Hey Veeky Forums I want to educate myself on government and politics

Law 101: Everything You Need to Know About American Paw

/pol/ stuff obviously, but all the books on this list are usually recommended by Veeky Forums anyway.

Part 2, just for completion.

>uggh, politics is so complicated, it makes no sense
>maybe everything is just the jews fault
>ah, now everything is clear to me! it was so simple all along

Read marx. Don't listen to what anyone tells you about marx, sit down and actually read marx. Then read the actual history of the ussr, because most of what you've been told is utter historical revisionism.

World history atm is in the monopoly capitalism stage. Unlike what most people/school/whatever will have you believe, neoliberalism is an ideology that prevailed when the bourgeoisie toppled feudalism through armed revolution. it followed a retrogressive course, with the first liberal state lasting merely for a few years (great revolution, uk). Marx will give you a good grasp of political economy and historical materialism. Two crucial things are for you to be able to exercise dialectical thought and critique, and also understand how materialism evolved from idealism.

Now if you really want to read what will basically go down in history as world changing in a few years, read vaziulin. for that though, you must know greek, german or russian. If you know greek, you can even go further and read Dimitris Patelis' books that are to be published in a year or 2.

Western political systems work for jewish interests. Once you understand how that works ... the billions in aid, middle east wars, the global organizations, central banking dollar based empire, and so many other things that never seem to act in white people's interests are continually allowed to occur in our name.

>t. retard

>Jews control everything and kept me from getting a job with my shitty B.A.
>Ignore the centuries of direct control over world trade and governance by protestant anglos, germans and dutchmen, it's literally muh jewish conspiracy

probably blames the joos for his virginity too

this is what happens when your political opinion is based on feels>reals mentality, combined with lack of historical knowledge

Look at these jews trying to deflect attention away from their tribe, who have to green text to hide their inability to make real arguments. Pathetic as it gets.

ye except i'm not jewish. thanks for proving my point

I'm 100% celtic you yankee mutt.

Any supporting studies you've already made, for a specialty shoe-in to quicker introductory understanding?

My own choice.

All research will always be incomplete. Seems quite comprehensive though for the western tradition.

cambridge.org/core/series/cambridge-history-of-political-thought/BF22079794ED3C970E32EE0F57E2F74B#

That makes you even more pathetic. If you're white, there's no excuse for you not understanding the jewish problem (and not using proper grammar as well btw); if you're some black/brown mixture, you have a better excuse since you're probably not very smart and understanding the jewish question requires strong intellectual capabilities.

OP if you're interested in being educated on politics visit /pol/
genuinely good information.

or I'm simply someone who actually read history books and didn't get his education from nazi propaganda, artifact ridden /pol/ jpegs and youtubers

>jpegs
>youtube
>nazi

that is the "american educated from the internet" starter pack.

Jpeg artifacts scramble jewish efforts to snoop on his Dell laptop though user.

I'm much better read than you will ever be and have never posted on pol. I'm just telling you how it is, but it's obviously up to you whether you are strong enough in character to explore a subject that frightens you.

why does the nationality matter?

>being well read
>never posted on pol
pick one

>I'm much better read than you will ever be

>believes in conspiracy theories

dunno if this is b8 but its not amusing

cause american education is the shittiest and the american proletariat the most lumpen

No conspiracy, just the way it is. Take the publishing industry for instance.

publishers being jewish doesn't equal secret jewish lobby controlling the world

and ye i was wrong, its not artifact ridden jpegs its artifact ridden pngs

OP: read this right wing book. Then read the left wing book in the reply to this post.

Leftist book aforementioned

>publishers being jewish doesn't equal secret jewish lobby controlling the world

I agree. But I never said it was like that anyway. Jews are tribal people who gain power through ethnic nepotism and do not act meritocracally. Technically that does involve "conspiring" but I know you aren't interested in the actual definition of the term.

the leap from "there is nepotism in the jewish community" to "jooz control the world" is a pretty big one. i am not denying there are jewish people within the ruling class of society, aka the capital owners, but it's not a requirement nor are all jewish people part of it. a jewish worker is as exploited as any worker

Don't get memed into The Republic is the only advice I can give you. It's, like, laughably bad. Read the sparknotes if you really want to, it will save you a lot of time.

