ITT: How to spot a pleb

>my epic is gonna be the most epic of all epics
>I LOVE YOU GOD WOMEN ARE SELFISH LOL (*proceeds to guzzle cum)

>He has different opinions than I do

>[
It's almost harvesting season

>He gets his book recommendations from charts posted on Veeky Forums and /pol/

>doesn't understand platos Parmenides

>is monolingual
>can't into grammar
>reads to impress others
>doesn't annotate his books ever
>doesn't regularly discuss themes and style with other readers
>likes every book he reads equally (doesn't develop taste)

>wow writing poetry with correct word order is HARD I'll just pretend that English is Latin instead

>he thinks plato was wrong about biology
>thinks christians arent pagans

KJV is quite literally one of the single greatest works of literature in the english language though

Hölderlin you anglocel cuckold normies

>He has opinions

>reads like the quran

>main protagonist is a jew

It reads left to right what are you talking about

the bible is pretty shit, but the king james version is objectively the best way to read it

>subscribes to a philosophy ("i'm a nihilist/absurdist/[whatever]")
>repeatedly namedrop/cite philosophers when asked a question, never just answering the question and presenting anything as your own opinion (note the difference between being well-read and taking what you've read into account when forming your opinions/thoughts, and just reading the works by others and repeating it)
>only read books by authors you know you'll agree with (i.e. with same political stance, etc), never challenge your opinions, never read books by authors with different perspective
>favourite book is Camus "The Stranger", often complain how other people "don't understand the book" to pretend it's deep and not just babby's first philosophical work

god I'm sick of my ex bf
where does one find a non basic bitch non plebeian fuck bf? who will also not cheat on you with an even more basic bitch BITCH who retweet harry potter memes on twitter.

L O N D O N

I would love u

LONDON

>repeatedly namedrop/cite philosophers when asked a question, never just answering the question and presenting anything as your own opinion (note the difference between being well-read and taking what you've read into account when forming your opinions/thoughts, and just reading the works by others and repeating it)

Fuck fuck fuck fuck fuck

>he thinks that Shakespeare is better than Cervantes

post feet

get the fuck out of my thread.

Only trash like you doesn't read the KJV.
Unsaved moron thinks he knows anything about the bible.

kek

Stop this meme
Gide was right: too much princesses and counts and rich people no one cares about

>hurr patriotism is stupid taking pride in other people's accomplishments is STUPID
>REEEEEEE stop quoting other authors and just assimilate their thoughts into your own arguments!
Surely you can see how after enough nagging in the first degree, that the second is merely a logical progression. What's the point in articulating an argument that takes credit in someone else's thought? Sure, I can agree with what someone else philosophized and utilize it rhetorically: but in lockstep I have been conditioned to attribute what is someone else's to their own person.

This is why you never take instruction from roasties, lads. They only think they know what they want until you appease them and they are even more unhappy than they were before you severed your testicles (for obvious reasons: no woman wants a literal cuck). Sad!

>Doesn't post the gif version of that image

>doesn't live an easy financial life of off softcore porn amazon e-books generated largy by a simple script written in nawk, a quick proofreading is needed only for grammar and situations too surreal.

>he's so juvenile and insecure that he needs to assert his delusions of superiority constantly by shitting on anyone who reads something he doesnt or has an opinion on something that he disagrees with

Is that you, Ontologicool?

>lol ranDUMB xD

This is what the letztermensch looks like

Elaborate? Genuinely curious.

>dismisses scaldic poetry because it's "too formulaic"
>prefers the second part of don quijote
>can't figure out the meaning of chinese characters just by looking at them

>he reads any form of genre fiction
>he barely knows his classics
>he tends to believe that if he likes a given work, it is justified on an artistic level
>he thinks everyone's opinion should be accepted and respected
>he speaks a single language
>he reads contemporary versions of Shakespeare or Milton
>he reads for the plot
>he reads for entertainment
>he rarely reads nonfiction
>he doesn't have a solid grounding in philosophy
>he doesn't have at least have some understanding of the Three Tragedians and Homer
>he has little to no understanding of literature outside of his cultural horizon
>he has little to no understanding of literature within his own cultural horizon
>he mostly reads contemporary literature
>he believes 'the author is dead'
>he makes his literary analysis proceed from ideology
>he thinks intricate prose is 'pretentious' and that the author 'should just get to the point'
>he rarely reads poetry
>he thinks Rhythm and Rhyme are just useless rules and laws restricting creativity
>he has a hard time explaining why he likes a given work
>he has a hard time forming structured and relevant literary criticism
>he tends to refuse to judge works for himself, rather relying on the opinions of literary authorities
>he rarely reads for more than one or two hours straight

