Which one was more correct?

Which one was more correct?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Aristotelicum
books.google.com/books?id=Fv9AKY_DBVYC&pg=PR3&source=gbs_selected_pages&cad=2#v=onepage&q&f=false
plato-dialogues.org/works.htm
csun.edu/~hcfll004/platochron.html
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

i might just be an idiot, but working my way through them gives me the impression that they both hold the same view of the world but use different language to describe it.

Plato

Aristotle and Plato have completely different philosophies.

Aristotle is obsessed with our "physical reality" while Plato can't get over "Muh Forms"

they employ separate frameworks to analyze the world but it seems like they arrive at the same endpoint. like, whether we understand an objects being-ness as an expression of a form or as a primary substance, it looks and behaves just the same don't it?

Aristotle believed in nothing beyond what you could actually experience.

Plato believed everything was indicative of the perfect Forms which no one has not only never experienced, but which we physically could not ever experience.

Their philosophies were incompatible.

>Their philosophies were incompatible.
it strikes me that their reasoning is incompatible while the ultimate implications of their theories are the same. but hey there's a good chance i'm just 2dumb anyway im going to bed.

>ultimate implications

Plato, ultimately, believed every was derived from the Forms.

I don't know what you think Aristotle said that brings him in line with that.

There's a reason Aristotle wasn't picked to head the Academy after Plato.

Aristotle is still adhered to by some Neo-Aristotleans whilst Plato has been largely disregarded or usurped by better articulations of his forms philosophy. Naturalism is a dominant philosophy and Aristotle is a huge figure in that field.

Aristotle.