No one said "jews control the world," dude. But you are still fundamentally lacking an understanding of the jewish question. That's okay, so did I once. It's a complicated subject but if you are white you owe it to yourself to try to understand it better. Jews have very different interests than white people, and when they are allowed to gain as much power over our institutions as they have, they wield that power in specific ways that more often than not are not beneficial to white people. If you want to look into how this manifests itself read Culture of Critique; it'll give you an entry level understanding.

ye your postmodernist take on history doesn't amuse me. how about you read hegel and marx, then come back to me mr well read

Thanks, you got more?
Not to sound lazy but is there a mega file with those?

hopeless

Postmodernist what? Yeah, I was likely past Marx and Hegel before you'd cleaned out your 8th grade locker. But you aren't ready, I understand and don't fault you for it.

>i was past hegel

you could at least google hegel to get a semblance of how moronic what you just wrote is. you wouldn't understand hegel if someone shoved the phenomenology up your asshole page by page while reciting it you dumb cunt

...

Wisdom and reason are lost on poor saps on you. You aren't near my level, kid, but if you want to pretend like you could one day arrive within reach, at least use proper grammar so you can feign being of age while babbling like a fool instead of babbling like a fool and coming off like a fucking 14 year old pussy.

Regardless of what country you're from, I'd say start with the Federalist papers and the Anti-federalist papers.

Federalist:
let.rug.nl/usa/documents/1786-1800/the-federalist-papers/the-federalist-1.php

Anti-federalist:
thefederalistpapers.org/anti-federalist-papers

These will allow you to understand the pragmatism of how modern governments, specifically liberal republics, are constructed, and why they're constructed in this such way.

These are a good starting point because they are readily understandable where fundamental political texts like Leviathan aren't as salient anymore.

Once you read these, then go back to the Greeks starting with Plato's Apology, to understand why democracy is fucking tyrannical, and then to England.

In the end of your studies you should understand that every possible permutation of distribution of powers will fail to safeguard the individual dignity and sanctity of the human person thus the state must be full decentralized to the point of abolition.

mega.nz/#F!B4dB2SzQ!h_pMC30v2a_y31iD0dy0sg (/pol/ stuff I)

mega.nz/#F!0F5GXTjS!oGdz8UP5JbcleNMy6YKLvg (/pol/ stuff II)

mega.nz/#F!cZoSEbpC!kdnYuLw3hvYSus9uZl6PRQ!QNAixJZL (/pol/ stuff III)

mega.nz/#F!4MJE0L6Q!teKAfBlT2m3Ija-Tun-EFw (/pol/ stuff IV)

mega.nz/#F!pYRnSJaC!HrC3Siqyioo9PjdGMNWs3Q (/pol/ stuff V)

mega.nz/#F!LotEVRxT!YE-YrG6SZ54nJqltrYN8Nw (/pol/ stuff VI)

mega.co.nz/#F!scMFjYZY!MKTKFWGVVuA7kV4OMHgkcg (/pol/ stuff VII) (Link is Fucked)

mega.co.nz/#F!fo0TDC4a!Ck2n3wuqWutm3FyLtxZB8A (/pol/ related)

mega.co.nz/#F!UdxSVLJB!bgBwqzuFIV3z0HvCswA0dQ (/pol/ related)

mega.co.nz/#F!eMs1HDRD!LJcwVTJXhhx1a5bUu2l0dg (/pol/ related)

mega.co.nz/#F!6sgETKCa!vGFF5iTfCR6lH3ZLXaQorQ (TGSNT, William Pierce, Icelandic Sagas)

mega.co.nz/#F!zQtglTAY!JZ8y7bZpqPz6od5WmtLfIg (Third Reich films)

mega.co.nz/#F!MQ8ziQKK!rzb0LRaZoyL6te1tguBNnA!RBs1mRhC (Third Reich recordings)

mega.nz/#F!fIchVA7Y!owKwAgGKq9pgXrbVOnkeag!7dEXGAAI (Asatru / Paganism)

pastebin.com/v6qsewmw (/sum/ info)

