Far rightist here. I've decided to give pic related a read. What should I expect?

Far rightist here. I've decided to give pic related a read. What should I expect?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_History_of_Sexuality
cogsci.uci.edu/~ddhoff/ConsciousRealism2.pdf
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Read the fucking book and THEN make a thread, you fucking retard.

D I S C O U R S E

Just fucking read it.

i guess this is what to expect from the Yelp generation though.

this is what I get for being open minded? Geez

muh discourse
muh history
muh neechee

>Far right
>Open minded

Where to start with AIDS nietzsche?

>"Far rightist"
>c-c-can you guys hold my hand and tell me I did good when I thought about reading a book that could possibly offend my beliefs

Did you eat your veggies too, big boy?

...

honestly I feel like most far-righters would like foucault at least a bit

definitely more than left-leaning moderates like Rawls or Popper

Begin with Rousseau and Voltaire

So here's the thing: you just don't walk into Foucault's Steam Room. You gotta rub shoulders with this following dudes (and it's always dudes LMAO): Kant, Freud, Hegel, Marx/Engels. You gotta take a ride in Nietzsche's Horsey Theme Park full of Eternal Return and >mein got. After those fuckers spin your bald head in a circle, then ya gotta pull down your pants and let Freud ram you so fucking hard with a cigar after pouring cocaine up your arse.

Got that down? Know about a priori and about the Master Slave dialectic and psychic trauma? Fuck yes you do you bottom bitch. NOW you gotta figure out what the fuck Jeremy Bentham was going about with prisons and shit.

So you got those experiences down, now you gotta think about FUCKING and what happens when we STOP FUCKING and start TALKING ABOUT FUCKING forever and ever. And then, when you're sitting in that steam bath and all that stink and sweat is clogging up yer nostrils, then you gotta think about what society is doing about its crazy people problem! Where are the crazy people? Are they locked up? Or are they roaming around, free as hell?

in case you haven't noticed, this board's changed a lot over the past year. The /pol/onization is nearly complete, and Veeky Forumserally Hitler will be ours!

I don't know. He was a sexual deviant, which is off putting

...

You'll probably enjoy him, actually. Most far left people read him, think he's right about history, and think that it's awful. You'll read him, think he's right about history, and think that it's great.

kek

history of sexuality

Man. Your post made me really depressed. People's preconceptions completely rule their perceptions of fact. How will anything ever be objective?

Foucault was a fascist LArping as a lefty so the Jews let him teach.

u do have to wonder how the fuck they let a catholic dude become a major postmodern star, just that a lone makes him interesting and worth reading, but maybe since he was a homo they didn't consider him a threat, seems like the jews always make sure their token gentiles are gay

Might like this book. Shows how many philosophers, including Foucault, had sympathies for Fascism.

intellectual romance with fascism? intellectuals fucking love totalitarian systems, probably because as tenured profs they're all masters of navigating byzantine political bureaucracies so they think they will flourish, but the intellectual class these days is mostly limited to jews so they can't really have a romance with fascism which means their only option is communism

Ha, or repressed homosexuals like the dominance and brutality of fascism along with its inherent elitism and darwinism

They didn’t, he was murdered.

no it's because letting the brainwashed, uneducated masses have their say in how things should be run is a terrible idea

I think Foucault is more useful to the right nowadays than he is to the left.

Things are different from the 60s and 70s, the time he wrote. The establishment isn't conservative anymore, but liberal-progressive, the narrative of the left is one of historical triumphalism (The Right Side of History™).

Foucault believed that his criticism of grand metanarratives and promotion of localized narratives would serve revolutionary communist interests, but there is no reason why the far-right couldn't apropriate his intellectual defense of such potential to defend their "Hyperborean Aryans from Atlantis" bullshit.

When the left uses Foucault i always feel like they're meddling with something beyond their understanding that will destroy them eventually.

especially since foucault attacks gay identity

Don't believe the people who say he is compatible with right wing thought, this is the guy who fantasized about dying in an orgy where everyone killed themselves afterward.

>if we remove transcendental values from the equation and root politics in raw power, somehow we will emancipate humanity

Who the fuck could think that was a good idea, for the interests of the left, at least?

So literally Hitler?

Discipline and Punish
Archaeology of Knowledge

>thinking the right isn't gay as fuck

dude have u checked out any of these alt-right outfits bro? straight up homoerotic

He attacks literally every identity, the key word here is "identity"

...

Foucault is the one who started the whole "gender is fluid" thing. You aren't going to like him.

Foucault was an anarchist.

in what did foucault write about gender is fluid? feminists and queers always bitch that he was too mancentric, dude didn't give a fuck about chicks

He didn't believe in gender as an identity at all. He traditional gender roles could be harmful to some.

don't conflate butler with foucault, or cite ya shit

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_History_of_Sexuality

Fuck he looks cool.

Gay sex is the epitome of fascism. Pure raw power, domination, celebrated male virility.

i've read it, it's not in there, and if you took a second to cmd+f your own fuckin link you'd see the term "gender" does not appear until the section on judith butler, this is what happens when wikipedia skimming goes wrong and u shud feel bad

gender is an issue of human sexuality.

Gender is a grammatical term.

foucault only wrote about gay problems dude, he didn't care about trannies, just read it, it's like 200 pages

Brilliant.

He wrote about the problems capitalist society has caused. including imposing the binary gender system.

If the objective exists, it is completely unknowable to us, like an eternally dangling carrot that we will always be cursed to go easy on.

Foucault was actually right wing if you read him right. He hated gay people and leftists and wanted to return to monarchism.

