>Comic Book artists includes a full-page panel of a sunset with no dialogue "Beautiful artwork, wonderful set-pieces, great attention to detail in his landscape, a clear show of dedication to his craft!"
>Director includes a full minute scene of a sunset with no dialogue "Pushing the boundaries of story-telling in film, incredible sense of place and setting, can easily put the audience into the world of the film, a clear show of dedication to his craft!"
>Author includes a single line about a sunset "WHAT THE FUCK IS THIS PURPLE PROSE SHIT, FUCKING GET ON WITH IT, BORING, AMATEURISH WRITING, P U R P L E P R O S E, A CLEAR HACK"
I don't know sorry. I tried to think up possible reasons but haven't come up with any.
Easton Johnson
The medium is the massage user.
Adrian Reed
Stop trying to appeal to emotion in writing. Verily, that's what comics are for
Aiden Jackson
a picture is worth 1000 words :)
Kayden Bennett
Where is that image from?
Samuel Brown
So if I want to put a single picture in the minds of my readers, it should take at least a thousand words?
Jaxon Ward
no, you just have to picture the words
Gabriel Fisher
Where is that image from?
Wyatt Rodriguez
I thought the sunsets in White Noise were pretty good.
Christian Reyes
Different mediums have different strengths and weaknesses? HOW IS THIS EVEN POSSIBLE?
Besides, if you include the sunset intelligently into the story, no one will complain either way. If you're a good writer, you can write paragraphs about it without boring your readers.
Or you could simply attempt to CREATE another one with the words. Shitty writing is when you try to PAINT with words and describing shit in a dumb way.
Justin Bennett
Some Jap's pixiv
Christian Taylor
I've also grown weary of reading about clouds in a book. Doesn't this piss you off? You're reading a nice story, and suddenly the writer has to stop and describe the clouds. Who cares?
Hudson Flores
>le funny "I like watching people die" man
Hunter Edwards
False equivalence. When visual art describes a visual phenomenon, of course it's going to make sense and be acceptable. Why on earth would the same thing be said for a written art describing said visual phenomenon?
It'd be like complaining about the reception of internal monologues in cinema and comics: "b-b-but literature can get away with heavy narration!!!! so why can't TV/films!?!?!?!"
James Garcia
It's simple. Literature is dying, if isn't dead already. Deal with it.
Liam Flores
What book has no visual phenomenons in it?
Carson Hernandez
Rofl >ofc it would be acceptle for this form of art and not that one! >doesnt state an arguenent