
is not the user that wrote We all have more to learn, myself included. So to respond to your earlier post; I believe that is a fair perspective. But still, Rei's work is virtually unique. So in that, he has my ardent support. This'll be my last post in this thread. Peace out

You imply that youth is some "bad phase" that eventually everyone overcomes, reaching the vast wisdom of old age.

>is not the user that wrote ...

I mean to link my earlier post, which was Toodles

>FROM RACE, EVERYTHING MUNDANE HAS ITS GENESIS

>I think he means from the mundane race has its genesis

...

Otherwise it doesn't make sense. Finish the post.

You're projecting all of this onto me. I don't think myself better than younger people and I don't resent youth in general. You are projecting.

How doesn't it make sense? He's saying that all that happens in the world is rooted in race.
Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean "it doesn't make sense".

I explained it in the rest of the post that you didn't read. Race doesn't cause earthquakes.

An earthquake isn't something mundane (of the world), but something natural.

Earth =/= The world
The natural =/= The mundane

What is race rooted in then if not nature?

Race isn't natural, otherwise animals, plants, and humans would automatically tend to race, but they don't, they rather tend to speciation, and ethnicity.

Race is rooted in the ideal, or spiritual, not in the natural/physical.

>Race is rooted in the ideal

No matter what, the ideal is communicated through material vestiges, so the genesis of race is in the mundane rather than the opposite. Race is an 'accumulated knowledge' and 'custom', i.e. the arts, crafts, and sciences which are all taught and learned. Architecture is the highest development of this and it lasts the longest.

On the point of architecture, either the customs (etc.) become lost or architecture does not represent those customs/spirit. Architecture isn't lost, and it is corruptible -- either by the loss of customs that explain it (leaving it a 'corpse') or by the natural processes of ruination (therefor becoming difficult to 'read').

Also is architecture not improvement on the world or making it beautiful? Is he saying the customs and knowledge are the foundations? So he says that the foundations are lost and we retain castles in the sky. Silent, incorruptible, ruined corpses.

sigh
You don't understand any of the terms you're using...

Not very convincing. I'm reading the quote for what it actually says.

Yeah it is he articulates what all autists feel deep inside. I've never worked before but I know I would react the same way.

But you don't understand you read.

*what you read

He's American just lives in Mexico. And he's not a mestizo at all, in a picture with better lighting you can tell that his skin is very white. He's actually 1/8 japanese

Still not convincing. I don't think Rei understood what he typed considering how mixed his approach to architecture is. Is it silent or is it expressive of a race's ethos? Is it an incorruptible testament or is it a ruined corpse?
Are people passing through the world i.e. the mundane or are they generating it?

hes mestizo

and no, rei is not the voice of our generation, and anyone who wastes that much time on Veeky Forums making posts like "what do you mean by 'is this Veeky Forums'" and "national socialism and fascism are two different things" is a fucking loser

Do you consider Castilians to be mestizo?

fuck off, rei

youre a loser