North African Jewish mystic Derrida confirmed.

Says who? We will grab the objective by its balls and make it our bitch.

But once you believe that nothing objective is attainable, you’re free to turn all of the humanities and social sciences into Jewish propaganda.

>Says who? We will grab the objective by its balls and make it our bitch.
And how are you going to do that?

Why do you think of it as categorical? Just because you can't reach total objectivity does not mean some thing cannot be more true than another. Stop being a black and white bitch.

There is truth, it’s obvious to anyone who seriously studies any subject. Instead of working on serious academic inquiry, however, Jews transform their innate instinctive revulsion from truth into a justification for making all humanities and social sciences into polemics based on the sheer violence of forcing a point of view. They then circlejerk and ignore any evidence that contradicts their dogma of no-truth.

he definitely has a nostalgia to him, but what do u expect he basically read every scrap of paper left over from the classical west

>There is truth
Hello, where is the demonstrations?

>simplifying potential mates
>problem

>binary gender system
>imposed by capitalism

>he hasn’t read Husserl’s Logical Investigations.

You're right I haven't now validate your claims.

Foucault didn’t talk about capitalism, its one of the reasons socialists and communists HATE him. Seriously, go read Jacobin, they talk shit on him all the time for failing to become a Marxicuck.

Honestly if you don’t understand the role of truth in phenomena, nothing I say can help you. Congrats, you’re hopeless.

the guy who claims hes a marxist tranny defender never read any foucault, foucault may have been a power bottom, but he was no sissy, look at him, do u think he gives a fuck about a tranny?

That's cool I'll just mosey on over to /leftypol/ and ask them instead.

Hurr durrr “validate your claims”, aka conform truth into my autistic propositional calculus.

>X is the state of affairs
>Why?
>How dare you ask that!
Interesting.

He translated the diary of a tranny who ended up murdering her whole family because that shit was crazy and hilarious and bourgeois libcucks couldn’t handle hearing about it.

Your position is that X is not the state of affairs, and you’ve yet to prove that, all you can do is bully autists for making mistakes or complain about much traditional hegemonic readings...

is that the book he said he doesn't consider to be part of the "author-function known as foucault" or whatever lol

Burden of proof is on the no-truth virgins. Muh traditional hegemonic readings

>Your position is that X is not the state of affairs,
Proof?

Can you blame him for trolling the academic-circlejerk-celeb culture, and it’s far fucking worse in France and Europe since they consider themselves “intellectuals”.

The burden of proof is on anyone making a claim, it's not a hot potato to be passed around. It's a responsibility that you need to be conscious of if you're going to make claims.

You claim there is no truth and no such thing as objective. Sure the last part is a lazy extrapolation of the Cartesian duality that nobody except retarded fucking Jews with no reading capability outside of muuuh Talmud ever really fell for.

This whole “no right way to look at things” is such a shameless jewy way of obfuscating your corruption and theft of society that it’s almost beautiful.

>You claim there is no truth and no such thing as objective
When?

It's another ((((((jew)))))) episode. I don't intrinsically ignore these, but bored to death with it today, m8. Get some new material.

I’m not gonna get baited into reddit-quoting you. Read your posts, i know your eyes are tired from reading the Torah this Sabbath but still give it a try.

>lazy extrapolation
Do you know fucking lazy it is to relate every single issue back to one weird anthropological assumption about one particular ethnic group?

No?

It's insanely lazy.

>Read your posts
All my posts have exclusively been about asking you do demonstrate your claims.

Here is my first post

French philosophers are massive trolls from Descartes, Voltaire to this homosexual.

Can something be created from nothing?
Evidently not.
Yet there is something?
Of course, nobody would dispute this.

To be continued...

Yes.

>Can something be created from nothing?
No?
>Yet there is something?
Are you sure about that?

>What should I expect?
postmodern shlock, a bunch of neologisms, genealogy of ideas (history), long diatribes on how insane people aren't that bad...fuck this homo

The only thing I experience as being true is the JQ.

If that is so does that not place such an absurd amount of cosmic significance on the Jews that it borders on religious veneration?

Virgin Heidegger can’t handle Chad Foucault

Yes, I love the Jews because they enable me to hate so deeply. It is too them I owe my entire vote belief system. Without them, my ego in its current form would entirely perish.

>What should I expect?
Boredom.

Faggot deconstructing social order and contracts (on the ignorant basis that due to their nature as social contract or construct they're not reeel) to justify his own faggotry.

cogsci.uci.edu/~ddhoff/ConsciousRealism2.pdf

His bf was in the French communist party and he participated in the 68 commune

>hard mode= find a frenchie above a lycee who was not a communist between 1945-1980.

>68 commune
It was above all else a good party.

Yeah, you can try to rationalise it away but ol Foucault was active in the communist intellengistia until he died. After 68 there was the his backing of deleuze against the Maoists like Bidiou which again was from his bfs communist party ties. He also later became friends with a lot of althauser's collaborators etc.

>rationalize
Triggered.

He joined the party because that’s what everyone did, it’s hard for us to understand but every single French academic was in the party, it wasn’t an indication of your ideological fervor. He later left the party. Deleuze is his friend and he’s not about to let an ideology get in the way of a friendship.

The French were so buthurt and shamed by themasterace that joining the communist party= feeling stronk since the party was the only resistance while the rest of France willing collaborated and enjoyed Aryan occupation.

They couldn’t even read Heidegger openly without feeling like traitors, and they had to meme a Heidegger clone into existence (Derrida) to catch up to 1930s philosophy.

Yes he did. When he talks about modern society he is talking about capitalism.