"As for New York - there is no question but that its overwhelming Semitism has totally removed it from the American...

Why was HP such a nativist Anglo when at least a majority of his friends were either Jews, gay or Celtic descent.

>Looking at the early 1900's man through the modern day's values and ideas.

And just admit it, you are fine with racism hinting elements in his stories

Loveman was his only close Jewish friend, and even he turned on Lovecraft later in life.

two words: he's a jew

Who do people care if a statement is racist or not when they should only be worried about if it's true or not?

What in this quotation is factually inaccurate?

Lovecraft was racist by stoneage standards

He was right.

Einstein was a fraud. People thought he was dumb until after his patent office job then suddenly became a genius zionist spokesman.

What you've been told is "racism" is actually a normal and healthy biological response that will never go away and you're retarded if you think it ever will.

>Didn't he understand basic economics?

>The unspecified "basic economics somehow refutes Marx" argument

>Hates jews
>Married a jew
What did he mean by this?

Kill yourself

idk user the socialist calculation problem dealt a pretty fatal theoretical blow to planned economies.

The Einstein quote did not contain any of the fundemental odeas of Marx, fuck off with idealist socialism=Marx shit

Not all socialists want a planned economy, and all communists want capital to be abolished. Without a planned economy or the concept of capital, Mises' criticisms of socialism as "irrational" fall pretty flat.

He tried getting revenge by filling that Jew pussy up with his Aryan semen.

>it's a 'Veeky Forums is full of freshman lefties' episode

even in mixed economies, nationalized industries face the same problem. not sure how it would be possible to 'abolish' capital either; the Soviets didn't seem interested in doing it, and Anarchists live in fantasy-land. The NAP and the abolition of private ownership both require the universal consent of all living persons to function. Good luck with that.

I liked Silver Linings Playbook and heard JLaw say that the earth is mad at Trump and manifesting hurricanes against him.

Artistic talent /= even common sense.

Yeah. Looking like that could probably influence somone becoming bitter, having low self-steem and socially inept, which could then lead him to adopt hateful ideologies based on a false sense of being superior. Just go on /int/ and see it for yourself.
Also, the term aryan i only accurate when referring to a group of people from Iran.

>the term aryan i only accurate when referring to a group of people from Iran.

They weren't from Iran, you anti-Anglo likely jew faggot, they just settled there before becoming unAryaned over the centuries for a variety of reasons.

>dunno why Howard took in that goblin
I'm pretty sure it's more like she took him in. Lovecraft wasn't much of a breadwinner.
My guess is that he'd reached a point in his life where he wanted to try something new, and he respected her intelligence to some extent, and she put the moves on him, so he went along with it.

Sonya "made a move" on Howard within a month of his mother's death. One of the reasons he gave for divorcing her is that she wasn't enough like his mother.

The term "aryan" have always been used by iranian people to identify themselves. That's where the name Iran comes from. The term was adopted by europeans trying to find this "pure race", when they saw speakers of sanskrit called themselves "aryans"; they thought these "aryans" must have been the original indo-european race (which most probably they weren't), and immediately associated them with nordics.
So using the term "aryan" as the stereotypical blue-eyed blonde race is just inaccurate and has always been tied to racism since its adoption.

A state can't abolish capital, that was a major point of contention between Marx and Bakunin. I don't know what you mean by "fantasy-land," to me statists live in a fantasy-land, since they believe in the real existence of an idea. Any real anarchist is not going to whine about the "moral duty" to abolish private property, since any kind of deontological philosophy is essentially statist: Marx was no anarchist.

I'm not a communist or a socialist, but if you think Mises firmly grasped all theoretical branches of socialism would be an overstatement.

One thing is just to prefer people who look more like you over others, and another very different is actively hate a certain group of people for looking different.
That's like saying rape is ok since wanting to have sex is a biological response.

Are you just making shit up? Almost nothing you said is true. Indo-European = PC term for Aryan. They were white European people who bred out in Iran and got further genetically mixed through arab invasions but still maintain remnants of the early Aryan culture through language and whatever is left of Zoroastrianism.

Hate is natural emotion too. You should stop letting jewish cultural high priests tell you natural emotions are immoral and start using your brain.

No they weren't, dumbass. Iranian people have referred to themselves as aryans for millenia. In fact, Iran means Land of the Aryans (and "Persia" coming from some greek word for farsi). Europeans "academics" took that term in the 19th century to justify their theory of nordic superiority (which has no scientific credibility) on the basis of germanic languages being closely related to sanskrit (because a few words sounded similar, mind you), therefore germans=original race.
thoughtco.com/what-does-aryan-mean-195465

But yeah, keep telling yourself how superior you are from being "aryan", if that makes you feel better

There's a bunch of young and cringey try-hards on Veeky Forums that think they're doing the world a favor by reinforcing what every single Forbes 500 company thinks concerning society is the way to go, i.e. multiculturalism - cool, yay!

What you say is true: always look to see if a statement is based on reality or not.

Maybe the exposure to other groups gave him the contrast to come to that conclusion? My traveling in Asia and the ME led me to similar opinions, for instance.