mega.nz/#F!AE5yjIqB!y7Vdxdb5pbNsi2O3zyq9KQ!8VxzyY7Y (Occult literature I)

mega.nz/#F!RktiXZBS!W_ZvtntvNvWxvsSYZCG_vg (Occult literature II)

mega.nz/#F!6kJzEIJb!aVVgmWAM-aP_bU_8Co43FA (Occult literature III)

mega.co.nz/#F!K8wTjbiZ!mWFZsQRr2SZYC1AsoE6Shw (Occult books, big file size)

mega.nz/#F!sU90kbAR!pXKWaWnZcY8eTIA2wUSDBA (Full Sinister Tarot)

drive.google.com/drive/folders/0BwLJ8mj-ZuoGc0NKUEtoLTBmQXc ("Mesmer's Lair", hypnosis etc.)

mega.co.nz/#F!m00SjRRA!R_I9wzUTEhSN6spP35TyZg (Psychopolitics)

mega.nz/#F!1R0QATqZ!Eb1_M5KC9gkxK6w32R2ETw (Veeky Forums related)

mediafire.com/?i44dwzkf9j9n8 (art)

mega.nz/#F!MQBRHBJA!L_on3h-XUrtbc719UaMygw (philosophy)

mega.co.nz/#F!4FJSUTyL!gRWJW5eBK0ydunfSzDB3xg (/k/)

pastebin.com/JN01tWVF (Languages & Linguistics)

Workerbee on TPB has a ton more too by author, you can also find the public domain versions of some easily on archive.org or gutenberg.

libgen.io is better

Read The Road to Serfdom

I get by just fine with these resources. More than I could ever read in a lifetime. Also look up deepweb book sites like Incorrect Library for more, you can get most of it on the clearweb but they did recently translate Solzhenitsyn's Two Hundred Years Together so there's that.

oh neat, ty for this info

>individual dignity and sanctity
Nice spooks

@9990604
*yawns*
*puts down glass of scotch, double ice*
*turns off mozart (his 5th ensemble, D sharp)*
*removes headphones, sennheiser 6200, leveled phonic textured edition*
*places reading supplies on mahogany side table*
*thinks to self*
ahhh, what a riveting novella... unfortunately I must deal with this wretched dregling... don't worry rukia, my love, I'll return shortly.
*phlegmatically looks down at watch*
*cringes*
*glance eyes at forum member No.9990604 without moving head*
*slowly swivels head off to the side, not particularly looking at anything*
*begins to contemplate aloud*

oh....

it's....... reddit hour.....

well, it can't be helped.... anyways, my blade has been craving to taste blood again....

this won't take long.... kid, you're already dead...

I realize this is ironic shitposting but I haven't seen this much cancer in months and I spend most of my time here on /pol when I'm not on Veeky Forums, /co/, or /x/

>I spend most of my time here on /pol
Jesus, they even think this is /pol/. No wonder.

Sad day when a frequenter of Veeky Forums has no reading comprehension. It is obvious from context that by 'here' I meant Veeky Forums.

Step 1. Disregard Stirner posting.

>The Anarchist FAQ

>dont let /pol/ eat your brain
>become an anarchist instead

>t. Unconscious egoist trying to maintain belief in his spooks in vain

If you wanna ever branch out and look at why people do what they do like why radical Islam and nazism are things, check out The Lucifer Principle

This is a good guide.

disregarded.

>LALALALALALALALALALALALALALA I CAN'T HEAR YOU
good post

I did warn you.

4/10
every line that mentions a material object should be native advertising

...

>Culture of Critique; it'll give you an entry level understanding
If this book is so entry level, why is it being shilled so much? What is the final boss book of the "Jewish question" (SUCH a fucking annoying phrase btw, so well done on your b8 10/10 etc.)

>at least use proper grammar so you can feign being of age
And here we have the unconscious, projected admission. Only children pretend to be like a stereotypical "adult" you fuck.
>I am so smart
>oh pweeeeze use proper gramma on 4hcna I can't poossibwy understand you postings@!

>someone wants to become knowledgeable in politics

>idealogues clamour for a convert.