>he likes Hemingway

>he thinks time selects for the best art

>Doesn't read Strauss cuz the Iraq war

>he's a chantard

you better have a penis i swear to god

i dont

>is an american/anglo

>He can't read fiction and flaunts it as an asset.

[/thread]

>he's too much of a brainlet to understand the most influential version of the bible

Have you ever used a wheel, or a computer, or a chair? You don't have to take pride for yourself in the creations of someone else to use their creations, though the creator himself should be praised for their creation. You've made a fatal non-sequitur tbqh

>waaaaah everyone who doesn't believe vague teachings in exactly the same way I do isn't saved waaaaaaaaah

>he reads books.

>only reads Veeky Forums memes like Ulysses and Infinite Jest
>develops his political views through memes and comedians
>think taking hallucinogens will make him more creative
>fucking loves science
>watches Rick and Morty
>Drumpf

>mispronounces Nietzsche
>didn't start with the Greeks

thats a teleological fallacy, those thigns don't necessarily presuppose each other

fucking this

>He thinks God is real

"vague"
you clearly don't know how to be saved, lmao.

How the fuck would you account for the existence of logic (objective) if God did not exist dumbass?

biology

facepalm

nature?

>he thinks logic (objective) is real

>how can ''vague archaic concept X'' be real without ''vague archaic concept Y'' being real.

I pray for your mental health

>logic (objective)
you mean like gravity and how matter forms into chemicals etc. ? are you saying there is a god because we don't completely understand how physics works right now?

What the fuck are you talking about, I wasn't framing them as if they necessarily presupposed each other

Nice shitpost

plebs read plays

>>he reads contemporary literature instead of letting time filter shit for him.
>being engaged with the culture you are living in makes you a pleb

>he compares singular works by one author to the Bible

>he can't separate his own personal taste from objective quality
>he can't sincerely say "it's poorly written but I like it"
>he believes that allusions always add quality to a work
>he hates characters for acting stupidly
>he gets bored with a story and can't explain why

>he doesn't love Papa

>I pray
Check mate Anesthetist

ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/12/king-james-bible/nicolson-text

It does if you live in a pleb culture.

>he posts on Veeky Forums

No how about YOU fuck off!

>he reads

how are you faggots not so immersed in your own affairs you're out 'spotting plebs'?

which bible translation do you consider the best?
>inb4 vulgate, I know you can't actually read latin

I can't even being to fathom how wrong this thread is.
Only plebs read, retard.

>modern """culture"""

underrated post

Literally projecting, ebin.

>He can't solve the time-depended Schrödinger equation for the eigenvalues

>"""modern""" (((culture)))

New Testament should be read in Koine Greek. Greek should be studied specifically for this reason, with an added benefit of shedding some light on the pagan Greek philosophers. Classical Hebrew (and, to a lesser extent, Aramaic) ought to be studied to some degree to expand one's understanding of the Old Testament, but the Greek Septuagint is more than sufficient for most purposes. Far superior to the latin Vulgate. English translations are not for the truly educated, but are only acceptable because they give broad access to the plebeian class. In this sense, the KJV is decent and has made a solid contribution to the world. But if your understanding comes only from the KJV you are, sadly, a pleb.

>(((modern))) "culture"
Got that one backwards senpai, modernity is the problem and the culture it spawns is nonexistent.

Law of non-contradiction is proof of that my imbecile friend.

Wtf have you been smoking? Do you even know what logic is?

>Law of non-contradiction

>>subscribes to a philosophy ("i'm a nihilist/absurdist/[whatever]")

Retarded. If more people subscribed to a set of rational principles, society would be so much better off.

You are retarded.

Have you ever thought that you might be the pleb, OP?

How do you mispronounce Nietzsche?

>The Iliad