Pretty sure Bowden covered it in his talk on Lovecraft, but it's been a couple years since I listened to the speech. I believe he said he just needed money, and they lived apart almost immediately after the marriage began.

youtube.com/watch?v=V7qQ7A4rWM8

It originated from the Vedic period in India, which was an Aryan (white) civilization. Even Wikipedia admits as much.

Of course they call themselves that, that's the better part of them. It's the same reason there's a cast system in India to protect the Aryans who made it there from further breeding out and to separate themselves from the street shitters. Stop viewing everything from a jewish lens and you might be less retarded one day.

kek

There's healthy about hating, but the fact that you think it is says a lot about your life

Marxism was a jewish invention, not surprised here.

>this says a lot about you!

Don't make it personal. Argue against what he said instead.

Lol, you forgot the part where the Iranian plateau saw waves of mass migration from the Pahlavi tribes to the north, or further Altaic movements during their movements west.

Just give up with trying to argue, all you'll do is list a bunch of laughable reasons why you think we're all trying to be 'politically correct' or kikes or whatnot. Most people outside of your containment board are just frustrated you're a subhuman retard with more chromosomes than IQ points.

Why is it natural? how can it be natural if it doesn't serve any purpose? Maybe some types of hate, as in a response of somone hurting you, might be useful as some sort of self-defense, but racist hate has no rational ground and it probably comes from the person having some deficient personlity trait.

Resentful and inferior people with low self-esteem often confuse their rejection with a perceived supremacy on the part of the one who rejected them

This isn't to say that you aren't inferior, but only that the one who rejected you doesn't necessarily see himself as your superior in all aspects of life. He simply finds your personal qualities distasteful or poorly conducive to his preferred society.

However, your deep insecurity naturally extrapolates your rejection to mean that he considers himself smarter, more attractive, cleaner, funnier, more competent, etc than you

The jewish elite and traitor gentile class deserve hate more than anything else in this world.

It's just like you said. Hate is natural if it serves the purpose of self-defense. That's just it concerning the jews and traitors: a natural response - nothing more or less.

I personally have jewish friends who I care about, but I despise their race collectively for what they are doing to this world. This is no contradiction whatsoever if you'd bother to study more in depth the reason why antisemitism exists.

But why do you believe that absolutely all members of a certain ethnic group should deserve hate for the actions of a small part of their group? Assuming you are white, would you want to be hated for the horrors colonists did in many parts of the world, when you yourself did not partake in such acts? The fact that you say you have jewish friends puzzles me, since you admit that you could find real qualities in a person beyond their race.
If you want to hate something or someone (which i think is not healthy) hate all the elite, be they jews or whites or whatever, if they do bad to this world (some certainly do, and not only the elite jews)

HP "Pull da Trigga on a Nigger" Lovecraft

Because the source of the poisons of what's going on in the world is the jewish ruling class, not the gentile elites. The gentiles that go along with their plans are just tools, those that sell themselves for power and money - Churchill is a great example of this, so is Trump. They are, by and large, not the originators of all things modern, which is poison to all souls it comes in contact with, nor do they have deep-seated religious views to rule over this world and deem themselves better than all other peoples on it.

Yes, I've considered your point about our colonists, though I would argue Western colonialism wasn't near as bad as you are implying it to be, and the Muslim colonists and others in history (Asians, Greeks, Romans) were way, way, way worse. Actually, when I've been in India, a few of the Indians there told me they wished the British never left, as it's so corrupt on a local level, nothing gets done, and the only decent infrastructure left is what remains from the British - and the British were the nastiest of all European colonists.

But why do I think they all deserve hate even though it's the actions of a small few of them? Simply speaking, to get anything done about them, the masses will have to be incited against them en masse. It is too nuanced for most people to think deeply enough, "Oh, it's just a few." You need to whip up a fervor against the group. For instance, when Japan attacked Pearl Harbor, it was the "Japanese" that attacked - it was the "japs" that were the enemy. This isn't true. The average Japanese person had nothing to do with it; it was their elite class that did it. But you have to speak this way in a time of war, and you're in one whether you like it not. It's just a subtle, mind-fuck war, not a physical one.

If I changed "hate" to "fury against injustice," would it make it better for you? We are talking about the group that is responsible for most of the suffering in this world for the past 100 years, physical and spiritual, and they deserve nothing less if you've accumulated enough information about their doings.

Last thing, sorry.

>The fact that you say you have jewish friends puzzles me, since you admit that you could find real qualities in a person beyond their race.

I think this is a trope of what a "racist" is and also shows how individualistic Americans have become. If I'm with an individual who is black, white, jew, whatever, I will judge him or her as an individual, good, bad, or neutral. If I am speaking about macro issues, of course I will group peoples together.

The aryan thing is not incorrect. The term originated as a synonym for indo-European/proto indo European. Technically the term only refers to the Proto indo-Iranians proper, but it still theorized (albeit with some contention) that there is an underlying Proto-Indo-European root h4erios which means noble, ethnic kinsmen. We also know that the aryans were actually Europid physically and that they were a hybrid population of Mesolithic European hunter gatherers and the original proto-indo-Europeans.
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andronovo_culture