Unironically OP try to understand the world from a geopolitical resource based perspective. Read prisoners of geography for a nice intro to the theme. Pick an idealogy whenever. Treat people shilling an idealogy as trying to sell you something. Anyone willing to put a concrete label on what they believe and not leave it doesn't have the answer.

Reminder that anarchy is not what the media tell you.
>The Anarchist FAQ
Recommended.

>artifact ridden pngs
png is lossless tho

Disgusting how /pol/ is trying to infiltrate our board.

>you shouldn't have any firm beliefs
>anyone writing from a certain political perspective isn't worth reading

You sound like the perfect victim of neoliberal centrism.
I'll take an honest ideologue any day over someone pretending to be neutral and objective.

No, I have no problem with firm stances. I take a firm stance on every major issue I discuss, none of my views are centrist in any way. What I take issue with is buying a label and a whole set of beliefs hook line and sinker. Attaching names to sets of beliefs is the worst cancer that ever came upon politics.

and moreover someone asks to be informed on political issues, and you fucking disgusting idealogues clamour for a convert like a crowd of unmarried mormons. How about you give him a bit of objective information and let him decide for himself instead of trying to convert him to your side.

>not adding Kropotkin at the same time

>objective information
That's what you don't get, lmao. There is no objectivity in politics, the political spectrum is a clash of differing visions of society which are based on differing philosophical foundations. What would a classical liberal and a Marxist socialist agree when it comes to "objectivity" in politics? Getting informed about politics is done exactly by taking a stance because you're already involved in this game unless you're literally an emotionless robot.

>trying to derive your opinion from analyzing facts instead of a priori believing anything that the people on your political side tell you is "being a centrist" and "not having any firm beliefs"
Karl Marx is rolling in his grave.

People who talk about jews and jewish influence =/= /pol/. This, however, seems like a concept that is too advanced for many idiots to comprehend.

There is objective information and statistics. The information and statistics exist, how you choose to interpret it differs. Here obviously we agree. What I am saying is that nobodys first foray into the realm of politics should be a highly biased fucking anarchist FAQ for example. Take a stance on issues, take a stance on every issue. Don't buy a fucking label. Don't drink the kool aid.

Well alright, if you are saying that one should start by reading economics, and getting informed about various schools of interpreting the workings of the economy, then I would agree. However this approach would already be derided as biased by a traditionalist conservative, for instance.

Well then we're on the same boat. A traditionalist conservative isn't interested in the running of a stable economically viable state, he's only interested in morals, so we should not listen to him on economic issues would be my argument against that. Any traditionalist conservative worth his salt would admit the same.

I know /pol/acks are as easy to trigger as they are to deny who they are.

The Grand Chessboard: American Primacy and Its Geostrategic Imperatives (1997)

Domestic politics is bullshit, if you want to know what's going on you have to understand the international arena.

I'll even make it easy for you.
takeoverworld.info/Grand_Chessboard.pdf

Careful not to fall for /pol/.

Swallow the blue pill user better to be a sheep than a raving lunatic

Read The Dictator's Handbook at some point.

hell yes

...

>Subscription to economist because my Yuropean immigrant father remembered how great it was in the 60s
>not great, but better than fucking Newsweek or w/e, read mostly for good "outside America" news
>gradual decline in quality over the ten years I am subscribed
>at least their shitty opinions are still presented alongside accurate and objective presentations of fact, mostly
>2015 suddenly quality nosedives, notice they are actively misrepresenting and fudging campaign coverage
>literally a step removed from CNN
>subscription runs out in February 2017, don't renew, why pay for shit opinions AND no more objective fact-based coverage?
>months pass, read a few online articles to see them shitting themselves over Trump
>suddenly discover that the Economist "attained" its first ever female editor in 2015

And that is what it took to destroy a publication that lasted for over a century and a half, that survived the potato famine, the Battle for Britain, decolonization, The Troubles, and the Cold War.

Womameme writers, not even once.

...

>Dialectical Materialism
Of all the ideas advanced by Marx, you take the one the easiest to refute and advance do in his earlier writings, later backed away from in Capital, and then you recommend it to OP. I agree that he should read Marx, but read Capital

...